-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
did armorers check head gap?
How often , if ever, did armorers check head gap on Enfields? By head gap, I mean the distance between the bolt face and the rim face when a case was seated in the chamber.
Also, how important was the shoulder seating against the shoulder in the chamber when dealing with head space? I always thought head space was measured at the rim.
Information
|
Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current. |
|
-
11-06-2011 02:56 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Legacy Member
Originally Posted by
cswaffie
Also, how important was the shoulder seating against the shoulder in the chamber when dealing with head space? I always thought head space was measured at the rim.
On a 303 Rimmed cartridge the shoulder does not seat against the chamber 'shoulder'. The cartridge rim seats in the rear of the chamber.
The headspace is measured with headspace gauges that simulate the rim of the cartridge.
The cartridge rim specification is 0.064" max and 0.054" minimum.
The headspace gauge is 0.064" minimum (the same as the max cartridge rim dimension) and 0.074" maximum (which allows for 'wear & tear')
If you have a 0.064" thick cartridge rim and a 0.074" headspace then there is an additional 0.010 (10 thou) 'sloppiness', if however you are using some of the American made brass which tends to be on the thin side you could have a rim thickness of 0.057" and with a headspace of 0.074" have an additional 'slop factor' of 0.017" (17 thou)
It is this 'slop' that we try to tighten up by using larger (longer) bolt heads and reduce the EFFECTIVE headspace - however if you adjust your headspace to minimum for Rem, Win brass etc (example 0.057" rim) and then try and use Military surplus, HXP or Prvi cases (0.060"-0.064") you will struggle to close your bolt due to the increased rim thickness.
Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...
-
-
-
Did Armourers check the headspace........? They very certainly did. On EVERY weapon in their charge at least once a year during the annual PRE inspection and at any other between time when deemed necessary.
-
-
FREE MEMBER
NO Posting or PM's Allowed
Originally Posted by
Alan de Enfield
f you have a 0.064" thick cartridge rim and a 0.074" headspace then there is an additional 0.010 (10 thou) 'sloppiness', if however you are using some of the American made brass which tends to be on the thin side you could have a rim thickness of 0.057" and with a headspace of 0.074" have an additional 'slop factor' of 0.017" (17 thou)
It is this 'slop' that we try to tighten up by using larger (longer) bolt heads and reduce the EFFECTIVE headspace - however if you adjust your headspace to minimum for Rem, Win brass etc (example 0.057" rim) and then try and use Military surplus, HXP or Prvi cases (0.060"-0.064") you will struggle to close your bolt due to the increased rim thickness.
Yes, Alan, that's it. How did they gauge that slop/space?
If you throw in a headspace gauge, it measures if the bolt will close on certain rim thickness. So, if you then put in a case with a thinner rim, is it out of spec? There's a gap there.
How'd they measure that gap - or did they at all (my original query). Or, was it just considered in spec and not bothered with?
-
Legacy Member
"They" would not be using a variety of case rim thicknesses (well they would but the Mil spec is generally thicker than the commercial ones) so it was not an isue.
If the bolt closed on a 0.064" headspace gauge and did not close on a 0.074" gauge the rifle was safe, within specification and was 'passed'
Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...
-
Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:
-
Deceased January 15th, 2016
Originally Posted by
cswaffie
Also, how important was the shoulder seating against the shoulder in the chamber when dealing with head space? I always thought head space was measured at the rim.
As has been alluded to, not with a rimmed cartridge like the .303.
-
Advisory Panel
One comment I would like to make to maybe add a little perspective ...
quite likely almost EVERY Lee Enfield Rifle (except for DP rifles) didn't have any issues with headspace until SAAMI wrote their own spec for brass and disregarded the OEM's specifications.
Use the correct gauge to check headspace .074"... if it passes the gauge and your brass is failing, then it is (almost certainly) your brass at fault. It will be thinner in the rim, lighter in the base and usually thinner in the walls too than the ammunition originally intended for use in these rifles
Last edited by Son; 11-07-2011 at 04:48 AM.
-
Thank You to Son For This Useful Post: