+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: Does someone have a list of .22 weapons used by the US Military for training in WWII?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #11
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    ABPOS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last On
    01-09-2014 @ 01:35 PM
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Age
    52
    Posts
    617
    Local Date
    04-23-2024
    Local Time
    11:37 AM
    Thread Starter
    Does it charge the action in that cutout on the bottom? Because I see no other way of cycling the action. They are pretty sweet though. I've always liked the reising 50. I never understood why they didn't make a carbine in .45 instead of .30 carbine. Like the resing, even if it would've been in semi. It would have made one less caliber to carry. Although I would imagine the .30 carbine has a little flatter trajectory and may be more affective at 200 meters or so. IDK. I've shot my M1icon Carbine at 300 before and kind of stayed on a silhouette. But it wasn't the most accurate thing out at that distance. Of course, it is very old and it probably shot much better with a better muzzle crown and no TE.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #12
    Legacy Member emmagee1917's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last On
    11-27-2022 @ 11:10 AM
    Location
    Yuma , Arizona
    Posts
    1,402
    Local Date
    04-23-2024
    Local Time
    10:37 AM
    Yep , the action bar sticks out from the reciever , under the barrel. End of it has a 90* turndown for your index finger to snag and pull back.
    Chris

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #13
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    ABPOS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last On
    01-09-2014 @ 01:35 PM
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Age
    52
    Posts
    617
    Local Date
    04-23-2024
    Local Time
    11:37 AM
    Thread Starter
    Interesting way to do it. I think that's how it is on the sub gun too. But it's been a while since I've studied them. I've never seen one in person either.

  6. #14
    Legacy Member emmagee1917's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last On
    11-27-2022 @ 11:10 AM
    Location
    Yuma , Arizona
    Posts
    1,402
    Local Date
    04-23-2024
    Local Time
    10:37 AM
    Also yep , pretty much the same design . The .22 is cheeper made and is not a tilt-lock bolt design . Also lacks the stud and FA parts , so very much like a M60 than a M50 or M55 . Much nicer rear sight , though .
    Chris

  7. #15
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    ABPOS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last On
    01-09-2014 @ 01:35 PM
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Age
    52
    Posts
    617
    Local Date
    04-23-2024
    Local Time
    11:37 AM
    Thread Starter
    IMHO, if the reising was more reliable, I would've thought it to be a handier weapon than the Thompson. Lighter and all that. Plus you could get them with the folding stock which would make them really handy for certain people. But I like the normal ole version. Just seems like it would've been a good weapon, as long as it would go boom.

  8. #16
    Legacy Member emmagee1917's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last On
    11-27-2022 @ 11:10 AM
    Location
    Yuma , Arizona
    Posts
    1,402
    Local Date
    04-23-2024
    Local Time
    10:37 AM
    They were and are good weapons . They were commercial , not military weapons when first made. They were hand fitted and the bolt lockup is sensitive to mud/sand/dirt . When the Marines first recieved them , not knowing about the hand fitting , they striped them and cleaned them and got the parts all mixed up. The ones that everyone talks about being thrown in the river were these mixed up ones that were hopelessly mismatched and it was done after the new batch of them had arrived .
    Chris

  9. #17
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    ABPOS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last On
    01-09-2014 @ 01:35 PM
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Age
    52
    Posts
    617
    Local Date
    04-23-2024
    Local Time
    11:37 AM
    Thread Starter
    Well what's interesting is any action is susceptible to dirt/sand/grime and even blood. I remember reading one book that specifically recalled an incident that a 1911 didn't go boom because there was so much caked on blood on it. Or something to that degree. I believe it was in the book, "Flags of our Fathers" and it was talking about when they were on Iwo. And I'm pretty sure Garands too. I mean, you put enough gunk into any action, and it might stop it moving. I suppose some actions might be better than others. I don't even want to speculate as to what is the best. I've owned many different weapons systems and there are very few that I have NEVER had a jam with. And that's just on a range. I do have to say though, out of all the weapons I've owned, my Beretta M9 has been the most reliable thus far. It also has the highest round count for me.

    Anyways.... I like the reising. I wish I had one. Even if they made a semi version, I'd love one.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. Infantry Weapons and their Effects (WWII and Korean era U.S. Training Films)
    By Badger in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-20-2010, 06:02 PM
  2. Fundamentals of Small Arms Weapons (WWII U.S. Training Films)
    By Badger in forum Other U.S. Service Rifles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-04-2009, 03:00 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-04-2009, 03:00 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-04-2009, 02:59 PM
  5. Fundamentals of Small Arms Weapons (WWII U.S. Training Films)
    By Badger in forum Martini Henry Rifles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-04-2009, 02:59 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts