+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Early '03 Springfield question

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    sn@abrc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Last On
    11-06-2019 @ 07:35 AM
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    5
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:38 PM

    Question Early '03 Springfield question

    Gidday fellas,

    A few weeks ago, one of my rifle club members happily turned up at our range with his "new" very early production '03 Springfield.
    I had a quick look at the rifle - it appeared in good nick, barrel was clean and shiny inside and all seemed fine.
    I was down operating targets when he took his first [and only] shot - the handguard was blown off and shattered with some bits landing in the bush off to the left and other bits landing near fellow shooters to his right.
    There was found to be a fine hole drilled in the barrel which had vented gas upwards - blowing the handguard off the rifle.

    Funnily enough - he still managed to hit the target from 400 yards!

    We presumed the club member had mistakenly been sold an old rendered innocuous rifle - as it was sold as being a shooter / not a wall hanger and was even certified as being safe to use by the dealer.

    A few days ago, I heard on the grapevine that apparently very early production '03 Springfield rifles were found to have "metallurgically weak actions", so the barrel had a fine hole drilled forward of the chamber to vent some of the pressure - with a hole in the handguard lining up to allow the vented gas to escape.

    If this is true - I guess at some time in the past, the hand guard had been replaced and the hole forgotten about, with the rifle being sold on without anyone spotting the holey barrel.

    I cannot find anything to confirm this practice of barrel drilling - can anyone assist?
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 10:04 AM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,838
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    07:38 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by sn@abrc View Post
    a fine hole drilled forward of the chamber to vent some of the pressure - with a hole in the handguard lining up to allow the vented gas to escape.
    Quote Originally Posted by sn@abrc View Post
    I cannot find anything to confirm this practice of barrel drilling
    No. There's a Hatcher hole in the side of the action but not in the barrel. That would just be silly... That rifle was deactivated and then put back to shooting without ever being checked. That's a lawsuit to whom ever verified it safe.
    Regards, Jim

  4. Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post:


  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #3
    Legacy Member butlersrangers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last On
    03-26-2024 @ 09:38 PM
    Location
    S.E. Michigan, U.S.A.
    Posts
    737
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:38 AM
    I agree with BAR. A hole drilled into the barrel was some strange, ill thought out, and dangerous attempt to deactivate this 1903 Springfield. It was not likely done officially in U.S. service.

    The 'gas escape hole' was originally on the right-side of 1903 Springfield receivers. (Interestingly, the 1900 experimental Springfield rifle had gas escape holes on both sides of receiver).

    I suppose the right-side gas escape hole was thought to vent gases, from a failed cartridge case, away from the shooter's face. Some extractors have a small hole that lines up with the hole in the receiver.

    I think the "Hatcher Hole" was adopted around 1936. It was incorporated into new actions and added to earlier Springfield rifles during 'Rebuild'. Major Julian Hatcher wisely realized the bolt gas escape hole was on the left-side and could now line up with his added hole.

    1903-A3 actions have the gas escape hole on the left-side.

  7. Thank You to butlersrangers For This Useful Post:


  8. #4
    Legacy Member mark1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-25-2024 @ 09:44 AM
    Location
    Heading for Florida
    Posts
    351
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    08:38 AM
    This goes to show, you need to do a complete inspection that includes removing the wood. Also, I always check the head spacing, no matter what others say.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Early 1903 Springfield
    By pigeonman in forum Appraisals, Fakery, Dispute Resolution & Mediation Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 06-24-2012, 06:29 PM
  2. Rear sight question for an early springfield
    By pete-z in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-02-2011, 09:27 PM
  3. Springfield M-1. Late January, early February 1942
    By tda003 in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-05-2010, 05:10 PM
  4. EARLY Springfield Stock Bolt ??'s
    By Mike Haas in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-08-2009, 09:57 PM
  5. Springfield M1A early years?
    By snell in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-03-2009, 02:50 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks