+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24

Thread: This is why you fully inspect your new rifle...

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #11
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    4,651
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    11:29 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by tatou View Post
    It was broken off at some point for sure ... by who, we will never know.
    One thing for sure is who ever tried to repair it wasn't a qualified gunsmith (god i hope not)
    Here's a few more pictures.
    The first is of the rifle when i got it ... at first glance it looks rater nice.

    Next one... the collar doesn't even touch the back of the cut bolt head. It is fully inserted.

    You can see holes in the welds making the integrity of the repair rater sketchy to say the least. The repair is also crooked.

    No idea what happened at the back but someone seems to have thought hitting it would help things.

    And last but not least the repaired tip being too thick for the hole he decided to enlarge the hole.... yet like i mentioned and showed above it is still too small.
    Guessing by then he just gave up on ''fixing'' it.
    Was wondering what was done about the tapered hole in the bolt head.

    The cocking piece would soon have started to loosen up slamming into the back of the bolt, hence the peening in an attempt to tighten it up probably.
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

  2. Thank You to Surpmil For This Useful Post:


  3. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  4. #12
    Legacy Member Mk VII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    03-20-2024 @ 07:30 PM
    Location
    England
    Age
    62
    Posts
    1,406
    Real Name
    James West
    Local Date
    03-30-2024
    Local Time
    06:29 AM
    I was handed one where the striker stuck fast in the bolthead when the trigger was pulled, making it difficult to cock. It was a de-act, so not safety-critical.

    Eventually decided someone had put a No.4 striker in it.

    Made a brass collar to go on top of the striker collar and keep it further back from the bolthead.

  5. Thank You to Mk VII For This Useful Post:


  6. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  7. #13
    Legacy Member Bruce_in_Oz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 06:50 AM
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,237
    Local Date
    03-30-2024
    Local Time
    04:29 PM
    LE / SMLE strikers have a different thread from No4 strikers: 1/4 x 30 TPI (Enfield Special) vs 26 TPI (1/4" BSF) on the No4.

    LE strikers are also longer because of the greater length of the "tail" on the bolt body and the cocking piece that fits over it. As for the bashing on the tail of that striker; maybe the lock-crew was missing at some stage and bubba "peened" the thread.

    The striker is supposed to be an extremely "close" fit in the cocking piece. This is to be achieved, not by any "locking" effect of the thread, but by the striker body diameter and parallelism being a "perfect" fit into the matching, similarly precisely-made hole in the body of the cocking piece. "Wobbly' cocking pieces are a major threat to the safety of the trigger/ sear operation.

  8. Thank You to Bruce_in_Oz For This Useful Post:


  9. #14
    Legacy Member tatou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    11-12-2023 @ 04:55 PM
    Posts
    281
    Local Date
    03-30-2024
    Local Time
    01:29 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Mk VII View Post
    Made a brass collar to go on top of the striker collar and keep it further back from the bolt head.
    My initial thought was to save the bolt head by doing something like this but the enlarged striker hole worries me too much...
    Even though i don't plan to shoot it, being DP, i still like for it to be in as much good order than i can make it.
    I have the parts so might as well use them. If i need them for something else i'll know where they are.
    It still a work in progress so i might decide on another direction before i'm done.

    ---------- Post added at 03:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:21 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce_in_Oz View Post
    The striker is supposed to be an extremely "close" fit in the cocking piece. This is to be achieved, not by any "locking" effect of the thread, but by the striker body diameter and parallelism being a "perfect" fit into the matching, similarly precisely-made hole in the body of the cocking piece. "Wobbly' cocking pieces are a major threat to the safety of the trigger/ sear operation.
    This is the most unsafe (at least that's how i felt) rifle repair i've come across so far.
    I've seen deep pits but these were not cause by someone.
    The person that did this probably fired dozens if not hundreds of rounds and never had problems, but the trouble who knows when it would have failed.

  10. #15
    Legacy Member 5thBatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 06:38 PM
    Location
    Zombie Town, now with a H
    Posts
    774
    Local Date
    03-30-2024
    Local Time
    07:29 PM
    Most of the NZicon Carbines were stamped DP & the firing pins tip were snipped off (mine still remains in that form) a lot have been "reactivated" over the years

  11. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to 5thBatt For This Useful Post:


  12. #16
    Legacy Member tatou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    11-12-2023 @ 04:55 PM
    Posts
    281
    Local Date
    03-30-2024
    Local Time
    01:29 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by 5thBatt View Post
    Most of the NZicon Carbines were stamped DP & the firing pins tip were snipped off (mine still remains in that form) a lot have been "reactivated" over the years
    I have two of them, one that was sporterized and the other that wasn't and both have DP markings.
    Now that you mention it, i took a closer look at the full length stock one and the striker tip does protrudes but as a suspicious sharp edges (squarish) were it should be rounded off.
    I'll have to check on that but my guess is that striker tip was also rebuild.

    I'm in the final stage of finishing the stock on the sportrized one and was also checking the new bolt head, i noticed it would have to be fitted to the old body since the rotation is not enough. (sometimes you get lucky and they fit right off the bat)
    Funny you mention you left your's in that ''snipped'' form...
    I was thinking about mine and since i wasn't planing on firing it because it's a DP and that fitting a new bolt head would be pointless.
    I would simply chop the ''fix'' off the old striker, fix the back end as best i can and reinstall both the old head and striker in the rifle.
    I have no real reason to have it fully functional and working on matting the parts is kind of pointless (except to satisfy my OCD)
    The bolt head is from a fully working bolt assembly and i would hate to risk not having it fit properly in case i need it for the future.

  13. #17
    Legacy Member tatou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    11-12-2023 @ 04:55 PM
    Posts
    281
    Local Date
    03-30-2024
    Local Time
    01:29 AM
    Thread Starter
    So i've finished restoring my second NZicon Carbine (DP) and sure enough the firing pin looks funky.
    Although the work on this one appears to be better, it lacks ''refinement''
    Looks to me, he or they, lengthened a SMLE striker by cutting it and adding a length of pin to it.
    What i am wondering, and maybe those of you that know about brazing can tell me is why was the cuts made like V notches... does it give the brazing more strength ?
    Still not planning on firing that one neither but i am intrigued by the technique used (i know next to nothing about brazing or welding).
    Attachment 111284Attachment 111285Attachment 111286

  14. #18
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 12:34 AM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,840
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    11:29 PM
    When we welded something like that firing pin body we sharpened it like a pencil in the lathe. Then you build it up. You can't weld two ends together without filling it. Cutting the groove gives you edges to weld to. Then you carefully take it down. I had to do a '73 Winchester firing pin once...HAD to as there were no replacements.
    Regards, Jim

  15. Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post:


  16. #19
    Legacy Member tatou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    11-12-2023 @ 04:55 PM
    Posts
    281
    Local Date
    03-30-2024
    Local Time
    01:29 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by browningautorifleicon View Post
    When we welded something like that firing pin body we sharpened it like a pencil in the lathe. Then you build it up. You can't weld two ends together without filling it. Cutting the groove gives you edges to weld to. Then you carefully take it down. I had to do a '73 Winchester firing pin once...HAD to as there were no replacements.
    Thank you for the explanation Jim. I had a feeling that was the reason but like i said, i'm pretty much useless when it comes to anything welding or brazing.

  17. Thank You to tatou For This Useful Post:


  18. #20
    Legacy Member bombdoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Last On
    03-14-2024 @ 05:12 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    170
    Local Date
    03-30-2024
    Local Time
    06:29 AM
    The fundamental difference between welding and brazing is that welding is achieved by melting and fuzing the original metal forming the joint, optionally adding material of the same type. Brazing and similar processes such as silver soldering or hard soldering uses a different metal to achieve the joint.

    In brazing, the jointing material invariably has a lower melting point to the base metal, however the jointing action is achieved by the filler metal alloying with the surface of the base metal. Ideally the thickness of the layer of jointing metal should be as thin as possible so that the majority of the joint is made from alloyed material, which is usually stronger than the filler. Brazing alloys are usually made to have the lowest melting point achievable (eutectic alloys) which means that they go straight from solid to liquid with no "pasty" stage. This means that they are able to flow up narrow spaces by capillary action. As a result, the best brazed joints are made by cleaning up the jointing surfaces, but leaving only a small gap between them. When the joint is heated up and the brazing material added (after fluxing to chemically clean the surfaces!) the metal flows almost instantly up the joint giving a very strong bond.

    Welding is a fundamentally different process. In welding, the base material has to be brought up to, or very close to, its melting point. In the old days, fire welding was achieved with alloys such as wrought iron by bringing the parts up to a "pasty" state where there was a mixture of solid and liquid material, and then hammering the parts together to achieve fusion. This was the process by which Damascus barrels were produced, but could only be done with certain alloys which had a "pasty" state as they melted. Welding pure metal or Euctectic alloy was only achievable when gas and electric methods of bringing steel up to melting point were developed. Welding is achieved by creating a puddle of liquid metal between the elements being welded. As the base material is being melted, you cannot achieve the fine gaps needed to create capillary joints. In a weld, the depth of the weld is limited to the depth of the weld pool, which is invariably less than the thickness of the material you are welding unless it is very thin (which causes other issues!). It is difficult in welding to fill gaps as the surface tension of the materials in the weld pool is quite high.

    Welded joints are therefore much more of a surface effect than braised joints, and if a through weld is required, space has to be created to take the weld material which is added to fill the void. In practice a bevel is ground off the edges of the elements to be joined and a bead of weld run along the groove thus created. This is the reason for the V section in the welds illustrated above. One of the main criteria in weld design is the required weld penetration depth, and shallow welds are one of the primary causes of weld failure.

    The choice of whether to braze or weld is not, as popularly considered, that of absolute strength, but more the nature of the join. A good brazed joint can be as strong as a weld if properly designed and carried out!

    Someone once told me that the way of understanding welds and braised joints is to think about braising as using glue, whereas welding was more like using duct tape...!
    Last edited by bombdoc; 09-27-2020 at 07:32 AM.

  19. The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to bombdoc For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. The M1 Carbine concept fully developed
    By imarangemaster in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 12-18-2018, 10:45 AM
  2. Inspect those used revolvers carefully.
    By WarPig1976 in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 05-14-2015, 12:45 PM
  3. What does FTR fully mean?
    By RJW NZ in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-17-2012, 06:55 AM
  4. Fully Functioning Sniper Rifle
    By Alan de Enfield in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 06-14-2010, 04:24 AM
  5. Inspect your Garands from CMP when you get them.
    By Gus Fisher in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 06-21-2009, 07:48 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks