+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: 1942 Long Branch No 4 mk 1*/3 barrel ID

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    jstr303's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Last On
    10-15-2019 @ 09:53 PM
    Location
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Posts
    17
    Real Name
    Joe
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:22 AM

    1942 Long Branch No 4 mk 1*/3 barrel ID

    I'm new here and this is my first post. I hope the pics attach ok.

    I have a newly aquired 1942 Long Branch No.4 Mk1*/3. I'm trying to ID the barrel on it. I had assumed it was re-barreled during the upgrade, but there is no date on the barrel, and the rifle has no FTR marks. The proof marks on the barrel look as though the barrel was made in the UKicon and not Canadaicon (as it should be because of the upgrade), and in 2 places it has the letter "I" stamped. The rifle looks like it has never been fired since the upgrade. The barrel has 5 lands/grooves, looks shiney and crisp with excelant depth. The feed ramp is still painted from the rifle refinish process with no scratches from cartridge feeding. The bolt head is a "0" whose face looks blued with no evidence of firing. The bolt body also looks new. The crown is great with the new finish from the upgrade still undisturbed. With no FTR marks and no date on the barrel, it's difficult to figure out what year it went through upgrade to Mk 2 specs.

    By the way, I've looked around the internet and have not yet found a pic of a receiver like mine with a nice anvil stamped /3. If anyone has one or knows where one is I'd like to see it.

    Attachment 103260Attachment 103261Attachment 103262Attachment 103263Attachment 103264Attachment 103265Attachment 103266Attachment 103267
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Legacy Member limpetmine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    03-25-2024 @ 02:31 PM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    979
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    09:22 AM
    The /3 is the FTR marking.
    Odd that there is no '54 or such date on the barrel. Nice rifle. Please PM me the serial # so I can include it in the data base. (Let me know when you're ready to move it)!!!!

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    jstr303's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Last On
    10-15-2019 @ 09:53 PM
    Location
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Posts
    17
    Real Name
    Joe
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:22 AM
    Thread Starter
    Yes, I know it was test fired after upgrade. I ment that it it appears not to have been fired as an issued rifle. I fitted a new bolt assembly on an older No4 Mk1 action, and after 20 rounds of test firing, that bolt face also looked unused.

  6. #4
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    jstr303's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Last On
    10-15-2019 @ 09:53 PM
    Location
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Posts
    17
    Real Name
    Joe
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:22 AM
    Thread Starter
    If you notice, the crossed flags proof mark has no crown or letters included. Its just crossed flags. One of the inspection marks includes a crown, a Z1 or 21, and the letter E on it's side. I assume that the E is for Enfield, the Z1/21 is the inspector ID, and the version of the crown image consistant with inspection marks from Great Briton.

    On the subject of the FTR mark, during my intial search for pictures of /3 versions, the examples I found show a date like 49 and the letters FTR. I admit that I've only been searching for a few days, but i was hoping someone here has exaples of the "/3" mark being the only mark.
    Last edited by jstr303; 10-11-2019 at 02:33 PM.

  7. #5
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    jstr303's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Last On
    10-15-2019 @ 09:53 PM
    Location
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Posts
    17
    Real Name
    Joe
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:22 AM
    Thread Starter
    With out a date on the barrel, and a marked FTR date, it's difficult to figure out when it was upgraded. The barrel looks like what Stratton's book referred to as a "First Variation" barrel, which he states would have been available on Britishicon made Mk 1s and found on some Fazakerly and P.O.F. No 4 Mk 2s. So I assume that type of barrel was available for the 49 thru early 50s Mk 2 upgrades.

  8. #6
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    03-24-2024 @ 09:52 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,507
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:22 PM
    I don't recall seeing a Mk1/2 opr 1/3 rifle that has hasn't been marked with the FTR marking. How do you know that it is in fact a Mk1/3 and not a Mk1/1 with a Mk2 fore-end?

  9. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    jstr303's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Last On
    10-15-2019 @ 09:53 PM
    Location
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Posts
    17
    Real Name
    Joe
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:22 AM
    Thread Starter
    If you look at one of the pictures at the begining of this thread you can see the cut for simplified bolt removal as all No 4 Mk 1* rifles have. One picture shows the markings on the left side of the receiver. It's stamped No 4 Mk 1*/3, Long Branch, 1942. When I took her apart, you can see the block that was added for the new trigger location. You can tell it's a modification, nicely done, but not a Mk II receiver.

  10. #8
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    jstr303's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Last On
    10-15-2019 @ 09:53 PM
    Location
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Posts
    17
    Real Name
    Joe
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:22 AM
    Thread Starter
    Here are some pictures of the /3 modification. These were taken the other day when I took her apart for quick acceptance inspection. I had only a few days to accept the rifle or return it and get a refund. I happily accepted the rifle. Soon I will take her apart for proper cleaning and lube. You can see by the pictures that there is a light dusting on the sear. The picture makes it look like surface rust, but at the time with the naked eye, I didn't see any rust.

  11. #9
    Legacy Member limpetmine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    03-25-2024 @ 02:31 PM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    979
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    09:22 AM
    An FTR is "factory through repair". It is a repair. Not an "upgrade". As in "upgrade in mark", which is what the /3 is. It is the upgrade to the hung trigger from the receiver, as your pictures show. An FTR is parts replacement/wood, but not a change of mark.
    FTR's have (usually) the year stamped on it, change of marks don't always have the year.
    But some do. Here is an example of this.


    Quote Originally Posted by jstr303 View Post
    If you notice, the crossed flags proof mark has no crown or letters included. Its just crossed flags. One of the inspection marks includes a crown, a Z1 or 21, and the letter E on it's side. I assume that the E is for Enfield, the Z1/21 is the inspector ID, and the version of the crown image consistant with inspection marks from Great Briton.

    On the subject of the FTR mark, during my intial search for pictures of /3 versions, the examples I found show a date like 49 and the letters FTR. I admit that I've only been searching for a few days, but i was hoping someone here has exaples of the "/3" mark being the only mark.


    So the question here is, did the FTR happen after the /3 conversion, or part of the conversion process?
    Last edited by limpetmine; 10-11-2019 at 04:32 PM.

  12. #10
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    jstr303's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    Last On
    10-15-2019 @ 09:53 PM
    Location
    Indianapolis, Indiana
    Posts
    17
    Real Name
    Joe
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:22 AM
    Thread Starter
    Myself, I would have not referred to it as an FTR, but then I have very little experience with the Enfields. Many others on this forum and other forums I've read keep wanting to refer to the upgrade to Mk 2 specs as an FTR. I've read a few books and checked out websites or blogs over the past year that indicate that rifles in for the upgrade were treated the same as if they were in for FTR. They say rifles would would come in by the crates in all sorts of condition from rusted/muddied/bloodied to top of the line. They indicate that rifles were still stripped down to barreled receivers.

    Parts went one way and the barreld receivers went to the proper technicians to be examined. If they were determined to have at least 80% life left, they kept their original barrels and went on for cleaning, prep, upgrade, refinished. From that point they were rebuilt with refinished or new parts, restocked, tested then processed for final distribution to where ever. Is this true? I have no idea.

    We all like to think that rifles in fantastic shape were sent in specifically for upgrade. To imagine that they were treated differently. We want to believe that they got most of their original parts back, restocked, tested, then sent back home to their units. Is this true? I have no idea.

    The receiver of my new rifle looks too good to be true. There looks to be very few anomalies or artifacts lurking under the refinish job. I'd like to believe that this was an original unissued rifle that was sent in for just an upgrade (that it really didn't need.) Then it ended up not being issued again. It's fun to dream and fantisize, but the reality will be quite different. It's a service rifle that was upgraded and refinished. I didn't look for, or pay for, something that was suppose to be unique. I just wanted a factory serviced and refinshed shooter with an excellent barrel.

    Once I learn more about this rifle, I'll start a new thread to show it and to report on the possible history that everyone can chime in on. Right now I need everyone to chime in on their opinions and facts on what really happend on this rifle's upgrade. Did she get to keep her oringinal barrel? or who made her replacement barrel? In fact who knows how many barrels she had had over the years or how many times she has been refinished.

    Let the chimming continue. Please continue with the facts, photos, and opinions. Help me figure out this barrel.
    Last edited by jstr303; 10-11-2019 at 07:07 PM.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Value of 1942 Long Branch No4 Mk1*
    By sport10990 in forum Appraisals, Fakery, Dispute Resolution & Mediation Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-07-2017, 04:39 AM
  2. 1942 Long branch barrel.
    By CAW in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-13-2015, 04:57 AM
  3. 1942 Long Branch No.4 MK I*
    By Sunnyblueskies in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-20-2012, 04:17 PM
  4. 1942 Long Branch No4 Mk1- barrel marking
    By chamber rat in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-07-2012, 11:55 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks