+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Parker Hale BSA ShtLe MKIII*

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member nijalninja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Last On
    10-09-2020 @ 07:24 PM
    Location
    Australia
    Age
    25
    Posts
    361
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    04:16 AM

    Parker Hale BSA ShtLe MKIII*

    I had the absolute pleasure of meeting a collector chap just the other day about this rifle, and with his permission I have some pictures as well as what I can tell about it. The pictures are not the best but show the important parts.

    First off I am very new to Parker Hale and the british target rifles in general, but this rifle seems like it got quite a workout.

    It is a 1917 BSA ShtLe MKIII* (Same year as my BSA and with very very distinctly similar looking wood furniture ) It looks that the metal has been almost entirely refinished, and then maintained. The nosecap is unnumbered and comes with a PH sight protector hood (Which has evidently been there and taken on and off a number of times by corresponding wearing of the ears where they have been slid on and off). The butt-stock has a blank marking disc and looks to have been scrubbed or steamed of all of its markings on the RHS, but it is most certainly a military butt as it has two repairs, top and bottom, of the rear shoulders of the butt-stock (Same as my 1917 BSA), but on the bottom of the butt-stock forward of the heel to the butt-socket are some inspector looking marks. It comes with a PH5 rear aperture sight with the 'SMLE' plate on the side, and with this is even a PH marked stamped steel protector that clips onto the charger guide and is held somewhat by the cocking piece (very cool). I took a peak into the mag-well and thought I could see what looked like some compound tucked up between the action and fore-end. It also came with a short wide sling (which the owner found to be an old Lewis gun sling altered to suit target shooting with the MKIII's. When slung from the mid-band and trigger guard it is a good length to tuck your arm into, that is if you are a tad shorter than a lanky fellow like me.). It also retains MKIII rear sights with windage adjustment (Different serial), and a 'HV' mark on the barrel rearward of it. No 'SC'.

    Now for the interesting things that had me curious: It has what looks to be a commercial BSA barrel that has been Ball Burnished and proofed. The muzzle is distinct from military barrels I have seen, and on the knox is a nice BSA crossed rifles stamp as well as minimal other marks but a serial and proof. Would it be normal for PH to replace the military barrel with a commercial one? As well as that are these two screws, one either side, of the trigger guard going up into the fore-end, which I can only guess go up and into relative threaded holes in the sear lugs to anchor the fore-end a bit more.

    Again, I know little about Parker Hale, but the owner of this rifle, and myself, would like to find out as much as we can about it, as it is very very nice.

    Attachment 96770Attachment 96771Attachment 96772Attachment 96773Attachment 96774Attachment 96775Attachment 96776Attachment 96777Attachment 96778Attachment 96779Attachment 96780Attachment 96781
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Contributing Member Gil Boyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Last On
    02-28-2024 @ 11:09 AM
    Location
    Home of The Parachute Regiment & 16 Air Assault Brigade
    Posts
    4,772
    Real Name
    Gil Boyd
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:16 PM
    Hi Nigel,

    Great piece there, and yes it was common to see what I call AGA barrels used in this way.
    Often they were a personal choice, but I did see a numerical seqence numbered rifles once, all of which had those barrels fitted, so they must have done that for a special role one thinks.

    The 5A PH MKVII sight always faired well on the SMLE and you can imagine with BSA just up the road, both companies often worked hand in glove to achieve the very best for the services! I have fired, very accurately an SMLE with the 5A fitted at Warminster many years ago, and I am sure Peter L might reflect if its still in their collection there, brillinat little sight.

    PH foresight covers and the good old "Flanders Flaps" were often constructed by PH during WW1, due primarily to the severity of trench warfare and the incessant mud they had to endure as front lines moved back and forth, but few records remain of the detail on their design, albeit, I did put a drawing up on here a few years ago which I can not find now, probably dropped off in the ether lol!

    Yes the two BA screws did exactly that, held the trigger guard in a firm position. They look like they have taken some beating with a blunt bladed screw driver over time.
    'Tonight my men and I have been through hell and back again, but the look on your faces when we let you out of the hall - we'd do it all again tomorrow.' Major Chris Keeble's words to Goose Green villagers on 29th May 1982 - 2 PARA

  4. Thank You to Gil Boyd For This Useful Post:


  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #3
    Legacy Member Strangely Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 10:06 AM
    Location
    Wiltshire UK
    Age
    72
    Posts
    551
    Real Name
    Mick Kelly
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:16 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Gil Boyd View Post
    The 5A PH MKVII sight always faired well on the SMLE and you can imagine with BSA just up the road, both companies often worked hand in glove to achieve the very best for the services! I have fired, very accurately an SMLE with the 5A fitted at Warminster many years ago, and I am sure Peter L might reflect if its still in their collection there, brillinat little sight.
    When the HBSA, (Historical Breechloading Small arms Association) put together a set of rules for shooting historic arms in 1995 they deemed the P-H5a so good, (against the earlier folding sight's) that in their competitions the SMLE fitted with a P-H5a shoots in the Veteran Class alongside No.4's instead of the Classic class for rifles designed before 1919.
    Mick

  7. Thank You to Strangely Brown For This Useful Post:


  8. #4
    Legacy Member nijalninja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Last On
    10-09-2020 @ 07:24 PM
    Location
    Australia
    Age
    25
    Posts
    361
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    04:16 AM
    Thread Starter
    Gil , thanks for confirming. Do you know exactly between what years PH used ball burnishing? It could help to pin down roughly when this rifle was made-up, or alternatively are there any records for the rifles they had their hands on at all? The 5A looks to be a very stout and robust kinda thing compared to the Centrals I have seen. This cover is actually only for the front sights and has no flap to cover the muzzle, unlike others I have seen albeit not PH made. Along with removing these screws is there likely to be any kind of stocking-up or bedding which would cause issues in disassembly or reassembly? I had it in mind to strip this rifle to have a look at what work was done under the surface but was unsure if there might be things in there that would need re-aligning and whatnot should it be taken apart.

  9. #5
    Contributing Member Gil Boyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Last On
    02-28-2024 @ 11:09 AM
    Location
    Home of The Parachute Regiment & 16 Air Assault Brigade
    Posts
    4,772
    Real Name
    Gil Boyd
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:16 PM
    Nigel,
    Dating the No1 you show I would place it somewhere in the 1914-18 era and a Mk111. Check for matching serial numbers of which there should be four:
    1. Reciever
    2. Bolt
    3. Under Foresight, under the leaf
    4. Nose cap (not in all cases but usual)
    Don't fret if serial numbers don't totally match or missing it just means its had a few necessary replacements fitted
    The two screws if taken out, in my view should be replaced with period screws that have been less chewed by the blunt bladed screw driver.
    By removing them you will cause no obvious seating issues, but whilst out measure them and trawl decent armourers or websites and get yourself two replacement ones and a couple of spares.
    I know Norman Clarks at Rugby will "definitely" have some to replace them for you, 19 Somers Rd, Rugby, CV22 7DG and has a great stock of PH stuff too.
    Phone: (0044) (0)1788 579651.
    I think if it was my rifle I would want to see what lay beneath and clean her up a bit with two new screws, and where the metal work could be accessed a nice TLC job where possible to keep her on the road for a lot more years yet!!.
    Last edited by Gil Boyd; 10-27-2018 at 10:44 AM.
    'Tonight my men and I have been through hell and back again, but the look on your faces when we let you out of the hall - we'd do it all again tomorrow.' Major Chris Keeble's words to Goose Green villagers on 29th May 1982 - 2 PARA

  10. Thank You to Gil Boyd For This Useful Post:


  11. #6
    Legacy Member Mk VII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    03-20-2024 @ 07:30 PM
    Location
    England
    Age
    62
    Posts
    1,406
    Real Name
    James West
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:16 PM
    In those days barrels were replaced more frequently as they sustained cordite wear - some people replaced them every season.

    The reamed out nosecap hole is typical of S.R. (b) rifles - not allowed for S.R.(a).

    I've also got a uncrowned barrel on my commercial BSA (not ball-burnished, though)



    The 1961 P-H catalogue commented :
    “ This is a barrel finishing process which we acquired in the year 1922, through the good offices of the late Mr. T. B. Simpson, a Bisley visitor from Australiaicon, where he represented a well-known Britishicon firm of pump manufacturers. Mr. Simpson brought over sectioned barrels, one of which had been burnished by passing through sized steel balls under pressure. The difference between the unprocessed barrel and the other was remarkable, especially at a time when riflemen were troubled by the presence of hard metallic fouling which in some instances seriously affected the accuracy of their barrels
    “ The sectioned barrels showed that the ball burnished barrel had a dark mirror-like perfectly smooth surface on the lands, whereas the other barrel, although well rifled, had innumerable cross-cuts on the lands which under the great pressure which the bullets exerts on the bore, scrapes off some of the metal jacket of the bullets until an excessively hard lump of metal forms which cuts into the passing bullets and destroys accuracy.
    “ Ball Burnishing closes up these cuts on the lands and although it does not touch the grooves it is rarely that any metallic fouling collects there as these grooves are cut longitudinally, i.e. in the same direction as the passage of the bullet, therefore, there are no cross cuts to scrape the bullet skin and, therefore, no hard fouling of any consequence.
    “ In a barrel that is worn, the edges of the lands become rounded, thus reducing the area of contact available to the ball in the burnishing process; it follows, therefore, that Ball Burnishing is most effective when applied to unworn barrels. For this reason it is to be recommended chiefly for application to new barrels, thereby improving their initial levelness and the homogeneity of the wearing surface of the lands giving an expectation of greater accuracy, longer life and less likelihood of collecting metallic fouling………
    “ Ball Burnishing enlarges the average bore by approximately one half thousandth part of an inch, an almost infinitesimal amount which in no circumstances can cause any detrimental effect.
    Many marksmen using Service rifles are misled into error in specifying precise bore sizes when placing orders for new barrels or new rifles. It is impracticable within the tolerances maintained under present day conditions [1961] to furnish barrels with bore sizes which were current before the second World War.
    “ New barrels today are officially acceptable when made between .301 and .304 gauge, but 98% of new barrel production is found to gauge between .301 and .3025……….”

  12. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Mk VII For This Useful Post:


  13. #7
    Legacy Member nijalninja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Last On
    10-09-2020 @ 07:24 PM
    Location
    Australia
    Age
    25
    Posts
    361
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    04:16 AM
    Thread Starter
    Hey Gil, yeah I can date the original rifle as 1917 on the butt-socket, but I was curious about when it might have been worked by PH. As someone interested in Enfield target rifles I would love to have an idea of when this rifle was taken from normal configuration to PH spec to compare with other target rifles I know of to see how things progressed, and the differences between a Brit made target rifle and an Australianicon one.

    The reciever and bolt match, but the nosecap is unnumbered, and the rear sights do not match (They have the windage adjustment). As for the screws the owner only shoots it sparingly and takes good care of it, so I think without having to take the gun apart every week the screws should be fine unless they are well and truly cranked in there and more damage will occur in pulling them out, but finding spares might be a good idea. If the seating and bedding will not be upset and there are no other issues I will, next time I see the owner, ask if I could strip it down and take a look and do some bits of maintenance should it need it. If the finish underneath is anything like it is on top it should be fine. Cheers mate.

  14. #8
    Contributing Member Gil Boyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Last On
    02-28-2024 @ 11:09 AM
    Location
    Home of The Parachute Regiment & 16 Air Assault Brigade
    Posts
    4,772
    Real Name
    Gil Boyd
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:16 PM
    None of the records I hold seem to cover WW1, but I hold stuff going back to 3 band rifles in the mid 1860's, but one would assume from thier operational practises at PH which have been fairly consistant over the years, that it would most highly probably have been worked on by Parker Hale as soon after manufacture, and it being identified that it shot straight and accurately consistantly thereafter, so from that 1917-18 would date it as so.
    'Tonight my men and I have been through hell and back again, but the look on your faces when we let you out of the hall - we'd do it all again tomorrow.' Major Chris Keeble's words to Goose Green villagers on 29th May 1982 - 2 PARA

  15. Thank You to Gil Boyd For This Useful Post:


  16. #9
    Legacy Member nijalninja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Last On
    10-09-2020 @ 07:24 PM
    Location
    Australia
    Age
    25
    Posts
    361
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    04:16 AM
    Thread Starter
    Oh really? I had no idea about their practices like this, but it would make sense to work a rifle before it was abused in service, especially a World War, but that does not, to me, explain the armourer's repairs in the butt-stock, but I suppose you would mos certainly make better deductions than me about this.

  17. #10
    Contributing Member Gil Boyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Last On
    02-28-2024 @ 11:09 AM
    Location
    Home of The Parachute Regiment & 16 Air Assault Brigade
    Posts
    4,772
    Real Name
    Gil Boyd
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:16 PM
    Nothing has really changed in 100 years. If a rifle is found to surpass standards, it would be singled out for a better life in the hands of a sniper. It would appear yours was clearly in the hands of someone who knew about rifles and making them better by using better sights available, that would be my assumption, and most likely after the war in a shooting team of sorts.
    The repairs are just what follows in an "active" service, knocks and bumps and bits need replacing as a matter of course IMHO, or simply changes that an owner made as he tried other bits and pieces out to improve his art!!.
    Last edited by Gil Boyd; 10-28-2018 at 05:47 PM.
    'Tonight my men and I have been through hell and back again, but the look on your faces when we let you out of the hall - we'd do it all again tomorrow.' Major Chris Keeble's words to Goose Green villagers on 29th May 1982 - 2 PARA

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. A.G. and A.J. Parker and Parker Hale site
    By Black Lab in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-27-2011, 08:35 PM
  2. Parker Hale T4
    By 8udr in forum Parker Hale Rifles Sub-Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-29-2010, 05:05 PM
  3. A.G. and A.J. Parker and Parker-Hale Service Rifle Target Sights
    By Badger in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-12-2010, 08:06 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks