+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: 1943 BSA No4 MK1 T scope, tin and transit chest, any good ?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member lugerfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Last On
    @
    Location
    England
    Posts
    68
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    08:14 PM

    1943 BSA No4 MK1 T scope, tin and transit chest, any good ?

    Good Evening every one. This is my first post so please be kind …..

    First of all I’d like to give my thanks for all the hard work that's obviously gone on building up the knowledge base here. I have joined up mostly to research the Number 4 MK1 T as it has been a long term goal of mine to buy a good honest one. I have spent quite a few hours working my way through the web site, the fantastic virtual tours and also the Armourer’s perspective book by Mr Laidlericon & Skennertonicon (excellent book– totally invaluable)

    I’ve recently found one for sale with a chest and tin, which I should be able to get a good look over this weekend, but in the meantime the seller has sent me some very blurry photos (with his apologies as to the ability of the camera) to get an idea of what to look for when I see it in the metal as it were. It’s with a scope tin & chest, all seeming to be matching.

    Hope it’s OK if I post the pictures here and my thoughts, it would a great help if people could chime in with their observations and help me learn what to look for.

    Rifle:
    Basically it’s a BSA 1943, serial number B30XXX - so it’s close to some that are mentioned on here, but I’m not sure if the early date means that some of the standards may not have been too rigidly applied at this point in time.

    I think the “T” stamp on the left hand side is in the correct font (hard to see on the pic) it supposedly has the “S” sighting stamp and what looks to be the crown over “E” Enfield examiners mark, though this is again hard to see on the photo.

    The scope pads look to have been off quite a few times on the front & a couple on the back (not unusual?)

    The Holland and Holland S51 looks to be in an unusual font from all the others I have seen, I presume this may not be original ???

    A scope serial number 6804 is stamped on the wrist.

    Attachment 28532Attachment 28533Attachment 28534Attachment 28535Attachment 28536Attachment 28537Attachment 28538


    Scope:

    In the photo it reads
    TEL. SIGHTING
    No 32. MK.1.
    OS. 466A KL
    1942 REG. No 6804
    /¦\
    Can’t see if there is an extra line after this, but don’t think so.


    The markings on the rings are not marked in white paint.
    The scope mount has the rifles number on it. Not sure if the profile of the rear leg looks a little strange to me.
    Attachment 28545Attachment 28544Attachment 28543Attachment 28542Attachment 28541Attachment 28540Attachment 28539Attachment 28546

    Scope Tin:
    Stamped:
    CASE, STG.TEL.
    No8 MARK1
    B.E. Ltd 1941 OS906A

    Stampings look a little erratic, not sure if these were hand done ?.

    Attachment 28547Attachment 28548

    Chest,
    I don’t know much about these, but is marked
    RIFLE NO.4 MK1 T
    839482
    SIGHT TELE NO.32 MK1
    6804

    Attachment 28549Attachment 28550Attachment 28551Attachment 28552



    So, allowing for the fact that I haven’t checked the battle sights, front woodwork and a few other areas, I guess my biggest concerns are

    The unusual S51 stamp on the butt and the scope

    No white markings on the scope drums

    General finish of the scope (allowing for the low res picture)

    “Scope Serial number” 6804 that is marked on the rifle, scope case and chest, but on the scope the number 6804 seems to be a reference number and not a serial number. (If it is the serial number then it should be a Kershaw MK1 – I cant find any reference pics of one of them to compare)


    Any thoughts on the above and what else I’ve missed? It would be good to go armed with more knowledge than i currently have, or at least know its it likely to be a waste of time before I start.

    Thanks all, a No4 MK1 T would be the biggest purchase I’ve made in collecting deacts, so I really want to get it right first time.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    03-20-2024 @ 06:05 AM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,429
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    08:14 PM
    It's only my humble opinion but:

    S51 does indeed look suspect
    Difficult to say much about front pad due to limited photo views & blurriness.
    Rear pad does not look to be genuinely from that rifle
    Butt wrist (where scope number is situated) has been heavily sanded down. Note it is below the level of the butt socket.
    Rifle itself COULD be a real 4T but would have had to be stripped of pads & , with later pads subsequently refitted
    Rifle has definietly been renumbered. B prefix 5 digit number dates from early 1944, not 1943.
    Scope is correct, but you do NOT find 1941 dated scopes on matching 1943/44 era rifles.
    Scope tin bears hand stamped markings - originals were generally rolled on.
    Bracket does look like it may be a real Rose Brothers product, but looks to have been 'cleaned up'.
    There are people on this forum who know far more about transit chests than I but it looks too pretty to me...

    Hope this helps, & remember, it's only my opinion. No doubt the seller has given his too!!

    ATB

  4. Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:


  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #3
    Moderator
    (Milsurp Forums)


    Amatikulu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    12-30-2023 @ 05:23 PM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,282
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    03:14 PM
    I would be very skeptical of this rifle based on my limited collection of genuine "T's"
    1. Agree with you all on the "S51" stamp
    2. Agree rifle serial number is not consistent with a 1943 BSA - and has been re stamped
    3, Label inside chest is dated 6/45 unless my eyes deceive me
    oh heck, I agree with everything else Roger has said

  7. Thank You to Amatikulu For This Useful Post:


  8. #4
    Advisory Panel

    jmoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-09-2023 @ 04:20 AM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    7,066
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:14 PM
    No disagreement with any of the above.

  9. #5
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    03-24-2024 @ 09:52 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,507
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:14 PM
    I would say that the telescope is genuine as is the chest. But the rest looks to me like it's a what used to be called '....a bitza'

    Further to the other comments. The butt is definately not the original for a reason that I won't go into

    This is only my opinion as an enthusiastic amateur.......... like the enthusiastic amateur who put the rifle together

  10. #6
    Administrator

    Site Owner
    Badger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Age
    75
    Posts
    12,941
    Real Name
    Doug
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:14 PM
    My Videos in Video Club
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Laidlericon View Post
    This is only my opinion as an enthusiastic amateur.......... like the enthusiastic amateur who put the rifle together
    Peter ...

    There's a "Shakespearean" side to you ...

    Regards,
    Doug

  11. #7
    Administrator

    Site Owner
    Badger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Age
    75
    Posts
    12,941
    Real Name
    Doug
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:14 PM
    My Videos in Video Club
    12
    A question I have to ask....

    Why are there so many punch marks (dimples?) around the scope mounting bracket screws on the lugerfan's No.4Mk1(T) example he's looking at buying?

    Attachment 28565
    Click PIC to Enlarge

    As compared to known "all correct" No.4Mk1(T) examples, such as the one in the MKLicon?

    1944 Enfield No.4 Mk1(T) Sniper Rifle


    Click PIC to Enlarge

    Does that just mean that this particular scope bracket has been un-mounted and re-mounted several times on a receiver?

    Regards,
    Doug

  12. #8
    Legacy Member lugerfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Last On
    @
    Location
    England
    Posts
    68
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    08:14 PM
    Thread Starter

    Smile

    Hi all,

    Many thanks to everyone who replied. Glad to know I wasn’t too far out with my judgement. It’s not the type I’m really looking for. If anyone knows of an honest unmolested example around for sale, please let me know via pm. As yet I’ve not see too many dealers that have them for sale & it seems way to easy to buy one that been put together. Looks like sticking with the recognised H&H conversion may be the best way to minimise my risks.

    Have to say the dealer was very helpful and didn’t push this as a fully matching all correct example, but one that required some research.

    Couple of questions to follow up:

    • Re the incorrect BSA serial number, is there an online reference matching numbers to production years somewhere. Seems it would be a good thing to have to hand for the future.

    • Does the scope look re worked? I thought the finish would have been blued and had a serial number visible somewhere.

    • Would all H&H conversions had the crown over E examiners mark forward of the stock on the metal by the bolt, or is this mark likely to missing on some of the early conversions?

    Thanks again for all your help really very much appreciated.

  13. #9
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    03-24-2024 @ 09:52 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,507
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:14 PM
    In answer to Badgers question. On well used No4T's and L42's, such as those used on the courses here at Warminster (and Brecon) by the Sniper Division, they really got a pasting. As a result of continual shooting and recoil moments about an axis, the soldered front pad would shear and make the screws loose by literally stretching them. It was a never ending battle and every time you put new screws in, you re-staked the pad into the screw.

    So you can see the evidence before you of a WELL used and abused rifle. There was much discussion about an answer but generally speaking, if you tinned the surfaces correctly (no gorilla glue or thread-lock or loktite here I hasten to add.........) and sweated it back together and at the same time ran the solder down the screw shanks/threads AND screwed them up xxxxing tight so that they cooled down and contracted into place they were as good as gold.

    But I always told the Armourers under my wing, especially those on the sniper div, where I learned my stuff about them, to stake the metal from the expendable screw into a suitable stake mark in the pad. If you don't screw the front pads down properly, you just end up chasing them around and around. But to be honest, you'd never get one staked to this extent, even on the old thrashed to death No4's and L42's used in the training wing because by that time, the barrels and bodies will have been worn out. The rear pad was usually trouble free because the 1/4" rear thumbscrew was sufficient to prevent any torque load. And we didn't EVER use the same screw again opr butcher the heads either. Or if you did, you used a scraper to remove the swarfed screwdriver edge

    Has that answered the Q Badger and everyone?

    Can we all agree that it's very probably a 'mid Asian' heap of tat, tarted up to make a quick buck? I'd like to give it a quick mechanical 'in-inspection' Eh...... Son, Tankie and Skippy!

  14. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  15. #10
    Legacy Member skiprat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Last On
    Today @ 06:37 AM
    Location
    North Yorkshire
    Posts
    294
    Real Name
    andrew sharp
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    08:14 PM
    I think I saw this at Beltring this year .... (well the box at least) the main bits look original.... but..... the fittings are a poor replacement in course grain pine!
    I dont know about the rifle, I work on 5.56mm coke cans... (other soft drink cans are available)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. no.7 transit chest
    By read6737 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-15-2020, 09:04 PM
  2. EBAY kicked my scope and transit chest auctions off, please read!
    By SKYHOOKDUTCH in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 08-03-2011, 01:10 AM
  3. Mk1 Transit Chest
    By 8udr in forum The Bren LMG (Light Machine Gun)
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 12-30-2010, 07:47 AM
  4. Transit Chest
    By peregrinvs in forum The Bren LMG (Light Machine Gun)
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 10-22-2010, 03:57 PM
  5. Modifying a Cno7 transit chest into a faux No 15 sniper chest
    By Cantom in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-30-2007, 08:44 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks