1943 Long Branch No.4 Mk1*

**Fussyboy/51** · 03-05-2017 10:13 AM

Good morning one and all, Just introducing myself to the group. Located in Ottawa Canada icon

and have been using this great site to get some info on my new purchase that came yesterday. Managed to pick up a 1943 Long Branch No.4 Mk1*. The serial number however did not fall within the expected range according to info I have read. Serial No. 88L0103 on the action and same on the bolt. Could the number be that far off from the numbers listed in Charles Stratton book?

Information

Warning: This is a relatively older thread
This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

**Highly Recommended** · 03-05-2017 10:13 AM

A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered. Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping. In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail. I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!). CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping.

Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles.

Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons

Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components.

Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear.

Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.

**rgg_7** · 03-05-2017 12:17 PM

88L is within the 1945 production year. Can you post a picture of the left side wall that shows the markings as well as the serial number on the butt socket. Something strange going on. Ron

**Fussyboy/51** · 03-05-2017 01:02 PM

I agree it is strange but this is what is shown on the rifle. Here are images of the numbers. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

**rgg_7** · 03-05-2017 01:21 PM

It's had a 1945 bolt installed at sometime in the past. The receiver has be restamped to match the bolt. Generally the other way around. See the position of the"88" to the relationship of the remainder of the SN. Interesting. Ron

**Fussyboy/51** · 03-05-2017 01:43 PM

Thanks Ron. The rest of the gun looks normal to what should be there and is in good shape although the rifling is wore alot. Good to go with the bayonets.

**S-A-M3** · 03-06-2017 11:45 PM

All books can only be a guide, the Charles Stratton books in particular seem to be full of inaccuracies.

**Surpmil** · 03-07-2017 12:22 AM

Originally Posted by rgg_7

It's had a 1945 bolt installed at sometime in the past. The receiver has be restamped to match the bolt. Generally the other way around. See the position of the"88" to the relationship of the remainder of the SN. Interesting. Ron

Will have to respectfully disagree about that: the "L0103" on the butt socket is original. The "88" is clearly a later over-stamping of the first two digits of the original SN; not even the correct sized stamps. The bolt is a complete renumber and another number was filed off first, so it is a re-used bolt, and looks like the hand of Bubba was upon it.

Why the SN on the socket was over-struck is anyone's guess: someone who liked "88", wanted to obscure the number of an "acquired" rifle, thought they knew what the SN "should be", etc. etc.

**browningautorifle** · 03-07-2017 12:22 PM

Originally Posted by Surpmil

The "88" is clearly a later over-stamping of the first two digits of the original SN; not even the correct sized stamps. The bolt is a complete renumber and another number was filed off first, so it is a re-used bolt, and looks like the hand of Bubba was upon it.

I agree. The bolt has been filed and renumbered. You can see all sorts of different previous numbers.

**Peter Laidler** · 03-07-2017 02:12 PM

But we should also add that there's nothing wrong with re-using a bolt providing that it's fittedCORRECTLY and you can get CHS with it. A bit more to it than that of course - but the principle of re-use is acceptable

**browningautorifle** · 03-07-2017 10:27 PM

Originally Posted by Peter Laidler

the principle of re-use is acceptable

Most certainly, no arguments...we're just trying to suss out the odd number.

Thread: 1943 Long Branch No.4 Mk1*

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Display

New to Milsurps

1943 Long Branch No.4 Mk1*

Thank You to rgg_7 For This Useful Post:

The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Surpmil For This Useful Post:

Similar Threads

1943 Long Branch No. 4 Mk 1* Oiler

Question on a Long Branch 1943

shooting with a 1943 Long Branch nr4 mk 1*

1943 Long Branch?

1943 Long Branch #4 MK 1*

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions