-
Legacy Member
My BSA 4T has (in my eyes) a very poor fitted rear mount, however the rifle was previously owned by a guy who shoots at the same club as Peter Laidler
, Peter has inspected it and declared it 'Pukka', and nothing to be concerned about.
Just sayin.
Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...
-
-
04-09-2020 01:55 PM
# ADS
Friends and Sponsors
-
I don't see it leaving Messrs Holland & Holland like that. Perhaps it's a genuine rifle that got stripped at some point & required the fitting of a replacement rear pad (out of military service). That would be quite feasible.
Last edited by Roger Payne; 04-09-2020 at 06:06 PM.
-
-
-
Legacy Member
I don't see it leaving Messrs Holland & Holland like that. Perhaps it's a genuine rifle that got stripped at some point & required the fitting of a replacement rear pad (out of military service).
I was thinking along similar lines, PL checked it over for me before my purchase (I bought it unseen except for photos) and he made no comment on it so I took it as being 'acceptable'.
It 'works as it should' just looks a bit ugly.
It is an RAF issue 4T and was last serviced at '34 Base Workshops Catterick' September '68
Last edited by Alan de Enfield; 04-09-2020 at 06:10 PM.
Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...
-
Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:
PM
Originally Posted by 
