+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 34

Thread: No. 4 Mk 1 (T) bolt mismatch - how much does it hurt value?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #11
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    03-20-2024 @ 06:05 AM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,429
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    02:58 PM
    I would agree with Paul. In fact the only 4T's I've noted where you get a perfect colour match (usually) between the cheekpiece, fore end, guards, & butt, is on Canadianicon T's, as all of the wood is invariably American black walnut, including the 'piece. In the UKicon, whilst most rifles were set up in walnut the wood was not generally used for cheekpieces, which are most commonly beech & less commonly ash & stained birch. Consequently, there will generally be at least a slight variation in colour, & sometimes a quite noticeable variation.

    I also thought the bolt handle has been lengthened & fitted with an over size bolt knob. Ironically, it looks to have been quite nicely done. Shame, but not the end of the world, particularly if reflected in the price. The original bolt handle knob would have had a hole counter bored in it, typical of BSA throughout their No4 production history.

    Added later: I forgot to mention earlier but if the rifle body lacks the side wall 'T' it may well be a 'scopeless T' as bigwagon suggests.
    Last edited by Roger Payne; 12-21-2018 at 11:13 AM. Reason: addendum

  2. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:


  3. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  4. #12
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    03-24-2024 @ 09:52 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,507
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    04:58 PM
    In the real world of Armourers, fitting new or second-hand/used bolts, woodwork and other odds and ends was an everyday occurrence. If the bolt wasn't mated exactly to the rifle, we'd work our magic until it was, then carry out all of the usual associated tests, CHS, squareness etc etc, lift and so on. Then range test it for accuracy when it was assembled and then re-number the bolt to match the rifle. Done hundreds of 'em......, week in and week out. Sadly, when we were using and repairing them the words safe queens or investments didn't come into it. And concourse was reserved for fancy cars.

    Sorry, but that just how it was..........., just another killing machine.

  5. The Following 8 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  6. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  7. #13
    Legacy Member Bigwagon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Last On
    03-21-2024 @ 10:22 PM
    Location
    WI
    Posts
    40
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    09:58 AM
    Thread Starter
    I was able to make a closer inspection of this rifle today and get better photos. I think the rifle may be a late-war converted scopeless No. 4 (T) based on the lack of "T" mark on the receiver or a scope number on the wrist. The No. 32 Mk III scope and bracket match the numbers on the scope can, but not the rifle, and there are no serial number markings on the transit case. As previously noted the bolt is altered and mis-matched. Overall it's a very nice package, but my guess is possibly pieced together. Other than the bolt issue, the rifle is in beautiful condition and the package is very tempting.

    Here's an album of more detailed shots.

    Imgur: The magic of the Internet

  8. #14
    Contributing Member Seaforth72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 03:30 AM
    Location
    Richmond, British Columbia, CANADA
    Posts
    366
    Real Name
    Colin MacGregor Stevens, CD
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    07:58 AM
    There is not nearly enough information to form a proper conclusion.

    A mismatched bolt on a Lee-Enfield is a VERY SERIOUS problem form a collector's point of view and would break most possible sales deals, both now and in the future. The chance of finding the original bolt is EXTREMELY slim. Milsurps.com has a thread set up by ~Angel~'s "Match Making" Service for "rifles looking for bolts." https://www.milsurps.com/showthread.php?t=1035 A mismatched Lee-Enfield bolt will ALWAYS hurt a deal. If selling the rifle to a re-enactor or shooter, it might not matter as much, but even they would not want to pay a top dollar.

    The lack of a scope serial number on the butt just below the cocking piece, tells me that this is ALMOST CERTAINLY a No. 4 Mk. I (T. LESS TELESCOPE) which was NOT a sniper rifle as it was an unfinished conversion in that it never had a telescope and bracket fitted in service. Such a rifle would usually have "TR", "S" and "S51" markings. If that is the case there should be no "T" on the left side, no scope number on the butt (as noted) and the rifle serial number on the bracket would be for a different rifle.

    We do not know all the reasons why there were so many No. 4 Mk. I (T. LESS TELESCOPE) rifles made. Many of these were early Stevens-Savage production and some were late-war BSA Shirley production. The late-war examples are understandable, for the contract ended on a specific date, so regardless of how many rifles were partway through the conversion process, it was a case of "down tools" at the appointed hour. (Info from Peter Laidlericon as I recall).

    I disagree, most respectfully, with "breakeyp" in that I have never seen any indication that the cheek rests were only fitted after issue to snipers. The one exception is that the very first No. 4 Mk. I (T) rifles were reportedly issued without cheek rests, but these were fitted as soon as they became available.

    For American Garand collectors, they can identify with this unfinished sniper conversion situation by thinking of the "SA-52" marked M1icon rifles. Drilled for the M1C scope base, 4,796 unfinished M1C receivers had the special scope mount holes plugged and the rifles were issued in the Korean War as standard M1 rifles, marked SA-52. As a result, they are not and were not, technically snipers as the conversion was never completed. [Ref: The M1 Garand Rifle - Bruce N. Canfield p. 526]
    Colin MacGregor Stevens https://www.captainstevens.com [B]Model 1918 scope ideally w P14 rings; LB Scout Sniper Rifle windmill sight & furniture; No. 4 Mk. I* 28L0844; any rifle with S/N ASE-xxxx ; No.32 Mk. I SN 1042.

  9. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Seaforth72 For This Useful Post:


  10. #15
    Legacy Member limpetmine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    03-25-2024 @ 02:31 PM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    979
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    09:58 AM
    I concur. As a buyer and collector, a bolt mismatch on a (T) gives me serious pause. SERIOUS pause. It would have to be a really good bargain, as you'd never get market price for it. Always discounted.

  11. #16
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    03-20-2024 @ 06:05 AM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,429
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    02:58 PM
    Yes, worth rather less than a matching bolt rig to a collector, but I always let the price make the ultimate decision for me. The scope & bracket alone (assuming they are in good functional & cosmetic condition) are worth somewhere between two & two & a half thousand pounds on the UKicon market. I suppose it depends on if you want a one-off purchase as the example of a 4T for your collection, or whether you want to shoot it, re-enact, or (heaven forbid), move it on again & earn something out of it. I'd have no qualms about splitting it up to sell on, as it's a non-matching set. A correct pattern bolt body could be fitted as a replacement - it'll never be 'factory original', but a much better prospect than what's in the rifle at the moment.

  12. Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:


  13. #17
    Legacy Member Bigwagon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Last On
    03-21-2024 @ 10:22 PM
    Location
    WI
    Posts
    40
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    09:58 AM
    Thread Starter
    I agree on the bolt mismatch being a serious hit to value and desirability, as well as it likely being a "T less scope" in the first place. But the accessories are of great interest to me for my early Savage No. 4 (T). I think I can get the package for about $3500-3800, at which point I probably would replace bolt, sell the rifle, and keep the scope and transit case for my other rifle. The scope has clear glass and appears in overall good condition, but the elevation and windage knobs are very stiff so it probably needs some attention.

  14. Thank You to Bigwagon For This Useful Post:


  15. #18
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Today @ 10:56 AM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,526
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    02:58 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Seaforth72 View Post
    The lack of a scope serial number on the butt just below the cocking piece, tells me that this is ALMOST CERTAINLY a No. 4 Mk. I (T. LESS TELESCOPE) which was NOT a sniper rifle as it was an unfinished conversion in that it never had a telescope and bracket fitted in service.
    Just another thought.

    My No4T has been vetted and 'authenticated' by Peter Laidlericon and it does not have the Scope serial number on the Butt - apparently this was common with RAF No4Ts, the butts were replaced by the armourers to 'fit' the Sniper to whom the rifle was issued.

    Mine is a fully authenticated RAF No4T and has all of the relevant markings used by the RAF armourers.


    Example :


    34 BWC 8-68


    Means it was "overhauled at 34th base Workshops at Catterick August 1968"
    Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...

  16. Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:


  17. #19
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    4,651
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    07:58 AM
    Probably what happened was the fellow who made up the oversized bolt knob, or had it made up, was wise enough to set the original bolt aside and modify another.

    How well he or his gunsmith got the lugs to bear on each other is anyone's guess, but quite possibly nothing was done. Lapping them in would have also changed the recoil shoulders in the receiver/body and if the owner was wise enough, he may not have wanted to do that.

    So, the original bolt is probably out there somewhere, perhaps even still in his basement or garage: if the owner passed on and his family got rid of his guns, they may or may not have dealt with the bits and pieces yet.

    You need to find out who the owner was and talk to him, or his family ASAP.

    Stop press: just had another look at the photos and this might well be the original bolt judging by the taper put on the handle, which could be enough to completely erase the original numbers.

    Have a good look at the wear patterns on the bolt and check the bearing of the lugs with layout blue. Should be possible to tell if this is the original from that.

    Regardless if it is original, if it is a good fit with proper contact on the lugs, you might as well get an appropriate bolt and use the handle and knob to restore this one. There should be enough "meat" left to splice the two together as far away from the bolt body as possible.
    Last edited by Surpmil; 01-05-2019 at 12:49 PM.
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

  18. #20
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    03-24-2024 @ 09:52 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,507
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    04:58 PM
    Obviously, to someone like me and the hundreds of other real Armourers who have fitted hundreds of new or part used/worn bolts to hundreds of rifles it's a bit of a kick in the crutch to know that a new bolt makes a rifle worth less. Being a big grown up lad who's been there, been round the block and done it a few times it's not that I care tooooo much. But surely if it's properly done, gauged and all the tests done and then range tested, out inspected by the ogre of an out inspector then, surely, what's the problem? Am I less skilled that the fitter at Maltby or BSA? Not as skilled or experienced as the.......... Anyway...........

  19. Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:

    cml

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Schofield mismatch
    By hsr in forum Other Military Service Pistols and Revolvers
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-10-2013, 12:22 PM
  2. P14 mismatch bolt - question.
    By newcastle in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-20-2011, 11:24 AM
  3. New old No4 MK1 TR owner with mismatch question
    By RobsTV in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-17-2011, 05:36 PM
  4. That hurt !!!
    By painter777 in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 09-11-2010, 08:39 PM
  5. Mismatch No4 T scope question
    By Baal in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-08-2010, 03:58 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks