+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Possible USMC 1903?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #11
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 06:06 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,927
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    04-24-2024
    Local Time
    08:40 PM
    No sweat, that's why we're here. There are guys here that will fill in all the blanks if you wait a minute...

    ISBN for the book I have is 0-9603306-1-5 Cut and paste that, be prepared for heart failure when you see what they want for these little books...
    Regards, Jim

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #12
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Richardwv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    09-05-2017 @ 07:24 PM
    Location
    Back Creek Valley, WV
    Posts
    97
    Local Date
    04-24-2024
    Local Time
    11:40 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Detroit-1 View Post
    There has been a lot of debate about shooting low# 03's. If it was me I would not shoot it. Even the military in the 1930's tried to scrap all low # 03's. Research it!
    While it is true that the Army scraped (and Bannerman bought and rebuilt) low # 03s, the Marine Corps did not. As an "oh by the way" quite a number of low # 03s were on Guadalcanal. The records of failures in that time period were compiled and the low # ones were close to twice as likely to fail as the high number ones....but neither approached the odds of being struck by lightening (and although you wouldn't think it by the way folks talk, the high # ones had a failure rate as well.....as do virtually all heavily used military weapons). Since Army scraped them and the Marine Corps (and most of Navy) didn't, a WWII issued to US military low # rifle was 95% certain to have been Marine Corps. Many of these were reworked when turned in by the Marine Corps and became part of the anti-communist military aid shipments to Greece. So the low number ones that were returned from Greece not too long ago were likely MC rifles as well.
    Last edited by Richardwv; 05-02-2015 at 12:35 AM.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #13
    firstflabn
    Guest firstflabn's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Richardwv View Post
    While it is true that the Army scraped (and Bannerman bought and rebuilt) low # 03s, the Marine Corps did not. As an "oh by the way" quite a number of low # 03s were on Guadalcanal....Since Army scraped them and the Marine Corps (and most of Navy) didn't, a WWII issued to US military low # rifle was 95% certain to have been Marine Corps. Many of these were reworked when turned in by the Marine Corps and became part of the anti-communist military aid shipments to Greece. So the low number ones that were returned from Greece not too long ago were likely MC rifles as well.
    I'm the head cheerleader for encouraging looking at the scattered data available to see what can be sniffed out, but what I see here is a series of unsupported conclusions. When using terms like 'many or 'quite a number' or 'likely', the poster owes it to the reader to explain what that means and how it was determined. How many is 'many' - 37, 152, 14 kagillion?

    Further, the assertion is made that the army scrapped something approaching 100% of their low number '03s. I am certain that is incorrect, but would like to understand the thought process leading to the 95% claim.

    New info pops up all the time, so I'm willing to be convinced, but claims such as the above either need to be supported by facts or identified up front as wild guess or opinion.

  6. #14
    Advisory Panel
    Rick the Librarian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last On
    04-09-2023 @ 08:59 PM
    Location
    NW Washington State
    Age
    74
    Posts
    2,301
    Real Name
    Rick Slater
    Local Date
    04-24-2024
    Local Time
    08:40 PM
    Richard,

    The Army did not scrap all their LN M1903s. While I don't have a specific figure, only those rifles with LN receivers that were sent in for major overhaul between 1928 and 1940 were so-treated. I doubt if "95%" of those LN rifles surviving were issued to the Navy and USMC. Undoubtedly a fair percentage but not to that extent.
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

    --George Orwell

  7. #15
    Advisory Panel John Beard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 12:01 AM
    Location
    Sweet Home Alabama
    Posts
    1,064
    Local Date
    04-24-2024
    Local Time
    10:40 PM
    For those who may be interested, here are some hard verifiable numbers and observations:

    Total quantity of low number rifles manufactured: 1,085,000

    Total quantity of low number rifles issued to Navy, USMC, and sold to NRA members, etc: probably no more than 100,000

    Total quantity of low number rifles remaining in the Army: 1,085,000 – 100,000 = 985,000

    Total number of low number rifles scrapped by the Army after 1927: approximately 250,000.

    Total quantity of low number rifles remaining in Army inventory at the beginning of WWII: 985,000 – 250,000 = 735,000

    The Army incurred combat losses during WWI. So the actual quantity was somewhat lower than 735,000, but still very substantial.

    Richardwv’s assertion that the CMPicon Greek low number rifles were almost all USMC issue is erroneous. I worked at the CMP and saw hundreds of Greek low number rifles. Indeed, one of my jobs was to grind off the striker points so the low number rifles couldn't be fired. A few Greek low number rifles were USMC issue, but most were not. I had trouble finding one to buy.

    For what it's worth.

    J.B.
    Last edited by John Beard; 05-03-2015 at 03:02 PM.

  8. The Following 5 Members Say Thank You to John Beard For This Useful Post:


  9. #16
    Legacy Member Calif-Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    10-01-2023 @ 12:52 AM
    Posts
    2,508
    Local Date
    04-24-2024
    Local Time
    10:40 PM
    JB--Thank you. I recall in the early 1990's a huge pile of bolt guns came out of China. Many M1903 rifles were included in this bolt gun deal. I talked to one of the dealers involved and he said the US Army shipped China large numbers of Low Number rifles. They must have been in depots in WWII and they were shipped to China as aid to our ally. I have heard many Low Numbers were returned by the Greeks, as well. Hardly surprising as the Army likely was happy to move them along.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. Is this a real USMC used 1903?
    By jarrodeu in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-03-2011, 01:50 AM
  2. Help! USMC 1903 or not...possible?
    By islandhopper in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-10-2009, 12:40 PM
  3. Help on 1903 w/USMC barrel
    By cuppednlocked in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-31-2009, 12:23 AM
  4. RIA USMC 1903 rifle
    By Kirk in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 05-31-2009, 02:08 PM
  5. USMC sights for the 1903
    By HiredGun in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-06-2009, 08:08 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts