+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: Questions about rifle action and general strength of k98

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member Fruler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Last On
    08-23-2023 @ 01:03 AM
    Location
    Missouri, north America.
    Posts
    92
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    11:24 AM

    Questions about rifle action and general strength of k98

    I'm looking to buy a German, Mauser k98k... 7,92... The gun I'm looking at is 1945 dated. Stock is dry, looks like it could've been refinished and left without any oil to protect the wood, or perhaps my assumption could be far off. The seller has described it to me a "last ditch" rifle... The gun doesn't even have a hole near the front cap to insert a cleaning rod, which I found odd. I'm not sure how I feel about owning a last ditch gun, but it's in the price range for me and maybe you guys could talk some sense into me... So I've come here hoping to get some questions answered from the finest milsurp forum there is. Question 1. Was action strength ever compromised in anyway for these late war rifles? Question 2. Is the metallurgy or properties of the steel in the late war rifles just as good as 1940 dated K98ks? Was there any compromise in metal strength, I should say. That's basically all I want to know. I'm sure even when Nazi Germanyicon was scrambling to get every gun they could and trying to get them out the factories STAT, they still probably had high standards, right? At least I would assume so. Or did standard relax a bit??? Thanks a lot mates.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Legacy Member Calif-Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    10-01-2023 @ 12:52 AM
    Posts
    2,508
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:24 AM

    1945 Kar98k

    You are right in wondering about 1945 production. Most of the very late 98's are/have collector interest. I would not be looking for a 1945 shooter. Personally, I would be looking at a pre-war 98, for shooting and collecting. Guys, jump in on this question.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Legacy Member Fruler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Last On
    08-23-2023 @ 01:03 AM
    Location
    Missouri, north America.
    Posts
    92
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    11:24 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Calif-Steve View Post
    You are right in wondering about 1945 production. Most of the very late 98's are/have collector interest. I would not be looking for a 1945 shooter. Personally, I would be looking at a pre-war 98, for shooting and collecting. Guys, jump in on this question.
    Why would you not consider looking at a 1945 for a shooter? Is it more collectable? I figured the way this things looks it would be less desirable. I looked at it on the 30th and the action seems just as strong as any other mauser... Of course so do low serial numbered 1903s. I just want to be sure the gun is structurally intact and that the heat treating was done right... But impossible to know just by sight i suppose. Yes im actually thinking about finding a 1939-1942 model. Guns cranked out as fast as they can be, makes me nervous. Perhaps my nervousness is unfounded. Its always a gamble with and milsurp to an extent if you want a shooter.
    I own a bunch of milsurp but a few of my favorites are my Lithgow smle 1942, Argentine 1909 engineer Mauser carbine and my newest favorite, my Swiss K11... It's a special rifle with a troop tag and the most accurate I own.

  6. #4
    Legacy Member Paul S.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-08-2020 @ 06:58 PM
    Location
    Back and forth between Sydney and Southern California
    Posts
    1,594
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:24 AM
    My guess is that Calif-Steve bases his opinion upon the belief/myth/hype that any late war Germanicon weapons were subject to sabotage or poor workmanship at the hands of slave labourers, or that late war production was 'rushed' or not of the highest quality materials. That said, I personally have never, ever seen a Kar98 of any vintage have a structural failure. Would I shoot a 1945 Kar98? Yes, after checking it - just as I would any vintage firearm.

  7. #5
    Legacy Member pocketshaver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Last On
    09-23-2020 @ 04:17 AM
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    229
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:24 AM
    remember, a lot of the late war made by jewish prisoner rifles for the german military were used by isreal.... no issues for them.

    At the same time, there is a really nice book somewhere abouts that tells ANY company that does heat treating of metal including guns how to take the heat treatment out and then RE HEAT TREAT it to make it completely back to model 98 standards

  8. #6
    Legacy Member Eaglelord17's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Last On
    Today @ 08:26 AM
    Location
    Sault Ste. Marie, ON
    Posts
    1,257
    Real Name
    A.N.
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    11:24 AM
    Late war K98ks are perfectly safe to shoot provided no one has done anything to it afterwards and it is in good condition.

    The Germans cut corners on the stuff which didn't matter like overall fit and finish and simplifying the design as much as possible. They did not make unsafe rifles. Much like Japaneseicon late war, or Russianicon wartime production its crude but still effective.

  9. #7
    Legacy Member MGMike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last On
    03-05-2024 @ 06:06 PM
    Posts
    153
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:24 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Eaglelord17 View Post
    ...

    The Germans cut corners on the stuff which didn't matter like overall fit and finish and simplifying the design as much as possible. They did not make unsafe rifles. ...
    The potential problems are from things you can't see, cannot simply assume, and will not discover until there is a failure: poor raw material, and ersatz or improper or substandard heat treatment.

    It is an inescapable fact that by 1945 the Germans were desperate, and resorting to materials and methods that would not have been acceptable given more time and resources. Quality was subordinated to maintaining high production. What is surprising is that quality generally remained as high as it did. Yet, inevitably, under such circumstances there must have been many lapses.

    So --when you have a choice--do you want to trust your face to generalizations? If you're going to build a sporter, it's more sensible, with less risk, to start out with something unquestionably better.

    M

  10. #8
    Legacy Member amadeus76's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Last On
    01-11-2024 @ 06:51 PM
    Location
    Harker Heights, tx
    Posts
    305
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:24 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by MGMike View Post
    The potential problems are from things you can't see, cannot simply assume, and will not discover until there is a failure: poor raw material, and ersatz or improper or substandard heat treatment.

    It is an inescapable fact that by 1945 the Germans were desperate, and resorting to materials and methods that would not have been acceptable given more time and resources. Quality was subordinated to maintaining high production. What is surprising is that quality generally remained as high as it did. Yet, inevitably, under such circumstances there must have been many lapses.

    So --when you have a choice--do you want to trust your face to generalizations? If you're going to build a sporter, it's more sensible, with less risk, to start out with something unquestionably better.

    M
    When the war is going badly and you're desperate you definitely want to cut corners and issue your troops unsafe rifles... Cuz that makes sense.

    I have a 1945 mix-master K98icon shooter. It's a lot of things; accurate, reliable, fun. But the one thing it isn't is unsafe and poor quality.

  11. #9
    Contributing Member Aragorn243's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 08:31 AM
    Location
    Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    6,974
    Real Name
    Steve
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    11:24 AM
    Not a matter of issuing troops unsafe rifles. It is a matter of cutting corners, speeding things up and utilizing less resources or other resources because the correct ones are no longer available. Quality in these instances do indeed suffer. Germanyicon did have what is considered a last ditch rifle that most consider a collector piece not suitable for firing. These are extremely rare and the rifle in question here probably is not one.

  12. #10
    Legacy Member amadeus76's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Last On
    01-11-2024 @ 06:51 PM
    Location
    Harker Heights, tx
    Posts
    305
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:24 AM
    They cut corners on the stock, cleaning rod, and finish, not on the strength of the action... Doing so would be the most counter productive thing they could have done.

    You always hear about this crap, but I’ve yet to see any documented proof that any of the last ditch rifles from either Germanyicon or Japanicon were unsafe fire or that the actions were significantly less strong than pre-war examples.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. MKIII* Lithgow General Questions
    By nijalninja in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 01-10-2018, 10:16 PM
  2. P1864 Nepal Snider action strength
    By Ksearles62 in forum Black Powder
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-02-2016, 01:37 AM
  3. Ishapore 2A1 - General Questions (Help) Required
    By DRAGON64 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-12-2014, 09:35 AM
  4. Some general WW II 1911A1 questions...
    By imarangemaster in forum 1911/1911A1 Service Pistol
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-20-2013, 09:38 PM
  5. Strength Of Lee Enfield Action
    By ROCK in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 04-27-2012, 01:19 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks