+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Lee enfield No.4 Mk I with Mk3 sight

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #11
    Legacy Member MilsurpMM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Last On
    01-21-2021 @ 05:40 PM
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    68
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:24 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Roger Payneicon View Post
    I am not absolutely certain, but I am pretty certain that the fabricated rear sights were designed, produced, & fitted during WW2. They were a cheaper & not so nice alternative to the Mk1 'Singer' sight, but a rather better proposition than the crude Mk2 'battle' sight. I daresay that all the information is quoted chapter & verse in the LES.

    If the rifle is really unadulterated & not FTR'ed & it bears a rear sight marked up to BSA then there is a good chance that it is a rifle produced by BSA at their Shirley factory near Birmingham, UK. The regional factory codes were applied to parts for some years after the end of the war by some manufacturers, BSA included. I've seen woodwork marked M47/C & dated in the mid-1950's. The secret factory codes were allocated sequentially, & began with either a 'S', a 'M' or a 'N', for Southern area (Southern part of Englandicon), the Midlands (which allso included Wales IIRC), or the North of England & Scotland. So, BSA, being based in the Birmingham area of the Midlands of England, was given a 'M' prefix, & just happened to be manufacturer number 47 in the Midlands area. The addition of the 'A', 'B', 'C', or 'D' simply indicated which of the four BSA facilities made the weapon/component. When the codes were adopted by BSA in 1943, at least initially, the last letter was not applied, so seeing rifles & components just marked 'M47' is quite common.

    Hope this helps a little.

    As ever, if the OP can get us a few photo's of the rifle in question he will no doubt get plenty of helpful advice - unless the rifle body has been linished, the manufacturer's name or code is likely to be on it somewhere, along with the year of manufacture.
    Very cool. Thank you very much for all the info!

  2. Thank You to MilsurpMM For This Useful Post:


  3. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  4. #12
    Contributing Member 30Three's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Last On
    03-19-2024 @ 03:50 PM
    Location
    France
    Posts
    809
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:24 PM
    The Mark 3 sight has the slide with a sprung lever to adjust on the RH side. My 1944 Maltby has one as original fit. They were cheaper to produce than the Mk1 screw type.
    Adjustment is not as fine as the screw type; so if target shooting, try and find a mk1 type and keep the original in your spares tin.

  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #13
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Today @ 12:25 PM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,526
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    09:24 PM
    The various types :
    Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...

  7. Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:


  8. #14
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 01:16 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,838
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    02:24 PM
    What Peter told us was that during wartime they would put on the Mk 2 for expedience. After the war when an armorer came to it he would change them for the Mk1 again.
    Regards, Jim

  9. #15
    Advisory Panel Brian Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 02:10 PM
    Location
    Edgefield, SC USA
    Posts
    4,040
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    05:24 PM
    I think many wartime Britishicon rifles were fitted with the Mk.III sights as new. I just serviced a matching serial numbers, early ROF Fazakerley No.4Mk.1 with remnants of wartime green paint and it's original two groove barrel for a client in Idaho and it had one installed. However, I don't know how early on these sights were in the production system and it may have been a replacement for a MK.II. This rifle was a learning experience in markings because it's so original. The date of manufacture is stamped on the wood below the serial number on the forend as 12/42. The only marking on the left body side is "No.4Mk.1" and the left side butt socket markings were horrible with only "ROF" and the serial number. It is also serial numbered on the top of the wood of the buttstock where it enters the butt socket like a No.4T sniper butt. The only parts I found that I know for sure were changed is the buttplate and one of the screws. It had a post 1944 Canadianicon steel buttplate added as a replacement at some point during service. It most likely had a pot metal buttplate as original. The Fazakerley socket markings were so poor that I had to consult DRP to get his opinion on who the manufacturer was because i was thinking ROF Maltby which wasn't the case.

  10. Thank You to Brian Dick For This Useful Post:


  11. #16
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    03-20-2024 @ 06:05 AM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,429
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    09:24 PM
    You can say that again Brian. It was one of the worst, most messily marked rifles I've ever seen. I suppose that should have given us a clue it was a Faz product!!

  12. Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:


  13. #17
    Advisory Panel Brian Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 02:10 PM
    Location
    Edgefield, SC USA
    Posts
    4,040
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    05:24 PM
    I've seen some wartime, post 1941 ROF Maltby rifles marked pretty badly too but usually you can find an "M" stamped on the butt socket, even if it's upside down! There wasn't one "F" stamped on any of the component parts. Just contractor codes or nothing at all. Much like the No.4T, I'd guess none of the early service rifles had standardized markings. Guessing that really didn't happen until 1943. Did you know that they stamped the date of manufacture on the front bottom of the forend under the serial number? I sure didn't. That told me pdq that it was mostly original and not sanded to death either in service or afterwards. The right side of the butt had "ZF" stamped on so it was a cull, surplused prior to 1968 with Britishicon commercial proofs. I gauged it and it barely passed all the standards but was definitely on the loose side throughout. My uneducated guess would be that it was culled because it was a bit tired all over! The point of impact with the front sight blade bottomed out to the left was a bit out of specification but I still shot a ragged hole at 25 yards after servicing and managed to hit my 2' Salute steel popper at 120 yards three times in a row using a bit of "Kentucky windage". Thank Christ some exspurt, wannabe armourer didn't destroy the draws in the forend. I see the damage from improper disassembly all the time now it seems.

  14. Thank You to Brian Dick For This Useful Post:


  15. #18
    Legacy Member Stanforth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    Last On
    08-06-2023 @ 04:36 AM
    Location
    Oxford UK
    Age
    80
    Posts
    59
    Real Name
    Geoff Ives
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:24 PM
    In a few years time, when I have shuffled off this mortal coil some one will be on here questioning my Savage No.4 MK1* with jungle carbine sight fitted.

  16. #19
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Today @ 12:25 PM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,526
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    09:24 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Stanforth View Post
    In a few years time, when I have shuffled off this mortal coil some one will be on here questioning my Savage No.4 MK1* with jungle carbine sight fitted.
    Ditto on my Savage No4 Mk1*

    The No 5 sight on a No4 gives 0.5 MOA, whilst a No4 sight on a No4 gives 1.0 MOA

    From an old thread by Parashooter :


    Parashooter – No4 Vs No5 Rear sight Threads

    At least on these two examples (original sights), there appears to be a difference in screw diameter and pitch. Given the slightly coarser thread on the 800-yard sight, the "click value" would be some 10% greater than the 1300-yard sight if both were mounted on rifles with the same sight radius - except for the fact that the 1300-yard elevation screw is double-threaded, giving it an effective pitch approximately double that of the single-thread 800-yard screw.

    On measuring the two sights shown, each click of the No.4's sight moves the slide .008" - vs. .0043" on the No.5's sight. Consequently, the 1300-yard sight gives very close to 1.0 MOA per click with the No.4 rifle's 28" sight radius while the 800-yard sight has a click value of ~0.66 MOA with the No.5's 23" sight radius and would yield ~0.55 MOA on a No.4 rifle. (Pretty much what Maxwell Smart reports in post #17 on this thread.)
    Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. Lee Enfield No4 Mk1 Sight height
    By Pete Holt in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 06-14-2018, 04:03 AM
  2. Lee Enfield Micrometer sight
    By gerard488 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-28-2018, 06:11 AM
  3. LEE ENFIELD HT SNIPER SIGHT
    By deanb in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-11-2017, 09:46 AM
  4. Enfield rear sight
    By Buntlineguy in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-03-2011, 10:24 AM
  5. Enfield No.4 sight question
    By onlycrimson in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-01-2011, 12:37 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks