Springfield Trapdoor Information

[Dick Hosmer]

Further correction (sorry):

NO rifles were ever marked "1878", though it is an easy mistake because some really do look as if they are. However, in ALL cases, the last digit is a too-deep "3". It is not clear whether this was due to a bad die, too much pressure, block slightly "out of gauge" (too thick) or what. Also, it is entirely proper to see the 1873 date well into 1887, as older blocks - which were identical save for the date - were used until supply was exhausted. The "1884" blocks appear well after the adoption of the model change, which basically referred to the new "Buffington" rear sight, as nothing else was changed at that time.

[pjohn]

First off, I believe you. I've checked other references and of course you're correct. But, I'll tell you, I had it under a magnifying glass and it looks like an 8. So, it's a Model 1873, very nice. So again thanks for the great info.

[butlersrangers]

When I was a young collector, we learned the Block Marking was "1873", but, looked like "78" on 'low-arch' Trap-door breech-blocks. I always assumed some wear or damage had occurred to the Stamping-Die.

[Dick Hosmer]

Chuck, not all low-arch 1873 blocks have the issue - there are two font sizes, and the earlier (smaller) one is always crystal-clear. More to follow, after Christmas. And, a Merry one to all!!