+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 21 to 27 of 27

Thread: the Ishapore 2's 7.62x51

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #21
    Advisory Panel Brian Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 11:04 AM
    Location
    Edgefield, SC USA
    Posts
    4,047
    Local Date
    04-23-2024
    Local Time
    05:01 PM
    Guys who are serious shooters that want a 7.62 Lee Enfield should buy or build one on a No.4 action that isn't worn out. Even then, you're stressing them to the max so you must adhere to the military specification pressures. Those who want to push 168 and heavier projectiles at M118LR velocity, (yes, I've seen and repaired the results once. He was lucky.), are beating their old rifles to death. Stick with the 155 grain Palma Match SMK and you should be fine.

  2. Thank You to Brian Dick For This Useful Post:


  3. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  4. #22
    Contributing Member 30Three's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Last On
    04-10-2024 @ 04:55 PM
    Location
    France
    Posts
    809
    Local Date
    04-23-2024
    Local Time
    11:01 PM
    Brian, is the Forster gauge for 7.62 NATO suitable for checking headspace in the L39?
    I assume it would be dificult to find an original armorer's headspace gauge for the L39 and L42 these days.

  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #23
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Today @ 02:01 PM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,542
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    04-23-2024
    Local Time
    10:01 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Dickicon View Post
    Guys who are serious shooters that want a 7.62 Lee Enfield should buy or build one on a No.4 action that isn't worn out. Even then, you're stressing them to the max so you must adhere to the military specification pressures. Those who want to push 168 and heavier projectiles at M118LR velocity, (yes, I've seen and repaired the results once. He was lucky.), are beating their old rifles to death. Stick with the 155 grain Palma Match SMK and you should be fine.
    I think it is also relevant to point out that "what it says on the tin" is 7.62 NATO and NOT 308 Win.

    Keep the pressures down by using what is was designed to use.
    Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...

  7. #24
    Advisory Panel Brian Dick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 11:04 AM
    Location
    Edgefield, SC USA
    Posts
    4,047
    Local Date
    04-23-2024
    Local Time
    05:01 PM
    30Three, You probably need a set of .308/7.62 match gauges. The L39/L42 gauges are 1.628 Go and 1.635 No-Go.

    ---------- Post added at 06:11 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:06 PM ----------

    AdE, The .308 vs. 7.62 debate is a can of worms. To be honest, I've been interchanging them for more years than I can remember in both bolt rifles and semi-autos and have never had a problem. The same goes for .223 vs. 5.56. Many make a big deal out of it and in my opinion, it's not. The key is to use common sense and know your ammo and chamber pressures, especially if shooting Lee Enfield's.

  8. #25
    Legacy Member Daan Kemp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Last On
    Today @ 06:41 AM
    Location
    Centurion RSA
    Age
    73
    Posts
    1,397
    Real Name
    Daan Kemp
    Local Date
    04-23-2024
    Local Time
    11:01 PM
    Agree with you on the military vs commercial ammo debates. Interesting it never happens with 30-06, 303, 30-40 Kragicon, 9x19, 45ACP, etc. Only 308/7,62 and 223/5,56.

  9. #26
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Today @ 02:01 PM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,542
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    04-23-2024
    Local Time
    10:01 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Dickicon View Post
    The key is to use common sense and know your ammo and chamber pressures, especially if shooting Lee Enfield's.
    Agreed.

    The problem comes when folks don't realise what the rifle was built to use and start using other ammunition (hotter, heavier bullets etc).
    Its like your car and all its components are built to use a (say) 3 litre 300hp engine, you change it out for a 6 litre 600hp engine and then wonder why the clutch starts to slip, the geartrain components cannot handle the power, the tyres loose traction etc.
    Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...

  10. Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:


  11. #27
    Legacy Member pocketshaver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Last On
    09-23-2020 @ 04:17 AM
    Location
    usa
    Posts
    229
    Local Date
    04-23-2024
    Local Time
    04:01 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Daan Kemp View Post
    Agree with you on the military vs commercial ammo debates. Interesting it never happens with 30-06, 303, 30-40 Kragicon, 9x19, 45ACP, etc. Only 308/7,62 and 223/5,56.
    the issue with these cartridges, .308/7.62x51 and the .223 debacle is that there have been so many versions of the same cartridge given different pressure levels.

    take the 7.62x51 cetme that spain created. good round, but used light bullets at high velocity. chambers identical to .308/51 nato, but not safe for it. thus lots of issues with the converted 1916 Spanish Oviedo mausers.

    .223 and 5.56, the standard ball round of 55 grain IS the exact cartridge released as .223 Remington. That has been admitted by saami SO MANY TIMES its not funny. the only issue is that....

    1.there have been two updated versions of the 5.56 nato that increased NATO pressure chamber EPVAT testing limits to deal with increased bullet weights.

    2. ORIGINAL Vietnam production M16s given the original chamber and .223 ammunition SAFETLY use the higher pressured forms of 5.56 nato that are supposedly unsafe in .223 Remington chambers

    3. CIP declares .223 Remington and 5.56 nato to BE THE SAME CARTRIDGE and firearms MUST be safe to use with both.

    4. ARs with .223 Remington on the barrel are actually given 5.56 nato chambers. And people have discovered DECADES ago that any modern rifle with a .223 ONLY needs a few minutes of touchup with a 5.56 nato finish reamer to get the lead taken care of , and can instantly use ANY 5.56 cartridge

    5. SAAMI ONLY uses the original .223 Remington pressure levels.

    6. commercially produced 5.56 nato ammunition, even the 55 gr fmj clones are allowed to be loaded to ANY of the 3 nato pressure levels. Thus they are not actually safe to use in an unmodified chamber.
    I got that from SAAMI and Federal Cartridge

    7. only way to get actual mil spec 55 gran fmj is to have it come with a nato head stamp. No one is techinically sure if the IMI 55 grn fmj meets original spec

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Similar Threads

  1. CG93E, 7.62x51
    By diopter in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-24-2020, 02:08 PM
  2. Help with selecting a scope for Ishapore Enfield 2A1 in 7.62x51
    By tasum in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 06-16-2013, 06:35 PM
  3. M1 Garand in 7.62X51
    By Garandiose in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 01-24-2011, 01:24 PM
  4. IVI 7.62x51 Brass & the M1A
    By shottist in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-07-2010, 09:45 PM
  5. M1 Breda in 7.62x51
    By medic2264 in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 07-29-2009, 09:21 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts