+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: L39A1 and Envoy Accuracy

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member NMC_EXP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-06-2021 @ 06:59 PM
    Location
    U.S.A. - Colorado
    Posts
    73
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    05:10 AM

    Question L39A1 and Envoy Accuracy

    Greetings all

    I enjoy owning and shooting old target rifles. The L39A1 and Envoy type are interesting and have some questions.

    --Accuracy wise, how would a new L39A1 or Envoy compare accuracy wise to more current .308/7.62mm target rifles?

    --From a bedding standpoint, did the L39A1 and Envoy rifles require a significant amount of work to keep them shooting?

    Thanks

    Jim
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    “...successful rifle shooting on the range is nothing more than first finding a rifle and lot of ammunition which will do precisely the same thing shot after shot, and then developing the same skill in the rifleman.” ~ E. C. Crossman

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Legacy Member newbieDAN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Last On
    10-05-2022 @ 09:00 AM
    Location
    Bunbury West Oz
    Posts
    145
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:10 PM
    I've got an excellent very lightly used L39A1. All original right down to the .303 mag used as a loading platform. Has a twin zero micrometer sight and larger matchmaker fore-site. I use later anschutz clear acrylic "slim line" sight inserts. I'll be taking it out this Sunday and shoot it at 600 with the full bore guys (as I normally shoot it in service rifle). Might swap with somebody a send a few rounds down to get a comparison.

    All the things are there for an accurate rifle....heavy long hammer forged freely floating barrel. Action hung trigger with crisp two stage, good sights. But we're talking about a 1970's target rifle based on a 1930's receiver, with 1940's sights. Not a lot has changed in the grand scheme of things technically...but you'd want to think they're making more accurate target rifles in the 40 years since.

    All I know is that in the prone position I can group it pretty well, but you'd need a rest or sled to compare apples for 7.62 apples. But it's not going to win a Queens Prize.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Advisory Panel Thunderbox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    01-10-2022 @ 02:07 PM
    Posts
    1,150
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:10 AM
    It is of course down to the shooter: I'd guess that for at least 90% of shooters, an Enfield-based target rifle will produce the same result as a modern target rifle.

    I'm not a fanatical target shooter (as a military shooter I find it incredibly tedious that a target shooter can take 40 minutes to set up, adjust and fire just 12 shots....), but if I focus hard enough, I can usually place third or fourth, using an L39 or Envoy amongst twenty or so modern rifle users.

    At short to medium ranges (up to 600 yards) I'd say an Enfield can still be competitive. For medium to long ranges (up to 1200 yards), you're starting to feel the disadvantage of a relatively short barrel designed for a slower round (the 144 gn NATO ball). When rebarrelled, Enfields do keep on going: One of the Envoys in my stock was the top-scoring rifle at 900x and 1000x during the 1994 Commonwealth Games. Its an Envoy fitted with a Madco stainless barrel and a target butt, but otherwise standard (top rifle in photo).


  6. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Thunderbox For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    Legacy Member NMC_EXP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-06-2021 @ 06:59 PM
    Location
    U.S.A. - Colorado
    Posts
    73
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    05:10 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by newbieDAN View Post
    All the things are there for an accurate rifle....heavy long hammer forged freely floating barrel. Action hung trigger with crisp two stage, good sights. But we're talking about a 1970's target rifle based on a 1930's receiver, with 1940's sights. Not a lot has changed in the grand scheme of things technically...but you'd want to think they're making more accurate target rifles in the 40 years since.
    Thank you sir. All other things remaining equal, I have heard rear locking lugs on the bolt is a disadvantage.

    Regards

    Jim
    “...successful rifle shooting on the range is nothing more than first finding a rifle and lot of ammunition which will do precisely the same thing shot after shot, and then developing the same skill in the rifleman.” ~ E. C. Crossman

  8. #5
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    enscien's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Last On
    12-01-2019 @ 01:03 PM
    Posts
    44
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:10 AM
    Back in the 1970s the fashion at Bisley was to shoot the No.4 Rifle conversions at long range (900 and 1,000 yards) because its positive compensation was reckoned to be useful in coping with variations in performance of the military ammunition used, giving an advantage over stiffer actions. By the 1980s the very stiff front locking single shot actions such as the 'Swing' and 'Paramount' gained the edge, with the additional advantage of faster lock times and match triggers. Ammunition consistency was also improved.
    The bedding on these rifles is critical. If you look at most No.4 Rifle conversions that have been used for serious target shooting you will often notice pegged holes at the back of the forend, in front of the transverse screw or bar. This is where gunsmiths have inserted special internal hardwood inserts (preferably hornbeam) at the 'draws' securing them by screws from the outside. A tight bearing at this point is considered essential, also at the reinforce and other specified points on the underside of the receiver.
    Envoy rifles used coverted No.8 rifle forends (a batch of completely new forends was started, but never completed and eventually destroyed!) with glued-in inserts at the draws which have usually been replaced later on. L39s used converted No.4 rifle forends and would not have had the pegged draws installed in military service.
    To relieve pressure on the bearings it was considered good practice to slacken the front trigger guard screw by a few turns at the end of the shooting season so that the wood could recover, retightening when the rifle was brought back into use a few months later.
    There is useful contemporary information on bedding No.4 rifle conversions in 'Target Rifle Shooting' by E.G.B.Reynolds and R.A.Fulton (Barrie & Jenkins 1972 ISBN 0.214.65353.6)

  9. #6
    Legacy Member NMC_EXP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-06-2021 @ 06:59 PM
    Location
    U.S.A. - Colorado
    Posts
    73
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    05:10 AM
    Thread Starter
    ---------- Post added at 03:44 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:39 PM ----------

    [/COLOR]
    Quote Originally Posted by enscien View Post
    Back in the 1970s the fashion at Bisley was to shoot the No.4 Rifle conversions at long range (900 and 1,000 yards) because its positive compensation was reckoned to be useful in coping with variations in performance of the military ammunition used, giving an advantage over stiffer actions. By the 1980s the very stiff front locking single shot actions such as the 'Swing' and 'Paramount' gained the edge, with the additional advantage of faster lock times and match triggers. Ammunition consistency was also improved.
    The bedding on these rifles is critical. If you look at most No.4 Rifle conversions that have been used for serious target shooting you will often notice pegged holes at the back of the forend, in front of the transverse screw or bar. This is where gunsmiths have inserted special internal hardwood inserts (preferably hornbeam) at the 'draws' securing them by screws from the outside. A tight bearing at this point is considered essential, also at the reinforce and other specified points on the underside of the receiver.
    Envoy rifles used coverted No.8 rifle forends (a batch of completely new forends was started, but never completed and eventually destroyed!) with glued-in inserts at the draws which have usually been replaced later on. L39s used converted No.4 rifle forends and would not have had the pegged draws installed in military service.
    To relieve pressure on the bearings it was considered good practice to slacken the front trigger guard screw by a few turns at the end of the shooting season so that the wood could recover, retightening when the rifle was brought back into use a few months later.
    There is useful contemporary information on bedding No.4 rifle conversions in 'Target Rifle Shooting' by E.G.B.Reynolds and R.A.Fulton (Barrie & Jenkins 1972 ISBN 0.214.65353.6)
    Excellent information. Thank you kindly.

    Regards

    Jim
    Last edited by NMC_EXP; 11-18-2011 at 04:46 PM. Reason: software is doing strange things....
    “...successful rifle shooting on the range is nothing more than first finding a rifle and lot of ammunition which will do precisely the same thing shot after shot, and then developing the same skill in the rifleman.” ~ E. C. Crossman

  10. Thank You to NMC_EXP For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Service for L42A1, Enforcer, Envoy and L39A1 Owners.
    By Simon in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 863
    Last Post: 03-05-2024, 07:22 PM
  2. No.8 and Envoy handguards - are they the same?
    By Nigel in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-12-2020, 05:17 AM
  3. Envoy Price
    By enfield303t in forum Appraisals, Fakery, Dispute Resolution & Mediation Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-25-2010, 01:02 AM
  4. L39a1
    By Mike N in forum Ammunition and Reloading for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-24-2009, 09:45 AM
  5. lee enfield Envoy
    By Alligator427 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-19-2009, 07:41 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks