+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: a question about Myths and Truths of No.1 EY Rifles (by Peter Laidler)

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member henry r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Last On
    09-20-2021 @ 07:13 AM
    Location
    northern tablelands nsw Australia
    Posts
    633
    Real Name
    henry.
    Local Date
    04-20-2024
    Local Time
    01:33 AM

    a question about Myths and Truths of No.1 EY Rifles (by Peter Laidler)

    the article https://www.milsurps.com/content.php...-Peter-Laidler) states that the wire was done with the butt removed, but after the wire is done, the fore-end is permanently fixed hence the fore-end couldn't be removed to refit the butt.

    if removing the butt off a no1 mk3 with the fore-end on will damage the fore-end, how can you replace the butt without causing the same damage?

    thanks.
    henry.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Legacy Member Bindi2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 09:08 AM
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    1,446
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    10:33 PM
    Cut the square off the end of the bolt so it can be screwed in without damage to the forend. Needs a spring washer put on the bolt.

  4. Thank You to Bindi2 For This Useful Post:


  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #3
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    04-13-2024 @ 05:00 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,510
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    03:33 PM
    Use a No4 stock bolt, Leave the tie plate out - but as I seem to recall, our later rifles didn't have tie plates. Please feel free to correct me.

  7. Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  8. #4
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 05:37 AM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,437
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    03:33 PM
    I think this point came up recently in another thread. The Indians produced modified forends for the SMLE later on in which the stock bolt keeper plate was dispensed with & a simple tie plate as per the No4 Mk1 forend was used. This also meant that the simplified (no squared off bit on the front end) No4 stock bolt could be employed. As mentioned above though, a Thackray type spring washer was required to tension it all.
    Last edited by Roger Payne; 05-05-2016 at 02:38 PM. Reason: typo

  9. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:


  10. #5
    Legacy Member Sentryduty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Last On
    02-07-2022 @ 11:09 AM
    Location
    Edmonton, AB, Canada
    Posts
    1,057
    Real Name
    Darren
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    07:33 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Roger Payneicon View Post
    The Indians produced modified forends for the SMLE later on in which the stock bolt keeper plate was dispensed with & a simple tie plate as per the No4 Mk1 forend was used. This also meant that the simplified (no squared off bit on the front end) No4 stock bolt could be employed.
    My "de-sporter" 1918 No1 Mk 3 project rifle employs one of these exact stock sets and bolts, I was a bit concerned that I might have damaged something during my assembly when the square stock bolt discussion came up as I could not remember observing anything of the sort. I disassembled the rifle and happily discovered I had one of the later Indian sets as you describe.
    - Darren
    1 PL West Nova Scotia Regiment 2000-2003
    1 BN Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry 2003-2013

  11. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Sentryduty For This Useful Post:


  12. #6
    Legacy Member 5thBatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    04-06-2024 @ 11:48 PM
    Location
    Zombie Town, now with a H
    Posts
    774
    Local Date
    04-20-2024
    Local Time
    02:33 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Roger Payneicon View Post
    I think this point came up recently in another thread. The Indians produced modified forends for the SMLE later on in which the stock bolt keeper plate was dispensed with & a simple tie plate as per the No4 Mk1 forend was used. This also meant that the simplified (no squared off bit on the front end) No4 stock bolt could be employed. As mentioned above though, a Thackray type spring washer was required to tension it all.
    The Indians did away with the keeper plate before the introduction of the tie plate & simply put a spring washer on the stockbolt, externally the forend looked the same as any Britishicon or Australianicon made rifle.
    The forend on my 1927 Ishapore, it is numbered to the rifle but cant guarantee the forend dates to 1927 as it could have been replaced

    Last edited by 5thBatt; 05-05-2016 at 05:07 PM.

  13. The Following 7 Members Say Thank You to 5thBatt For This Useful Post:


  14. #7
    Legacy Member henry r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Last On
    09-20-2021 @ 07:13 AM
    Location
    northern tablelands nsw Australia
    Posts
    633
    Real Name
    henry.
    Local Date
    04-20-2024
    Local Time
    01:33 AM
    Thread Starter
    thanks gentlemen. i figured there had to be some sort of modification but wasn't sure what.

    was the flat stock bolt washer simply replaced with a no4 thackeray washer? (i had never heard the name before now, though i had seen them)

    i love this place, not only do you get the answer but a heap more useful information at the same time.

  15. #8
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    04-13-2024 @ 05:00 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,510
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    03:33 PM
    Definately NO! The flat stock bolt washer must ALWAYS be used. This is what prevents the bolt or thackray washer ( also called a double coil spring washer) from churning up the wood on which it seats inside the butt

  16. The Following 6 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  17. #9
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    CowboyBillWatts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Last On
    04-15-2019 @ 08:51 AM
    Location
    Dadeville, Missouri, USA
    Posts
    26
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    09:33 AM
    Attachment 72870

    the indians went from this to the rear tie plate. so did the ishapore factory continue to have draws problems with splits and such? did this application not work at all?

  18. #10
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    04-13-2024 @ 05:00 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,510
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    03:33 PM
    No, they didn't go FROM that (pic in thread 9) to the squared tie plate. They went from the squared tie plate TO the No4 type shown in fin 9. I would think that they decided, in their wisdom, that the tie plate idea used on the No4 rifle fore-ends PLUS the standard No4 rifle stock bolt (without the squared-off thread) was a better idea than the original tie plate that locked the stock bolt. The additional bonus was that it made the stock bolts and No4 type tie plates standard across the range. Just my view of course.

  19. Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Myths and Truths of No.1 EY Rifles (by Peter Laidler)
    By Badger in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 01-08-2009, 07:28 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts