+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Counter bored early 1931 No.4 Mk1 rifle

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Advisory Panel breakeyp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 03:29 PM
    Location
    near Detroit Michigan
    Age
    77
    Posts
    963
    Real Name
    Paul Breakey
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:10 PM

    Counter bored early 1931 No.4 Mk1 rifle

    Ian Skennertonicon asked me to look at some of my early No.1 MkVI and early No.4 rifles. This one surfaced, a 1931 Enfield with a 0.395 inch diameter counter bore, 0.585 inches deep. As the gun is almost new, I suspect it was used as a WWII test bed to determine accuracy following counterboring done to refurbish damaged muzzles.

    Photos could be better but my photo studio is mid point in being totally revised.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    03-24-2024 @ 09:52 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,507
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:10 PM
    I would disagree with that Paul. Trials such as this had already been undertaken during the first war and were found to be of no value for many reasons*. So why repeat the process again? I think a damaged or worn muzzle, counterbored by an enthusiastic amateur later
    *I'll mention some later if anyone really is interested

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Advisory Panel breakeyp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 03:29 PM
    Location
    near Detroit Michigan
    Age
    77
    Posts
    963
    Real Name
    Paul Breakey
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:10 PM
    Thread Starter
    Given the source where I got it, I believe it to be from the Greener Factory Collection. I have been trying for years to obtain a copy of the Navy Arms Catalog of their purchase of the Greener Collection to confirm this. I have another rifle of the same period/condition/source that has a 3/8 inch wide bevel cut on the left side of the receiver from the charger bridge to the rear sight pivot lug. I know the two former owners and they were not machinist tinkerers who would do something like this.

    As far as information from the first war or any other source, the first principle of any large organization is that they don't believe any report that is not current. Many times at Ford I heard, retest it they might not have done it right or we have better what evers now.

  6. #4
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    03-24-2024 @ 09:52 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,507
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:10 PM
    That might be so Paul but trials into the repair of and feasibility of any such repairs to crown damage are well documented, in pages and pages of incoherent blurb within the Ordnance Board papers. Specifically and coincidentally in view of Colonels recent thread in relation to cordwear and, strangely enough, slight shrapnel and inaccuracy due to splinter fragments. And counterboreing was a non starter. Countersinking/crowning was an improvement but with dire reservations that also made it a virtual non starter too.

    One part of the report that I am only relating from idle memory now, was that even countersinkinmg/cutting/re-crowning properly was a very accurate undertaking and if this had to be done at a rear line/ordnance echelon workshop where there was already re-barrelling facilities then why bother recrowning when they were already geared up to totally refurbish?

  7. #5
    Legacy Member Bruce_in_Oz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 04:54 AM
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,237
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    06:10 AM
    I have seen this counter-boring somewhere else and I seem to recall the rifle concerned had come from some dire colonial outpost. I have also seen it on a couple of Sovieticon-built SKS carbines that had been "traded-in" by some interesting Middle-Eastern nation or other.

    As Peter says, a REAL armourer in a REAL workshop, be it field or, much more likely, base, would simply swap out the barrel and then do the proper follow-up on bedding and sighting, etc., etc., or simply flick it further up the food-chain for a total rebuild; (FTR) and get the "Q" store to do a "one for one"..

    Given what a drama it would be to set the thing up in a lathe and do the counterbore properly, it would actually be quicker to change the barrel. (Assuming you are working in a system that has such parts on call).

  8. #6
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    03-20-2024 @ 06:05 AM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,429
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    08:10 PM
    If the rifle came from the UKicon there is another factor that may be relevant here, & that is UK proof law. If I understand things correctly a rifle with a bulged barrel will not pass UK domestic proof & is therefore unsaleable. I have seen a number of weapons that had muzzle bulges that were counter bored by RFD's simply to lose the bulge & so get them through proof. What I am saying is could this counter boring have been done by the civvy trade for purely pecuniary reasons, rather than by the military?

    ATB.
    Last edited by Roger Payne; 07-11-2014 at 03:04 PM. Reason: clarification

  9. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:


  10. #7
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    4,651
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    01:10 PM
    IIRC both the trials No4(T)s that I owned had 'ringed' barrels near the muzzle. Perhaps they were disposed of for that reason, though neither had staked pads for post-war UKicon service.
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. 1931 trial rifle question
    By neubig1970 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 02-11-2014, 06:33 PM
  2. Measuring MW in counter-bored barrels
    By RBruce in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-31-2010, 03:27 PM
  3. 1931 trials rifle
    By yardbird in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 07-27-2009, 02:32 PM
  4. Counter-Bored M1 Barrel
    By musketjon in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-25-2009, 07:56 PM
  5. Barrel Counter Bored......
    By musketjon in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-21-2009, 12:07 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks