+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 35

Thread: No4Mk1 accuracy

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #11
    Advisory Panel Brian Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last On
    03-15-2024 @ 10:43 AM
    Location
    Edgefield, SC USA
    Posts
    4,035
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    06:11 AM
    All FTR means is that it was basically rebuilt to new condition post WWII which is good from the shooting standpoint. Savage supplied many replacement parts that were in the MoD system so that's what they used in your case. Go over and read Peter's article on this forum about proper fitting of forends. I won't argue that you may have a perceived improvement in the accuracy of your rifle but removing the bearing and floating the muzzle isn't the answer. Your forend may have needed other adjustments since wood does change and will warp, etc with time. The fact is that the No.4 was not originally designed to be free floated at the muzzle. Much more extensive testing and retesting was done by the MoD as Peter states above.

  2. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Brian Dick For This Useful Post:


  3. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  4. #12
    Legacy Member 303carbine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    11-29-2023 @ 12:55 PM
    Location
    Vancouver Island BC
    Posts
    50
    Real Name
    John Stewart
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    03:11 AM
    Thread Starter
    Hi Brian, I got an answer to an email that I sent to Ian Skennertonicon, I asked him about the bedding of the No4 barrel.
    He replied that the muzzle bedding was eliminated during the war years as it was not a problem as it was with the No1Mk111 rifle.
    I got the feeling he really wants to sell me another book.
    The No5 is No1

  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #13
    Advisory Panel Brian Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last On
    03-15-2024 @ 10:43 AM
    Location
    Edgefield, SC USA
    Posts
    4,035
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    06:11 AM
    I've had hundreds of No.4 rifles through here and I've never seen a wartime No.4 free floated at the muzzle except for some Indian owned rifles, (including a nice No.4Mk.1T), so I seriously doubt it was a common practice in Britishicon and Commonwealth service even though there was a wartime relaxation of standards. It's all about barrel harmonics otherwise known in layman's terms as the "tuning fork effect". I'd suggest that you read post #9 again and then read, reread and then read again the article on proper forend fitting written for this forum and this forum only by Peter Laidlericon who actually worked on these rifles during his long career as a REAL REME Armourer in the British Army. I know Ian very well and he writes fine books but there's a big difference. I've been learning to do this work for well over twenty years and as I said before, I'm still learning and will never be an expert.

  7. Thank You to Brian Dick For This Useful Post:


  8. #14
    Legacy Member 303carbine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    11-29-2023 @ 12:55 PM
    Location
    Vancouver Island BC
    Posts
    50
    Real Name
    John Stewart
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    03:11 AM
    Thread Starter
    I have no doubt that there is a correct amount of upward pressure and I will revisit it and do some shimming to find the correct pressure for my rifle.
    I shot it before doing anything to it at all, it was after I removed the wood at the muzzle did the accuracy dramatically improve, perhaps there was too much upward muzzle bearing.
    There is still a bit of pressure, just not the upward 45 lbs or so it had, there was also some wood warping causing pressure on one side of the wood as well.
    I am going to place two targets side by side at 50 yds and try 10 rounds off the bench as it is, then I am going to add a small shim under the muzzle that will be close to 5 lb and shoot another 10 rounds.
    The No5 is No1

  9. #15
    Legacy Member 303carbine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    11-29-2023 @ 12:55 PM
    Location
    Vancouver Island BC
    Posts
    50
    Real Name
    John Stewart
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    03:11 AM
    Thread Starter
    I had a good read of Mr. Laidlers articles on fore end fitting, it makes a lot of sense and I will be trying his methods. 3 to 7lbs sounds more realistic than the 45 lb that was there due to warping of the fore end.
    I found another high spot in the No4 barrel channel, the article said the barrel needed to be free all the way to the tip.
    I relieved the small pressure point on the side of the barrel, now there appears to be appropriate amount of upward muzzle pressure.
    I am going to have to do some reloading and more testing this weekend when I get the chance.
    The No5 is No1

  10. Thank You to 303carbine For This Useful Post:


  11. #16
    Legacy Member 303carbine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    11-29-2023 @ 12:55 PM
    Location
    Vancouver Island BC
    Posts
    50
    Real Name
    John Stewart
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    03:11 AM
    Thread Starter
    Over the past two days I have been testing the No4 again, I applied the bedding as per Mr. Laidlers instructions.
    I tested the rifle with the same rest, same ammo , same distance, same target on two consecutive days.
    First off with the bedded rifle, I shot a dismal four inch group at 55 yds with 174 grain Hornady's over 37 grains of IMR 3031.
    Next day with the bedding removed and barrel tip free floated, same target etc., I shot another four shot group, I shot a triangular group that measured
    1& 1/4 inch x 1 & 1/4 inch x 3/8ths inch with two bullets touching.
    I guess my rifle just doesn't like the bedding at the tip.
    The No5 is No1

  12. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to 303carbine For This Useful Post:


  13. #17
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    brent65's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Last On
    04-06-2019 @ 05:47 AM
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    35
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    09:11 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Laidlericon View Post
    Mmmmmmmmmm. I wonder just how accurate your now muzzle bearing-less No4 rifle would shoot if it were to be subject to something more scientific. Scientific like the post war trials held to ascertain the most accurate and reliable method of stocking up. Or tested from an Enfield Rest which is designed to eliminate all traces of human interference, however small.

    The strange part about your findings is that they clash with the 1946/7 trials NOT of the No4T sniper rifle, but the bog standard rifle which clearly and distinctly states that the wartime expedient of eliminating the muzzle bearing will cease forthwith. Or words to that effect. Just my view of course, probably shared by one or two others I'd say
    So what's your opinion on the target shooters using mid or centre bearing bedding with fully floated front on No4's then? Seemed to be the method of choice back in the day and used by just about everybody that was remotely competitive also was the bedding method of choice by Parker Hale.
    Last edited by brent65; 01-03-2016 at 05:24 AM.

  14. #18
    Contributing Member CINDERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 08:42 AM
    Location
    South West Western Australia
    Posts
    7,730
    Real Name
    CINDERS
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    06:11 PM
    So what 1 No.4 dislikes (Front pressure) another may just love so I say it is what it is.
    Last edited by CINDERS; 09-15-2016 at 12:51 AM.

  15. #19
    Legacy Member rayg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Last On
    03-08-2024 @ 08:57 AM
    Location
    US
    Posts
    1,053
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    04:11 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by 303carbine View Post
    Over the past two days I have been testing the No4 again, I applied the bedding as per Mr. Laidlers instructions.
    I tested the rifle with the same rest, same ammo , same distance, same target on two consecutive days.
    First off with the bedded rifle, I shot a dismal four inch group at 55 yds with 174 grain Hornady's over 37 grains of IMR 3031.
    Next day with the bedding removed and barrel tip free floated, same target etc., I shot another four shot group, I shot a triangular group that measured
    1& 1/4 inch x 1 & 1/4 inch x 3/8ths inch with two bullets touching.
    I guess my rifle just doesn't like the bedding at the tip.
    It appears as though every rifle has a mind of it's own, Ray Attachment 68427

  16. Thank You to rayg For This Useful Post:


  17. #20
    Contributing Member 30Three's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 05:12 PM
    Location
    France
    Posts
    809
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    11:11 AM
    Some rifles that have been worked on by Fulton's of Bisley do not have the up pressure at the muzzle. However they have moved the up pressure bedding to further down the barrel so it still has up pressure, just not in the same place. I have a Fultons No4 M1icon/2 and the muzzle definitely has clearance in all directions. That said; they are the exceptions to the rule. The standard rifle has the pressure applied at the muzzle. This is also true of the No1. But the up pressure needs to be set after checking the contact at the draws and under the knox form etc; it is one part of the puzzle that is Enfield accuracy!

  18. Thank You to 30Three For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. No4MK1 T
    By bros in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 06-03-2023, 08:43 PM
  2. New No4mk1/2
    By McCraggen in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 09-19-2011, 11:08 AM
  3. No4Mk1 SMLE?
    By Garandrew in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-01-2011, 10:05 PM
  4. My new No4Mk1(t)
    By Garandrew in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-13-2011, 02:46 PM
  5. 1943 LB No4Mk1*
    By ctag2010 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-15-2011, 03:06 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks