+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Building a Win 5.78m receiver. Correct rear sight?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member tenOC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Last On
    10-27-2021 @ 05:38 PM
    Location
    Earth, Milky Way. And as seen in another dimension.
    Posts
    638
    Local Date
    04-18-2024
    Local Time
    11:54 AM

    Building a Win 5.78m receiver. Correct rear sight?

    I have a 5.78 Win receiver with a stamped rear sight marked IRCO 7160060. Is this incorrect for the receiver? I have spare sights: stamped IRCO with no number and milled with H in shield.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Legacy Member tenOC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Last On
    10-27-2021 @ 05:38 PM
    Location
    Earth, Milky Way. And as seen in another dimension.
    Posts
    638
    Local Date
    04-18-2024
    Local Time
    11:54 AM
    Thread Starter
    Anybody? Here's a pic of the staking. I'm not sure this was the original sight on this receiver by looking at the staking. I'd also like to know which barrel would be correct. I'm not sure if the intermediate or the later proofing location is proper. If I was to guess, I'd go with intermediate. Opinions?

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Senior Moderator
    (Milsurp Forums)
    Bill Hollinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 12:22 PM
    Location
    Pacific Northwest, Oregon
    Posts
    6,021
    Real Name
    Bill Hollinger
    Local Date
    04-18-2024
    Local Time
    08:54 AM
    Mine has a type II Hemphill ("H" in a shield).
    Bill Hollinger

    "We're surrounded, that simplifies our problem!"

  6. #4
    Legacy Member JOHN42768's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    09-05-2021 @ 11:13 AM
    Location
    Upstate N.Y.
    Posts
    191
    Local Date
    04-18-2024
    Local Time
    11:54 AM
    Tenoc, Take a look at NL# 237 p.8. There appears to have been a all style mixed usage from 5.689 to the end. John

  7. #5
    Legacy Member tenOC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Last On
    10-27-2021 @ 05:38 PM
    Location
    Earth, Milky Way. And as seen in another dimension.
    Posts
    638
    Local Date
    04-18-2024
    Local Time
    11:54 AM
    Thread Starter
    Thanks. I still have to order those back issues.
    I was wondering of the 716xxxx numbering indicated it was a replacement during an armory rebuild. Being a buildup project, I think I'll change it to something with the H in shield.
    I have 3 barrels to choose from in proof stamping. One doesn't match in color atall.

  8. #6
    Senior Moderator
    (Milsurp Forums)
    Bill Hollinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 12:22 PM
    Location
    Pacific Northwest, Oregon
    Posts
    6,021
    Real Name
    Bill Hollinger
    Local Date
    04-18-2024
    Local Time
    08:54 AM
    I used to think the numbered type III was a replacement but Brian Quick pointed out that they were actually original to WWII carbines. You may want to rethink replacing it until you have researched it with the CNLs as John42768 suggested and even then you may choose to leave it as is.
    Bill Hollinger

    "We're surrounded, that simplifies our problem!"

  9. #7
    Legacy Member tenOC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Last On
    10-27-2021 @ 05:38 PM
    Location
    Earth, Milky Way. And as seen in another dimension.
    Posts
    638
    Local Date
    04-18-2024
    Local Time
    11:54 AM
    Thread Starter
    You're right. I'll leave it as is and look to the new letters as previously suggested.

  10. #8
    Legacy Member deldriver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Last On
    05-12-2023 @ 01:27 PM
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    444
    Real Name
    John
    Local Date
    04-18-2024
    Local Time
    11:54 AM
    I do hope that particular sight is correct for that serial number Winchester. My 5.76 rifle has the same exact sight on it and the staking looks good in my humble opinion. I do hope so more info comes to light in this thread. Also, someone else asking this question stops me from doing another thread...Thanks 10!

  11. #9
    Legacy Member DaveHH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-18-2024 @ 01:37 PM
    Location
    Northern Calif
    Posts
    1,348
    Real Name
    David Haynes
    Local Date
    04-18-2024
    Local Time
    10:54 AM

    Here is a photo of original factory staking

    it is also staked in the back of the sight. This on a 5.6

  12. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to DaveHH For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Correct rear sight and barrel band for IBM carbine?
    By LeagleEagle in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-08-2011, 10:23 PM
  2. Is my NM Garand Receiver correct?
    By cooterboro in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-11-2011, 10:52 PM
  3. Building a better mousetrap: The red rifle front sight tool.
    By Claven2 in forum Gunsmithing for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-21-2010, 06:56 AM
  4. Barrel correct for receiver?
    By vette in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-15-2009, 11:48 AM
  5. Correct Inland receiver and barrel dates
    By shamrocks in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-11-2009, 09:12 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts