+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Enfield P14 marking question.

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    56

    Enfield P14 marking question.

    What's the signification of a daisy flower on the bolt of an Enfield P14 made by Remington, no asterisk on the receiver. I don't have any pics, sorry.

  2. #2
    The daisy stamp indicates the rifle recieved a Weedon refub prior to WWII. If only one part on the rifle has it then it's a replacement part not original to the rifle. - Bill

  3. #3
    Legacy Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    56
    Here are some pics of the rifle. I think the bolt has been renumbered probably long time ago.






  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by oldfoneguy View Post
    The daisy stamp indicates the rifle recieved a Weedon refub prior to WWII. If only one part on the rifle has it then it's a replacement part not original to the rifle. - Bill
    I was under the impression from different sources that these stars/asterisks on different parts (including the bolt handle) only indicate manufacture as Mk I* versions. If there is no similar mark on the receiver it might be that it's an early one that escaped upgrade? Can't quite make out the serial number on the photo.

    Ridolpho

  5. #5
    Legacy Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    56
    Serial number is 54188

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Buster95 View Post
    Serial number is 54188
    That's pretty early. The approval date for the change was Dec. 1916 but I don't know at what serial# it occured at the 3 factories. If you peruse old threads here there may be an answer. I assume that a Mk I* bolt would not work in an unmodified Mk I receiver.

    Ridolopho

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Ridolpho View Post
    That's pretty early. The approval date for the change was Dec. 1916 but I don't know at what serial# it occured at the 3 factories. If you peruse old threads here there may be an answer. I assume that a Mk I* bolt would not work in an unmodified Mk I receiver.

    Ridolopho
    Absolutely correct. Due to the longer lug length the barrel face had to be recessed to fit the MkI* spec bolt in a pre* spec receiver. There was no need to mark parts with the * marking once the change was accepted 12/16 as they were all made that way. The only reason for the marking was to let it be known that an earlier manufactured rifle was up to current spec. - BILL

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. 'Z' marking on GRI Lee-Enfield No.1 Mk.3
    By CDB18 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-06-2012, 07:50 PM
  2. L4 marking question
    By Longshaor in forum The Bren LMG (Light Machine Gun)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-20-2010, 05:11 PM
  3. PAL 10" Marking Question
    By SPEEDGUNNER in forum Edged Weapons Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-13-2010, 11:23 AM
  4. T38 marking question
    By Patrick Chadwick in forum Japanese Rifles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-22-2010, 08:35 PM
  5. Sling Well Marking Question
    By Tired Retired in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-11-2010, 10:54 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts