+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 52

Thread: 1917 Eddystone Advice

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Contributing Member Aragorn243's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 09:10 PM
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    6,974
    Real Name
    Steve
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    04:22 AM

    1917 Eddystone Advice

    Several years ago I believe I brought my first rifle to the attention of this group. I sought advice on whether it was a good purchase or not considering it's condition. I did end up buying it and over the past few years just never was satisfied with it. The stock was heavily sanded, it has a WWII 2 groove replacement barrel that is pitted and while it looked decent and filled a spot in my collection I kept my eyes open for something better.

    That came along this past weekend. This one also is not perfect but is a huge step up in my opinion. From an exterior inspection, every part could be identified as Eddystone with the exception of the safety lever, and nose cap which had no markings. The barrel is an original 9-18 barrel although it also has pitting. The stock is un-sanded, has the original acceptance stamps and two rebuild/inspection stamps.

    On tearing it down I found replacement parts. A Winchester trigger guard, Remington spring, base plate and trigger and safety.

    Here's where the advice comes in. I'm planning to sell the old one, but it has an Eddystone safety, trigger guard, spring and base plate although all but the safety are in worse shape finish wise than the ones it came with. It unfortunately has a Winchester trigger.

    Is it better to keep it as is with mix matched but better finished parts or swap out all the stuff for the correct Eddystone. The safety is a no brainer, they look the same.

    If swapped out, all that is not Eddystone is the trigger and that shouldn't be hard to find.

    The old one was major mismatch. Remington stock, Remington bolt, etc so nothing lost there by taking a few Eddystone parts off it.

    What to you guys think, I'm leaning toward going all Eddystone.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    mtoms's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Last On
    01-16-2018 @ 09:43 PM
    Location
    Bienville, LA, USA
    Posts
    134
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    02:22 AM
    Go all eddy - won't hurt the old rifle's value but should help the new one

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Legacy Member WarPig1976's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Last On
    01-30-2023 @ 05:49 PM
    Location
    Delaware county, PA just outside Philadelphia.
    Posts
    2,659
    Real Name
    Jeff
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    03:22 AM
    I think I'd go all Eddystone too. That way when you ponder the thing that little voice in your head won't say "yeah but its mismatched" you know what I mean? As you find parts in better shape you'll replace 'em but you'll already be ahead of the game. My 2c's

  6. #4
    Legacy Member vintage hunter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Last On
    @
    Location
    S.C.
    Age
    56
    Posts
    1,680
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    04:22 AM
    Swapping parts just to make it correct would, IMO, be destroying it's history. If they are defective then that's a bit different. If you want an all correct example use the 2 you have now as trading fodder to get it. It is what it is and I'm in favor of leaving it as is, but it's yours to do with as you wish I reckon. Just my .02 worth.

  7. #5
    Contributing Member Aragorn243's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 09:10 PM
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    6,974
    Real Name
    Steve
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    04:22 AM
    Thread Starter
    I'm not big on the "history of the rifle" so not really part of my consideration. The rifles history as I know it today is where and when it was made, where it was refurbished and who owned it before me. That isn't enough to prevent me from swapping out parts.

    Don't get me wrong, I love history or I wouldn't be collecting these in the first place but the concept of leaving things as is just to preserve something which is complete speculation isn't history to me. If it had a paper trail, that's different but very few rifles have a paper trail. I have no idea if the guy that owned it before me swapped out the parts, or the guy before him. I can speculate that the parts were swapped out by the General Motors facility during the WWII refurbishment.

    Sanding the marks off the stock would be destroying it's history, I can't see swapping parts as doing so.

  8. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Aragorn243 For This Useful Post:


  9. #6
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    ssj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Last On
    11-13-2017 @ 01:21 PM
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    651
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    09:22 PM
    Armourers would swap parts in and out so no biggee for you doing the same IMHO. If you are not that bothered about being that correct what about an after market barrel?

  10. #7
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    10:22 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Aragorn243 View Post
    Sanding the marks off the stock would be destroying it's history, I can't see swapping parts as doing so.

    The major feature of M1917 production was that, as far as possible, all parts from 3 different manufacturers should be interchangeable. So no US armourer fixing up M1917s would have worried much about matching E's or R's or W's. Part interchangeablilty was intended to be used to produce as many rifles as possible as fast as possible in the factory, and to keep up the maximum availability of functioning rifles in the field. Especially for the M1917, the snooty collector's attitude of "it's not all matching therefore not original" is historically incorrect. See Ferris "United Statesicon Rifle Model of 1917".

    As to "history", nobody can tell now whether the parts were used in the factory, because delivery shortages required taking parts from one of the other factories, or "officially" swapped by a US armorer at a later date, or even swapped by you or me five minutes ago.

    So go all-Eddy if you like. It's irrelevant for shooting anyway.

  11. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Patrick Chadwick For This Useful Post:


  12. #8
    Contributing Member Aragorn243's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 09:10 PM
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    6,974
    Real Name
    Steve
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    04:22 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by ssj View Post
    Armourers would swap parts in and out so no biggee for you doing the same IMHO. If you are not that bothered about being that correct what about an after market barrel?
    No, an after market barrel would be over the top for me. I believe the barrel is fine, it's just not as clean as I'd like. Rifling is strong and muzzle wear is not excessive.

  13. #9
    Contributing Member Aragorn243's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 09:10 PM
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    6,974
    Real Name
    Steve
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    04:22 AM
    Thread Starter
    Patrick made some good points. I believe I'm going to replace all the internals and items of equal wear/quality with Eddystone. Still a little undecided on the base plate and trigger guard. The difference in wear between the old and new is considerable. The new is nicely parkerized and essentially unblemished. The old is stained, down to bare metal, etc. I may hang on to them until I can find someone that needs those parts and has Eddystone parts of equal quality.

  14. #10
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    10:22 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Aragorn243 View Post
    I believe the barrel is fine, it's just not as clean as I'd like. Rifling is strong and muzzle wear is not excessive.

    So shoot, clean, shoot, clean, shoot, clean...and enjoy!

  15. Thank You to Patrick Chadwick For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. 1917 eddystone
    By steve acre in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-12-2013, 04:41 PM
  2. ? 1917 Eddystone(value/advice/expertise)
    By theinvisibleheart in forum Appraisals, Fakery, Dispute Resolution & Mediation Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-08-2012, 12:18 AM
  3. Should I buy Eddystone 1917
    By Aragorn243 in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 09-26-2012, 04:35 PM
  4. New guy with an old 1917 Eddystone
    By sigp220.45 in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-21-2012, 09:03 PM
  5. Need Advice on a US Model 1917 Eddystone Sporter
    By Cajun72 in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-13-2011, 05:15 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks