+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 47

Thread: Late Nagoya Type 99

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #11
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Midmichigun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Last On
    01-10-2017 @ 10:06 PM
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    459
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    11:01 AM
    Thread Starter
    Gents,
    I too agree on the changes in the market place. Before, I was laughed at for picking up Nippon junk. Now prices and availability have gone up. I have seen stripped receivers (late war) go for as much as I paid for this one... it was a tossup on to buy and save or pass. Generally I view this hobby as not a money making one... more like a saving history... and learning a great deal.

    If the receiver was drilled and tapped for a scope, I would generally be learning towards finishing as a sporter.

    If you look at my original post, and rifle comparison to the new purchased item, the rifle on the bottom was missing a great deal of wood! So I am not afraid of tackling projects.

    My only concern going forward is trying to repair the Bubba'd stock (and admittedly he did a fair job considering what he had to work with) to the proper finish. If you look at the area of the crossbolt, the metal is proud to the wood.


    A lil bit of "pimp my shine" going on there too! Not exactly Urushi! The concern about the cross bolt, is that he didn't leave me much material to try and restore the military finish with.

    I have seen "reproduction" buttplates, but don't think I will need one. As mine seems fine.


    I do have options on the stock itself. I have some nice hard/ sugar maple and also American Walnut that I could use to machine out a new stock.



    I also have some padauk laying around to fashion a new fore arm. I am vexed by the upper handguard, and may have to make a new one also.

    I will be on the hunt for a late war nose cap, as this is a bit harder to make out of metal!

    Thanks for your input folks!!
    Last edited by Midmichigun; 11-17-2013 at 10:39 AM.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #12
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    mil-surp60's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Last On
    01-25-2015 @ 10:32 AM
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    115
    Real Name
    David Phillips
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    11:01 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Aragorn243 View Post
    No such thing as a "last ditch" Japanese rifle. There are substitute standard rifles which do not have all the bells and whistles that the earlier rifles have and as the war progresses, the bells got smaller and the whistles quieter but one thing that did not happen is a dangerous rifle. If it has the mum, it's as safe as any early rifle. Think you may want to reaserch that dude , seen a few LAST DITCH EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE blow up from lack of good steel and quality.

    The confusion occurred most likely because Japan unlike most other nations, used training rifles which weren't real rifles. Well, a few of them were, old, worn out, etc but a lot of them were just put together out of whatever materials they could find and they looked like rifles. A GI not knowing that would take the training rifle home as a prize and attempt to shoot it which very probably would result in disaster.

    The Arisakaicon action is one of the strongest ever made and that mum on the receiver means it was accepted into the military as a fully functional and safe rifle.
    think you may want to reasearch that dude , i have seen quite a few LAST DITCH RIFLES AS EXACTLY AS THEY ARE CALLED,blow up for lack of good steel and quality near end of war ,they are exactly that , dangerous to fire at times have at it its your life man. I will stick to the real collectors that are safe to shoot made before 44, not one im afraid may blow my head off from the bolt coming off sheared off the cheap lousy quality steel receiver they were built on, your head man , however long you may not have it feeding a steady diet of full power loads in last ditchers.GOOD luck with that i wish you well.

    ---------- Post added at 03:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:57 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Midmichigun View Post
    Gents,
    I too agree on the changes in the market place. Before, I was laughed at for picking up Nippon junk. Now prices and availability have gone up. I have seen stripped receivers (late war) go for as much as I paid for this one... it was a tossup on to buy and save or pass. Generally I view this hobby as not a money making one... more like a saving history... and learning a great deal.

    If the receiver was drilled and tapped for a scope, I would generally be learning towards finishing as a sporter.

    If you look at my original post, and rifle comparison to the new purchased item, the rifle on the bottom was missing a great deal of wood! So I am not afraid of tackling projects.

    My only concern going forward is trying to repair the Bubba'd stock (and admittedly he did a fair job considering what he had to work with) to the proper finish. If you look at the area of the crossbolt, the metal is proud to the wood.
    https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...64c2dd50-1.jpg

    A lil bit of "pimp my shine" going on there too! Not exactly Urushi! The concern about the cross bolt, is that he didn't leave me much material to try and restore the military finish with.

    I have seen "reproduction" buttplates, but don't think I will need one. As mine seems fine.
    https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...66e60324-1.jpg

    I do have options on the stock itself. I have some nice hard/ sugar maple and also American Walnut that I could use to machine out a new stock.

    https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...4f779253-1.jpg

    I also have some padauk laying around to fashion a new fore arm. I am vexed by the upper handguard, and may have to make a new one also.

    I will be on the hunt for a late war nose cap, as this is a bit harder to make out of metal!

    Thanks for your input folks!!
    I have a 3 screw bayo lug ill sell ya for the type 99 you want it. with the nose cap. Also have a few steel buttplates.
    Last edited by mil-surp60; 11-18-2013 at 04:03 PM.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #13
    Contributing Member Aragorn243's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 07:21 AM
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    7,006
    Real Name
    Steve
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    12:01 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by mil-surp60 View Post
    think you may want to reasearch that dude , i have seen quite a few LAST DITCH RIFLES AS EXACTLY AS THEY ARE CALLED,blow up for lack of good steel and quality near end of war ,they are exactly that , dangerous to fire at times have at it its your life man. I will stick to the real collectors that are safe to shoot made before 44, not one im afraid may blow my head off from the bolt coming off sheared off the cheap lousy quality steel receiver they were built on, your head man , however long you may not have it feeding a steady diet of full power loads in last ditchers.GOOD luck with that i wish you well.

    ---------- Post added at 03:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:57 PM ----------

    I have a 3 screw bayo lug ill sell ya for the type 99 you want it. with the nose cap. Also have a few steel buttplates.
    I've done the research but I would LOVE to see some evidence of your personal experiences. Especially since they go against all other extensive research on these rifles. These have been extensively tested and found nearly impossible to blow up. That is ANY rifle upon which the mum was applied. These are actual SERVICE rifles.

    I think you confuse training rifles with actual service rifles. They are not the same thing. If you don't want the rifles, leaves more for thsoe of us that do.

    "Last Ditch" is a term invented by people here in the civilian world. Doesn't exist as an actual term.

    I suggest YOU do some research on the subject. Training rifles were never intended to be fired with live ammunition, a rifle with a mum on it was.
    Last edited by Aragorn243; 11-18-2013 at 09:25 PM.

  6. The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to Aragorn243 For This Useful Post:


  7. #14
    Legacy Member Salt Flat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Last On
    Today @ 01:33 AM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    760
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    09:01 AM
    Midmich, What series is this? I can't really see the mark. Salt Flat

  8. #15
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Midmichigun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Last On
    01-10-2017 @ 10:06 PM
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    459
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    11:01 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Salt Flat View Post
    Midmich, What series is this? I can't really see the mark. Salt Flat
    Salt,
    I am terrible on figuring out what series ANY of my rifles are marked as. Guess I am blind in one eye.. Can't see out of the other... I will update with a photo when I get home!

  9. #16
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Midmichigun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Last On
    01-10-2017 @ 10:06 PM
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    459
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    11:01 AM
    Thread Starter
    Salt,
    Is this a Series 40?

  10. #17
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    mil-surp60's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Last On
    01-25-2015 @ 10:32 AM
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    115
    Real Name
    David Phillips
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    11:01 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Midmichigun View Post
    How long you been collecting arisakas there dude to say you never saw a three screw early model bayo lug ,well here is one i have for sale, 1 long screw in front two small screws in back ,3 screw early model bayo lug for the type 99 well ya seen one now.

  11. #18
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    mil-surp60's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Last On
    01-25-2015 @ 10:32 AM
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    115
    Real Name
    David Phillips
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    11:01 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Aragorn243 View Post
    I've done the research but I would LOVE to see some evidence of your personal experiences. Especially since they go against all other extensive research on these rifles. These have been extensively tested and found nearly impossible to blow up. That is ANY rifle upon which the mum was applied. These are actual SERVICE rifles.

    I think you confuse training rifles with actual service rifles. They are not the same thing. If you don't want the rifles, leaves more for thsoe of us that do.

    "Last Ditch" is a term invented by people here in the civilian world. Doesn't exist as an actual term.

    I suggest YOU do some research on the subject. Training rifles were never intended to be fired with live ammunition, a rifle with a mum on it was.
    Again your ignorance of the arisakas is evident, the last ditchers had weak steel ,weak welds, and are junk, i would not pay 50 bucks for 1 , i have had several in my hands and laughed at the junk quality and how dangerous they look ,keep shooting em man you may get hit in head with the bolt and if you survive comeback to reality , i would not fire one if you piad me too JMO now i asked to just agree to disagree but you want to keep showing you sure do not know much about those last ditch junkers , not trainng rifles they threw everything they had in last yr of war in feild, quality was drastically reduced as was the quality and strength of the steel.,i have seen them straight out of ww2 pacific theatre blown up and dangerous to even fire, even better my uncle fought against them, and brought two early kokuras home, which i now own, and saw many blown up last ditch rifles on iwo jima and okinawa,so again you are crazy to even fire one read up dude , but hey your life have at it, ill stick with the early models i know wont kill me or someone next to me ,my opinion and nothing you can say will change it they are junk. Known fact, amd you are either very brave or very stupid to fire one ever. most all are dangerous to fire, the steel was not near as strong on those last ditch clunkers, i know what a training rifle is, do you?this discussion is over you shoot em ill never.Just agree to disagree and fire all those last ditchers you want man ill never do it.
    Last edited by mil-surp60; 11-19-2013 at 10:48 PM.

  12. #19
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Midmichigun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Last On
    01-10-2017 @ 10:06 PM
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    459
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    11:01 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by mil-surp60 View Post
    How long you been collecting arisakas there dude to say you never saw a three screw early model bayo lug ,well here is one i have for sale, 1 long screw in front two small screws in back ,3 screw early model bayo lug for the type 99 well ya seen one now.
    LOL!!
    Ok... I get it Mil.. I thought you were meaning 3 physical holes... side by side by side. I see what you refer to now. So far I haven't taken any of my 99's that far apart to observe what you just showed me!! Thanks!

  13. #20
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    mil-surp60's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Last On
    01-25-2015 @ 10:32 AM
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    115
    Real Name
    David Phillips
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    11:01 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by mil-surp60 View Post
    How long you been collecting arisakas there dude to say you never saw a three screw early model bayo lug ,well here is one i have for sale, 1 long screw in front two small screws in back ,3 screw early model bayo lug for the type 99 well ya seen one now.
    I know these rifles like the back of my hand and own 3 of them so there are three screw model bayo lugs , and two screw models, the two screws started coming along when they had to cut back on materials and cost and btw a lot of the last ditch rifles which is what they are called, had stamped steel parts not like the earley safe ones which were milled, amd they did not do any torture tests on last ditchers did not need to, they allready knew they wer sub quality in comparison , you shoot those old clunkers not me man. very weak, very junkie, and very dangerous to the shooter most times than not.

    ---------- Post added at 11:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:55 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Midmichigun View Post
    LOL!!
    Ok... I get it Mil.. I thought you were meaning 3 physical holes... side by side by side. I see what you refer to now. So far I haven't taken any of my 99's that far apart to observe what you just showed me!! Thanks!
    Well i tried to tell you i know these rifles inside and out and every model ever made of them and own 3, so i have been into many of them.to every little spring and part.There are so many variantions of them i could go on for hours but last ditchers wer called that for a reason, japan wa sat the end of its ability to produce steel and the parts as the factories were all fire bombed quality got worse and worse as 1944 went on untill they were damn near single shot throw aways bye the time we landed on okinawa like my uncle with the 2nd marine div. They found hundred of jap soldiers clinging to their cheaply made crude last ditch rifles with the back of their heads blown off by the bolts.So again i say , research man you are wrong.And hope you do not kill ya self firing those last ditch attempt rifles.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Thoughts on Nagoya Type 99 no series.
    By Anzac15 in forum Japanese Rifles
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-16-2013, 02:26 AM
  2. Nagoya Type 99 2nd series still staked
    By Salt Flat in forum Japanese Rifles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-03-2013, 04:18 PM
  3. My latest Type 99, 7th series Nagoya.
    By Claven2 in forum Japanese Rifles
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-05-2013, 06:29 PM
  4. My complete Nagoya 5th Series Type 99 Arisaka (Photo essay)
    By lthilsdorf in forum Japanese Rifles
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-15-2012, 01:22 PM
  5. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 04-30-2011, 05:48 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts