+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Naval Contract Lanchester/1907 bayonets???

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Contributing Member Flying10uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 10:53 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,075
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:13 PM

    Naval Contract Lanchester/1907 bayonets???

    Does anyone know if there is any such thing as a "Naval Contract" 1907 bayonet for the Lanchester SMG, please? If there is how would such a bayonet be distinguished, apart from any obvious naval markings? This question has recently arisen and I am inclined to think that there is no such thing, however, I don't really know if there is or there isn't. I've seen 1907 bayonets marked for RAF and these appear exactly the same as army issue and logic would tell me the same would be true for the Royal Navy? I've looked through previous threads but can't see anything specific to this question. Thanks for any information.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Legacy Member peregrinvs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Last On
    03-22-2024 @ 05:41 PM
    Location
    Hertfordshire, UK
    Age
    50
    Posts
    536
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:13 PM
    Yes. Naval contract ones were marked both WSC and S/294 on the ricasso. Of course that doesn't mean that only bayonets with those markings were physically issued with Lanchesters.
    Nature and nature's laws lay hid in night;
    God said "Let Newton be!" and all was light.

  4. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to peregrinvs For This Useful Post:


  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #3
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    03-24-2024 @ 09:52 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,507
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    12:13 AM
    Personally, I and many others have always doubted that bayonets marked like this (Peregrine, thread 2) were solely Naval contract. I would suggest that there was simply a rolling contract with WSC for No1 bayonets during the war and all 3x services needed them! Some went to the Navy, most went to the Army and one or two went to the RAF! Simple as that. Unless someone goes to the Birmingham City archives (I think WSC's are at the Inst of Science and Technology museum.....) and finds that WSC made solely for the Navy.

    A bit like the M48 - 49 - 50 No9 bayonet myth

    Just been asked by PM to quantify my reason a but further. It's just that the idea of No1 bayonets obviously made at WSC after the introduction of wartime codes were for the Navy is tooooooo general a statement for whoever initially stated it was so. I could go on but....... Or could it be a good sales pitch for a dealer with a a couple of dozen so marked to make a killing? As far as the then Admiralty, Air Ministry and the War Department were concerned, a No1 bayonet was a No1 bayonet and WSC supplied what the old MoS contracted and paid for. Same as L1A1 bayonets later

  7. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  8. #4
    Contributing Member Flying10uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 10:53 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,075
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:13 PM
    Thread Starter
    I'd always thought that it was probably as Peter suggests in Post 3, with regards to naval 1907 bayonets, until this question of Naval Contract 1907 bayonets" cropped up recently. I do have a late production 1907 by WSC but haven't paid that much attention to the markings. I just assumed it to be a late production 1907 bayonet made for the U.K. government to be used by which ever branch of the armed forces needed it. I'd better have a better look at the markings.

  9. #5
    Contributing Member Flying10uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 10:53 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,075
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:13 PM
    Thread Starter

    May 1942 1907 Bayonet by Wilkinson.

    Here is my late production 1907 bayonet, dated May 1942. There appears to be no dispersal code probably because it's slightly too old and I can't see anything to specifically define the branch of service that it may have been issued to.

    Later edit. Is anyone able to offer any sort of explanation why if this bayonet were to have the dispersal code of S294 marked on it, it would make it more likely to have been used by the Royal Navy, please?
    Last edited by Flying10uk; 01-13-2017 at 01:11 PM.

  10. #6
    Contributing Member Flying10uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 10:53 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,075
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:13 PM
    Thread Starter
    For comparison, here is an example picture of the markings of a WW2 1907 bayonet by Wilkinson with the "S294" marking.

  11. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    old-smithy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    10-16-2017 @ 07:26 AM
    Location
    Houston Texas
    Age
    67
    Posts
    481
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    05:13 PM
    I have always believed the combination of the S294 and Wilkinson were specific to the Naval Lanchester contract, as i have other bayonets with one or other of the markings and that it was a fairly limited run

  12. #8
    Advisory Panel green's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    12-22-2023 @ 08:18 PM
    Posts
    445
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    05:13 PM
    Wilkinson produced about 121000 P1907 bts from 1941 and total Lanchester production was 80790.
    The 1941 WSC contract, 34707, was for the RN.

  13. Thank You to green For This Useful Post:


  14. #9
    Contributing Member Flying10uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 10:53 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,075
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:13 PM
    Thread Starter
    The picture in post 6 I found by chance online while looking for something else and it was suggested that it was a "Naval Contract" 1907 because it had the dispersal code of S294. One would expect any "Naval Contract" 1907 bayonets procured before the introduction of the dispersal code system not to have the code marked on it. I don't, personally, see the connection between having the dispersal code and it indicating "Naval Contract".

  15. #10
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    03-24-2024 @ 09:52 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,507
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    12:13 AM
    Nope....... nor do I (thread 9, last sentence)
    Thread 8: By 34707, do you mean that was a) the number of bayonets or b) that was the MoS contract number? (By 1941 and the fact that these bayonets had a MoS wartime code indicate that it was the Ministry of Supply who awarded the contracts to the ROF's and industrial suppliers following a demand from whoever was in need by the way). And in any case what earthly evidence - even if there is any - is that these were for Lanchesters! And by the 4/44 date on the example shown, the Lanchester was obsolescent. Nope......, the pragmatic and common sense part of me suggests that while a MoS contract with WSC for No1 bayonets was instigated by the Admiralty, bayonets are bayonets and they could and certainly would have been used for anything - and by everyone. It was just another quantity wartime contract to a grateful supplier!

    The WSC files are at the B/ham museum of Science and Technology

    It's like saying that MG contracted PSF for for 2,000 MGB doors or boot lids etc for MGC's - or 10,000 10" wheels were for Mini Coopers when they were exactly the same as MGB's or standard mini's

  16. Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Lanchester Mk1 SMG
    By Brit plumber in forum Other LMG/HMG and SMG Forum
    Replies: 125
    Last Post: 09-24-2020, 04:54 PM
  2. Lanchester
    By Peter Laidler in forum Other LMG/HMG and SMG Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 05-14-2016, 07:38 AM
  3. Lanchester SMG Stripping Tool?
    By peregrinvs in forum Other LMG/HMG and SMG Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-13-2014, 06:52 AM
  4. Lee Enfield Markings CNF ? Cadet Naval Force or CommonWealth Naval Forces?
    By terryinvictoria in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-19-2013, 04:51 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks