Reproduction Scopes

[Warren]

Micheal et al.. That is good to hear that your scope is holding zero.
I have tightened up a fair number over the years and they are not bad at all, just some people have a real hate on for them and with no parts box to reach into I can see why.
If you bugger up a customers scope and not have parts, you are in deep dodo.
I hope to have the new RSM Mk. 3 scope pulled down in the next day or two.
I have the tools to do it and will report on my findings as I have no stake in it other than I fix a few of them for friends and RSM has graciously sent me parts.
Stay tuned ...
cheers,
Warren and
STAY SAFE OUT THERE!!!!!!

[HeyGhost]

I have an update. I recently acquired one of Roger Payne's scope mounts and I was also able to acquire a real No. 32 Mk II scope for comparison. As I suspected it would be, the Numrich scope in Roger's mount was still canted the same as it was in the reproduction mount. Also, the real No. 32 scope appeared to be correctly aligned with no noticeable cant in the reproduction mount. I can only conclude that the Numrich scope is defective and it will definitely be going back. As a side note, the No. 32 scope was a very tight fit (probably too tight) in the reproduction mount. Its a perfect fit in Roger's mount obviously.

[tr63]

Warren any updates on the reproduction No 3 scope you were going to compare to a real one ?

[Micheal Doyne]

Yes I would also be keen to know about the RSM No32mkIII