+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 54

Thread: Grease groove in WWII .303 bullets important or not ?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #21
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 08:47 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,908
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    06:05 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by green View Post
    BAR can you back your assertion with documents?
    Physical evidence. Note everyone else has abandoned your fruitless argument, because they realise you can't be helped. I too join them. It's a sealant he sees...
    Regards, Jim

  2. Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post:


  3. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  4. #22
    Contributing Member rcathey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Last On
    04-16-2024 @ 02:11 PM
    Location
    St. Louis, MO Area
    Posts
    1,645
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    08:05 PM
    I'm a bit lost here and I think it's a terminology issue.
    Jim, are you saying "Yes, it's beeswax" and "No, it's not for lube it's for a sealant."
    Am I following you right?
    In which case, it's not an argument of tar vs. beeswax, it's an argument of lube vs. sealant. Right?

    I think some interesting facts have been shared by everyone here for it to all get lost on a matter of terminology.

  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #23
    Advisory Panel Brian Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last On
    04-17-2024 @ 05:05 PM
    Location
    Edgefield, SC USA
    Posts
    4,045
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    09:05 PM
    I just pulled a projectile from a 1941 DAC Canadianicon Mk.7 cartridge and sure enough, it has a greenish beeswax mix in the cannelure. I also pulled a post war Mk.8z round and it has the tar sealer. I'd guess that the beeswax mix was still considered a sealant and not a lubricant but I could be wrong. I always thought that lubricant in the bullet groove was from the cast lead bullet era but I'm no ammo expert by a long shot, (pardon the pun!).

  7. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Brian Dick For This Useful Post:


  8. #24
    Legacy Member Daan Kemp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Last On
    Today @ 01:41 PM
    Location
    Centurion RSA
    Age
    73
    Posts
    1,397
    Real Name
    Daan Kemp
    Local Date
    04-20-2024
    Local Time
    03:05 AM
    Very interesting

    Wonder what "power" other "major militaries" used if 303 was the lowest? Would be interesting to compare apples with apples, ie same year of manufacture standard military ammo, same weight bullet, pressure specs, etc.

    I wonder who decided the Enfield is a weak action? Just because it isn't Mauser based? I know the Brits wanted to replace it, with the P14/17 being the eventual result. However, they never took it further after WWI.
    Would be interesting to compare action length after similar shots fired, headspacing problems with the Mauser based actions, etc. Apples with apples. Seemed to work very well over 60 years of use.

    Seems ammunition manufacturing changes over the years. What worked in WWI probably changed by WWII. My 303 cartridge knowledge starts with 1943 South African made, up to late seventies. Some 215gr made in 1926. No cannelure, no grease. However I don't profess to have one of every lot made by the various factories, we all know in Lee Enfield and 303 anything is possible.

    If all this was common knowledge we wouldn't be having this discussion. Bob seems to have a lot to share, and I for one would like to hear more from him. I don't have to agree but I can learn.

  9. Thank You to Daan Kemp For This Useful Post:


  10. #25
    Legacy Member BruceHMX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    09-15-2020 @ 11:28 PM
    Location
    King George VA
    Posts
    160
    Real Name
    Bruce
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    09:05 PM
    Perhaps it was a groove for pig fat left over from the bygone days of fighting fuzzies someone forgot to tell the folks at Birmingham to remove it

  11. #26
    Advisory Panel green's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    12-22-2023 @ 08:18 PM
    Posts
    445
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    08:05 PM
    I have pulled bullets on many .303" sevice ctgs from 1890s to mid 1940s manufacture and they all had grease/wax in the cannelure.
    From "Text Book of Ammunition 1944" The War Office Feb 1944 page 4 "the beeswax or lanolin compositions used in the cannelure , and frequently referred to as lubricants, today serve the much more important purpose of waterproofing the round"
    For those who have actually to disassembled a ctg and post their findings I thank you.

  12. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to green For This Useful Post:


  13. #27
    Legacy Member Bruce_in_Oz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last On
    04-17-2024 @ 02:04 AM
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,241
    Local Date
    04-20-2024
    Local Time
    11:05 AM
    Some sort of seal inside the neck was essential because of the way the round was assembled.

    I have posted the process in detail before, but unlike "modern" ammo, the bullet was inserted BEFORE the neck was fully formed.

    The "Britishicon Way":

    The Cordite propellant was inserted as a "bundle" and then topped with a "glaze-board" (fancy cardboard) disc, BEFORE the main body of the case was tapered.

    The bullet was then 'dropped on top of that disc and THEN the case was necked.

    Thus two things that caused later problems:

    1. The neck was NOT annealed after forming (try annealing a cease full of propellant sometime). Therefore it retained all of the interesting stresses from that operation.

    2. The neck could NEVER have the sort of "spring-grip" so familiar to modern hand-loaders, and thus required an additional method of sealing / "water-proofing" the complete cartridge.

    The stab-crimps are a sort-of primitive form of "collet crimping".

    This whole process was a hang-over from the days of the rolled-brass foil 577-450 Martini Henry cartridge. That beast was loaded with a solid, compressed pellet of black powder before the "bottle-neck" was formed.

    Note that Mk7Z and Mk8Z did things differently, because of the granular propellant used.

    U.S. contract .303, Boxer-primed and loaded with granular powders on high-speed machines, also had NO glaze-board disc; totally different method of "assembly". The Canadians did both "country" and "western". "Government" production was done British style, eg. DA/DAC, (Dominion Arsenals), whereas commercial contractors like Defence Industries, (DI), did it U.S. style. (Non-mercuric Boxer primers, granulated NC propellant and so on).

    The ammo gurus will have more (and better) details.


    Modern 5.56 NATO ammo also has a black "sealant" inside the neck.

    Even the Norinco clone of 5.56 M-193 has this same sort of sealant. (And lacquer-sealed primer pockets.)

  14. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Bruce_in_Oz For This Useful Post:


  15. #28
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 08:47 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,908
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    04-19-2024
    Local Time
    06:05 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by green View Post
    For those who have actually to disassembled a ctg and post their findings I thank you.
    I've disassembled thousands with dates from single digits to recent IVI. And the thing is...this isn't worth arguing about any more. Some of you think these jacketed bullets are lubed...and that won't change. They aren't though.
    Regards, Jim

  16. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post:


  17. #29
    Legacy Member harry mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-11-2024 @ 04:08 PM
    Location
    Norfolk, UK
    Posts
    470
    Local Date
    04-20-2024
    Local Time
    01:05 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by bob q View Post
    All my Enfield's lock on rear right hand side of the receiver , just like a 71 Mauser . Yes I have cut the rear cocking lug off a bolt . It made no difference on firing , but it made working the bolt very hard . I guess Lee did know how his own design worked since he called it a cocking assist lug in his patent drawings . .303 was the lowest power ammo used by major militaries . The Britishicon military wanted to replace the Enfield with a Mauser because of the weak action . The British use replaceable bolt head of different lengths to keep rifles in service because the actions stretch and the bolt body compacts . That action movement is what causes the cases to want to separate at the head . All my original .303 bullets have a blue - green grease on them . None of my original WWI era Germanicon , Italianicon , Austrian ammo has Anything on the bullets . I do find it hard to believe you people do not know any of this , it is common knowledge , I am sorry to have upset you with it .
    I have previously pulled quite a lot of post WW2 ammo and never seen any grease on the bullets. All, however had the tar/pitch sealant. Just the other week I pulled a bullet from a much earlier round of .303 and not only did it have the pich sealant, but the canelure was full of a blue grease. The round was a mis-fire, and the propellant was cordite, the bullet was silver coloured rather than copper jacketed.

  18. Thank You to harry mac For This Useful Post:


  19. #30
    Contributing Member CINDERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last On
    04-15-2024 @ 01:08 PM
    Location
    South West Western Australia
    Posts
    7,749
    Real Name
    CINDERS
    Local Date
    04-20-2024
    Local Time
    09:05 AM
    Okay we flogged the bees wax/tar to death to me it was a manufacturing process and was changed whether the intent was to have lubed bullets is an argument that can go on for ages.
    What really concerns me is the removal of the said cocking assist lug from the bolt, ummm others may agree/disagree but the way I look at it that lug (The small one cut off by #15) is an integral part of the equal dispersion of the recoil forces applied to it upon firing (Helical lockup) which is why the contact with that lug is so important so the action is not overly stressed on one side. All of my Enfields lock up on the Rt rear side and the Left rear as well!
    Sorry to say but you would not be allowed to shoot that rifle on our range if it was noticed the lug had been removed (Illegal mod) even if you were a licensed gunsmith or trained armourer you would be asked to pack it up and be content with throwing gravel at the target.

    The Lee action in the early days of B.P loads perhaps may have been considered a low powered load but come the advent of cordite and the re-proofing requirements I would say the lee action is not low powered well put it this way if I balanced 42,000 lbs/sq inch on your nose you'd look very different.
    Nope we are all entitled to opinions whether right or wrong don't matter as long as you can admit your wrong and I have been wrong at times and duly corrected but to modify a bolt then shoot it well I say those who are armourers here would be shaking their heads I know I am. (Pic showing the Mauser/Enfield Bolts.)
    Last edited by CINDERS; 12-29-2017 at 12:43 AM.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. 2- groove vs 4-groove barrel
    By Calfed in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-03-2011, 09:18 AM
  2. OT but important to us... Harlan?
    By phil441 in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 09-14-2010, 03:18 PM
  3. Does this signify anything important?
    By Steve H. in N.Y. in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-24-2010, 10:28 PM
  4. 2 groove barrel and 180 grain bullets
    By jmm03 in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-22-2009, 12:18 AM
  5. Cast Bullets for 2 groove bbl #4MKI*
    By Frank46 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-04-2009, 11:17 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts