+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: No4MK1 T EXPERT OPINIONS NEEDED

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member bros's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 04:03 AM
    Location
    yukon
    Posts
    272
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    12:10 PM

    No4MK1 T EXPERT OPINIONS NEEDED

    I am looking at this T series Lee Enfield. . I would appreciate if you would look at these pictures and give me your opinion. Trying to find out if this is this is the real deal or not (forced match, all original, etc.). The fellow who has this rifle told me he purchased it at least 30yrs ago, he said the chest is in tough shape, straps, wood. One of the pictures shows a wood knot that fell out of the bottom another picture shows a fresh piece missing from the side....the chest is not matching, he thought it came from a Dutch contract T rifle. In regards of price of the overall package, how much of a percentage would this non-matching chest add or subtract given the fact of condition and mis-matched #'s, I may try to purchase it less the chest. He said the condition of the scope and rifle is near mint, the bore is mint.....out of all the T series he said this was the nicest he has seen in regards to condition. I had him pull the butt stock off to verify rifle serial #, as pictures will show. He applied chalk in some instances to highlight serial #'s. Scope, mount, butt stock and rifle bolt are all matching, the mag I don't believe is as no serial #'s can be seen in the picture. On the right side of the receiver you can see the stencilled "No4MK1" why it is not stamped in rather than stenciled? The lower fore stock has been replaced (non-matching serial #) kinda interesting why, as the rest of the wood looks as good as new and authentic but yet it's been replaced. Does this look like it has been done while still in service, and does this de-value the rifle in a substantial way. The "S" stamp on the right side of the receiver looks as it has had a double impression, maybe first impression was not struck hard enough. The scope can is also non-matching but appears to be in very good shape. The sling condition he said has been "well used". This rifle cannot be viewed in person by me as it's way to far to travel so that's why I had him send me all these pictures. If I purchase this rifle I will be shooting it.....do these shoot as well as a Longbranch or vice/versa, or is there really no difference? The price is $6000 Can. To my untrained eye it looks to be a very, very nice rifle.....your thoughts or concerns would really be appreciated. Regards.

    Picture are in the attachments and their are 3 files total .pdf
    Open with program such as adobe reader.

    Moderator Edit: I've added in-line PDF file viewing capability fore those members that don't have an Adobe file reader, or don't know how to view these pics embedded within the poster's PDF files.





    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by Badger; 01-25-2015 at 11:14 AM.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Contributing Member muffett.2008's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Last On
    Today @ 04:58 AM
    Location
    Scone, NSW. Australia
    Posts
    2,163
    Real Name
    kevin muffett
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    06:10 AM
    Well that was fun and games viewing those pic's.
    Looks ok from here, but let the experts check it over.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Contributing Member Seaforth72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last On
    03-26-2024 @ 03:01 AM
    Location
    Richmond, British Columbia, CANADA
    Posts
    366
    Real Name
    Colin MacGregor Stevens, CD
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    12:10 PM
    This rifle is the real deal.

    THE GOOD:
    Matching serial numbers X31660 on rifle, bolt, bracket, butt (scope and rifle SN) and scope!!!! Most buyers never get to see the serial number of the rifle on the butt when buying.
    Has correct "S" for iron sights checked
    Has Correct "TR"
    Has correct "T"
    ENGLAND mark is just an import mark, most have it. Neither good nor bad.
    M47C is wartime code for BSA Shirkey. Most sniper conversions were done on BSAs.
    Scope is last model, the No. 32 Mk III and is the best model and easiest to adjust.
    Back Sight is a correct Singer Mk I with sniper converstion modification

    BAD:
    Chest No 15 MK. I is marked for (T LESS TELESCOPE) and these are usually the unfinished Savage conversions. BUT better this original chest than a replica chest or none at all.
    Chest condition with problems described a after 75 years of bring bashed about, you too would have some dents and chips etc. The chest protects the rifle and scope --- period. They are rarely identifiable as being matched to the rifle.
    Scope case No.8 Mk. I (square corner 2nd pattern) is mismatched and from rifle BSA Shirley 39901 and scope 11220, but is one of three correct types.
    Scope case is missing the carrying strap (this is sadly typical, replicas are available from Moore Leather in Scotland)
    Forestock was changed but old number 34379 (Also off a BSA Shirley) was barred out so it was PROBABLY adjusted to this rifle. Yes the part affects shooting but as key components are matched it is probably OK.
    Rifle is end of war production and was assembled in 1946. This only matters to people who want a rifle that was there and was used in WWII. It could however have been used elsewhere such as the Malayan Emergency, Korean War, Suez 1956 etc.

    I suggest that you do not buy it without the chest. Complete sets are becoming VERY hard to find and chests add to the value. Value will go up faster with the chest. However, if you buy it and decide you do not want the chest, that is your choice (not everyone has the storage space for example or an understanding spouse). I am in need of a No. 15 Mk. I chest and would in interested in that if you decide to part with it. :-)

    Is this set perfect? No, but it is is VERY good. The most important things all match which is critical for shooting. This scope has 1 minute of angle clicks. The earlier scope clicks were each 2 minutes of angle.

    The price is not cheap, but the prices have been rising so it is not outrageous. As most sets are now mismatched scopes/brackets to the rifles, they will never shoot accurately at various ranges as the scope and bracket are not collinated to the barrel (I.e. Not perfectly lined up).

    The face veil and ammo pouches are not the "correct" patterns, but that is negligible.

    Advice: This is a great candidate for shooting, collecting and investing. The critical thing is the rifle/bracket/scope match. Therefore as Peter Laidlericon says it will be a collinated set and should shoot well. By far, most sniper sets for sale in North America have mismatched scopes or no scopes (missing or never had one installed). As a matched basic set this will go up in value much faster and farther than any mismatched set.

    You could wait until a hundred per cent matched one becomes available but "a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush."

    Take care of it, preserve it and do not let Cousin Bubba near it! In other words do not drill holes or cut anything off or throw anything away (veil and mag pouches could stay or go).

  6. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Seaforth72 For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    Legacy Member snipershot1944's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 09:18 PM
    Location
    The occupied Confederacy
    Posts
    224
    Real Name
    David Chandler
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    03:10 PM
    Seaforth gave you a detailed scholarly evaluation of the rifle and kit. I not only agree with him, but I'd gladly step up to buy it should you decide to pass.

  8. #5
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    03-24-2024 @ 09:52 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,507
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    09:10 PM
    Bros....... Ain't looked at the photos as I've seen several but...... It's always worth remembering, and I have said it many, many times - and expect to repeat it many times again that once a No4T or any other weapon of any kind went into an Armourers shop, then from that moment on, it wasn't original. That's because, if it needed to go into the Armourers shop, then by definition, it was going there because there was something wrong with it! You don't take your car to the workshop because it's running as sweet as a nut do you? And in the service lifetime of weapons, based on nothing more than my limited experience with them, then they go through the small unit, larger Field or (all but...) factory level Base Workshops many times in their lives.

    We would think nothing of changing the fore-end as it meant a day on the range the next time the sniper team went. I never saw one in service with a leather sling either. They were the mickey mouse watch of sniper rifles. Looked good but useless when it came to telling the time. And so on............... But I'll keep saying it........

  9. #6
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    03-20-2024 @ 06:05 AM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,429
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    07:10 PM
    Good as gold. You can worry too much about these things like transit case not matching; at least, in my opinion you can. Mind you, I'm not familiar with Canadianicon prices. I, also, would not be surprised if the forend came off another 4T at some point.
    Last edited by Roger Payne; 01-25-2015 at 12:11 PM. Reason: grammatical + addendum

  10. #7
    Legacy Member Ridolpho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last On
    09-27-2022 @ 11:12 PM
    Location
    Province of Alberta, Canada
    Age
    66
    Posts
    1,019
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    01:10 PM
    To those that know, would not an armourer replaced forend always be re-numbered to the rifle? Or would that only occur in the case of FTR at a factory? I noticed this one for sale some time ago but at the price listed I'd assume perfection- it's up there with the highest non-Longbranch prices I've seen here in Canadaicon.

    Ridolpho

  11. Thank You to Ridolpho For This Useful Post:


  12. #8
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    03-24-2024 @ 09:52 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,507
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    09:10 PM
    We would definately re-number a fore-end

  13. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  14. #9
    Contributing Member Seaforth72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last On
    03-26-2024 @ 03:01 AM
    Location
    Richmond, British Columbia, CANADA
    Posts
    366
    Real Name
    Colin MacGregor Stevens, CD
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    12:10 PM
    Correction of typo: BSA Shirley not BSA Shirkey.

    Price is high at CAD $6,000. I paid $75 for one in better condition ... Mind you, that was about 1972! (Sadly fold it later.) Having said that, the fair market value is what a willing buyer and a willing seller agree upon. An American for example can look at that and calculate what that would cost him in "real dollars" ;-) as our Canadianicon dollar is only about 80 cents US right now.

  15. #10
    Legacy Member bros's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 04:03 AM
    Location
    yukon
    Posts
    272
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    12:10 PM
    Thread Starter
    Peter are you suggesting that because this fore-end was not renumbered to the rifle (as you said that in service you would have) there is reason for concern that maybe this fore-end was not replaced at all by an armorer in service and could have well been replaced by whoever????
    I think the price is high too given the fact that the box is not correct and it seems to be in tough shape, the scope can is miss-matched......but hey I think the rifle/scope is real clean and has not been messed with (the screw heads on scope rings and rifle look amazing). The bore is said to be mint and I want a shooter and I've read the horror stories of trying to make miss-matched rifle/scope/mounts shoot...and this one seems to be correct and not messed with so now I have to just decide if I want to pay a premium for a good shooter. We all have made blunders on various rifle dealings over the years and the one that continues to haunt me is selling the "almost" exact same set-up approx 13yrs ago for a mere $1200. It was an elderly friends who had bought it back in the 60's on Younge St in Toronto (can you imagine), he asked me to sell it for him so I took it to a local dealer and what I got I gave it too him. Obviously I should have bought it but I was not into collecting Enfield's at the time. I guess I could try to be more patient and wait for something more correct, but to get all those little ducks in a row I could wait a lifetime and hey I'm not that patient. Thanks for your input so far guys.
    Last edited by bros; 01-26-2015 at 01:44 AM. Reason: additional info

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Photograph of rare Canadian Telescopic Rifles from WWII (Expert opinions wanted)
    By CheesyCigar in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 10-21-2016, 01:10 PM
  2. Winchester 1897 expert needed (copied from shotgun forum)
    By NORTEXED in forum Gunsmithing for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-21-2011, 11:15 AM
  3. winchester 94 expert needed...
    By Chuckindenver in forum Gunsmithing for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-01-2011, 07:24 PM
  4. Help please, Expert M1A Armorer needed
    By shottist in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-19-2010, 06:36 PM
  5. Advice and opinions needed
    By RickM in forum .22 Smallbore
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-29-2009, 10:38 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks