-
Advisory Panel
has anyone ever used the battle sight on an M16A2/M4? I have to use the long range aperture as the battle sight is like looking through a garbage can with the bottom kicked out. Perfect for running through the bush snap shooting but not much good on bullseyes off the bench.
Only for low light shooting and then it's more instinctive shooting. We even taught to use the longer range aperture for deliberate shooting.
-
The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post:
-
01-21-2017 08:05 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
Advisory Panel
Originally Posted by
nzl1a1collector
John H Turner, if you look at the underside of your sight what number is stamped on the main parts? Mine is numbered '18' It came from the
UK
a number of years ago, I managed to get it off of that wonderful auction site.
Here's the rare
Australian NRA Target Rifle. There is no magazine well and the majority of machining operations to the receiver weren't done, it a huge lump of steel a lot stronger than the L1A1 Body. The problem with them was they were a straight pull rifle and when up against the conventional Omark Target rifles it lost out. About 130 rifles were made in both left and right handed versions.
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...8dsedqad-1.jpg
I owned one for a while...it's now either in a gov't reference collection, or been smelted...
-
-
PM
