Bedding opinions

[StLRedbird]

I see many threads relating to the bedding of specific firearms, but nothing relating to a more general question... Is there a consensus regarding re-bedding a milsurp rifle and how that affects its value from a collector's point of view?

It seems to me that the only way to properly complete the job is to free-float the barrel which means altering the front hand guards from their original configuration. That is, by doing so you are altering the correct configuration of the rifle to enhance its accuracy at the expense of its ability to strongly mount a bayonet.

Put simply, is re-bedding a milsurp considered an activity that "Bubba" engages in?

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

[muffett.2008]

Not all barrels function fully floated, e.g. SMLE, as opposed to the No.4.
The SMLE requires pressure to reduce whip.
Mausers are not as finicky, but any alteration from original reduces the collector value.
..........yes to the final question.

[Aragorn243]

My opinion is yes, it does affect the value from a collectors point of view. And I am somewhat less concerned with originality than a lot of people are. I believe in maintenance and that whatever a soldier at the time would have done is fine to do now. Cleaning, keeping rust off, replacing broken parts etc.

Bedding is not original, would not have been done and thus becomes something "bubba" would do.

It will reduce the size of the group that would be interested in owning such a rifle and thus reduce its value.

On the other hand, there are some who would prefer a more accurate rifle that might be interested in it but finding that person would be difficult.

If I want an accurate rifle, I buy one that is designed for that purpose, not a historical piece.