+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Emergency Use "EY" Markings on P-14

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member Tom Jackson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    07-30-2020 @ 02:02 PM
    Posts
    91
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:09 PM

    Emergency Use "EY" Markings on P-14

    I recently purchased a decent Eddystone P-14 that is all matching and in very good overall condition - appears un-fired. The butt and left side of the receiver are stamped with "EY" (Emergency Use) markings. What was the criteria for "EY" markings?
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Contributing Member CINDERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last On
    03-25-2024 @ 11:01 AM
    Location
    South West Western Australia
    Posts
    7,734
    Real Name
    CINDERS
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    07:09 AM
    Those with the information you require will come along shortly but my thinking onthe matter is a weapon which is considered not good enough for front line service.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Legacy Member Tom Jackson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    07-30-2020 @ 02:02 PM
    Posts
    91
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:09 PM
    Thread Starter
    I understand that. The question is WHY was it designated suitable for emergency use only other than the fact that P-14s were not regular issue rifles? However, since P-14 rifles also had problems with non-interchangeable parts and bolt modifications I wonder if the FY marking indicates there is some other reason that it was only suitable for emergency use. For example is the rifle considered safe to shoot? don't know how common the FY marking is on P-14 rifles. Frankly I have not paid much attention to P-14s that are not in sniper configuration. This rifle was purchased a part of a two-gun lot with an SMLE that I wanted. However, the P-14 turned out to be a very original rifle in extremely good condition. I can't find much on the FY marking in Skennertonicon's books.

  6. #4
    Legacy Member oldfoneguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Last On
    Today @ 05:19 PM
    Location
    long island, ny
    Posts
    561
    Real Name
    Bill
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:09 PM
    Is it a low serial number? The very early rifles from all 3 manufacturers were considered unfit for front line troops due to the part incompatibility situation.

  7. #5
    Legacy Member RC20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Last On
    02-07-2022 @ 09:20 PM
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    316
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    02:09 PM
    What mfg?

  8. #6
    Contributing Member fjruple's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last On
    10-29-2023 @ 04:38 AM
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    1,021
    Real Name
    Franklin Ruple
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    07:09 PM
    I have to look for the reference but I believe the EY designation was used on the early Pattern 1914 MKI due to the feeding problems with the early rifles. The MKI* modification to the bolt and barrel corrected the feeding problem. You probably guessed that a rifle with feeding issues is not a rifle for front line service but can be used for other duties to free up No. 1 MKIII for the front line service. I don't believe parts compatibility was ever achieved with the six major variations and other sub-variations of the Pattern 1914. All Pattern 1914 required hand fitting of parts to the rifles.

  9. Thank You to fjruple For This Useful Post:


  10. #7
    Legacy Member Tom Jackson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    07-30-2020 @ 02:02 PM
    Posts
    91
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:09 PM
    Thread Starter
    I suspect you are right. My rifle is an Eddystone, no. 401970. That is not an early production rifle but it does lack the * markings on the receiver, bolt and stock.

  11. #8
    Legacy Member MGMike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last On
    03-05-2024 @ 06:06 PM
    Posts
    153
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:09 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Jackson View Post
    ... The question is WHY was it designated suitable for emergency use only other than the fact that P-14s were not regular issue rifles? However, since P-14 rifles also had problems with non-interchangeable parts and bolt modifications I wonder if the FY marking indicates there is some other reason that it was only suitable for emergency use. For example is the rifle considered safe to shoot? ...
    This is a good question. Complete parts interchangeability was never achieved between P'14 rifles of different makes, which complicated front-line maintenance. This is a serious concern because weapons in combat suffer extraordinary abuse and constantly need service. When the U.S. adopted its .30 caliber version as the M1917, the Ordnance Corps believed that interchangeability was important enough that production should be delayed until at least substantial interchangeability was attained. The Britishicon, however, had a less leisurely attitude; they had heavy combat losses to make up, and gave overwhelming priority to getting rifles into the hands of their troops. However, even they had limits: lack of interchangeability was really serious in the case of P'14 Mark 1 vs. Mark 1* rifles. The bolt of the Mark 1 rifle not only was not interchangeable with the Mk1*, but its functioning was believed unsatisfactory. In order to retrofit a Mark1* bolt, the barrels of Mark 1 rifles would have to be taken out and remachined. This was not deemed feasible in wartime, so existing Mark 1 rifles were simply relegated to second-line service; i.e., not overseas at the front. This is why some rifles in almost new condition were stamped "EY". In this instance, the designation "emergency" is perhaps a bit of hyperbole; the guns are perfectly safe to shoot.

    Apparently a large quantity of Mk.1 rifles were produced before the Mark 1* change; I have examined Eddystone Mk 1 bolts with s/ns as high as the 192,000 range. Mark 1* bolts, which have a slightly longer feed guide lip on the left locking lug, are readily distinguished by a "*" stamped on the bolt root.

    I have an early Eddystone P'14 Mk 1 that feeds and functions very nicely, leading me to believe that some of the complaints, at least, may have been attributable to the loose tolerances of wartime British ammunition, as well as the abysmally adverse conditions of trench warfare.

    M
    Last edited by MGMike; 01-21-2019 at 11:08 AM.

  12. The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to MGMike For This Useful Post:


  13. #9
    Legacy Member RC20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Last On
    02-07-2022 @ 09:20 PM
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    316
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    02:09 PM
    Good post Mike.

    As for parts interchange. The US would have been better off to run them as were while working up to it. No troops were in combat initially and they desperately needed training rifles.

    AN * (or some such) could have been a hold indicator and the combat ones without it.

    The Brits did not use it much in combat from what I can gather so a non critical issue for them though likely annoying to the armorers. AT least they had rifles to train with and not broom sticks or cutout slabs of wood.

  14. #10
    Legacy Member harry mac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-11-2024 @ 04:08 PM
    Location
    Norfolk, UK
    Posts
    470
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    11:09 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Jackson View Post
    I suspect you are right. My rifle is an Eddystone, no. 401970. That is not an early production rifle but it does lack the * markings on the receiver, bolt and stock.
    Is the body of the rifle a Mk1, or a Mk1*?

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. The "emergency" 1940-41
    By RT Ellis in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Picture of the Day Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-23-2013, 12:05 PM
  2. Additional "S" markings on a "T" ?
    By ickmann in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-11-2010, 02:46 PM
  3. SAVAGE "S" in details, "ILCO butt trap", "P" on bayonet stud,what co. was ILCO?
    By Garandrew in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-15-2010, 07:48 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks