+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: Help Identify this Number 4 Mk. 2

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member davidwrankin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Last On
    04-26-2021 @ 07:37 PM
    Location
    Central Kentucky, USA
    Posts
    15
    Real Name
    David W. Rankin, Jr.
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:13 AM

    Help Identify this Number 4 Mk. 2

    About 15 years ago, I had to sell an Enfield (don't even remember if it was a Mk. 1 or a No. 4 now) that my mother had gotten me (bills to pay, etc.), and I was telling number one son this year that I'd like another if I could find one that wasn't pulling a king's ransom. Before asking me, and not knowing anything about RTI's reputation, he had a "A condition" No. 4 Mk. 1 headed to the local gunstore.

    I got it in, and RTI had a few things wrong. They said that the guns were WW2 surplus No 4 Mk 1s that were shipped to Ethiopia. However, I had a No 4 Mk 2 (confirmed when I pulled the trigger guard with the trigger attached). As you can see from the pictures, the gun looks like it has had most marking stripped. The "No 4 Mk 2" looks almost handmade. The one stamp I trust the most is the barrel stamp, and as the picture shows, it says "1953". Definitely not WW2 surplus.

    Obviously someone reconditioned it enough to re-stamp the serial number onto the magazine. All the serial numbers still on the gun match (including the bolt). I also cleaned a ton of copper and powder out of the barrel, so it's been shot a bunch. The wood is Savage marked. I don't think it's a Khyber Pass clone; if it were I would think it'd have more marks of lower quality.

    I have headspaced the bolt, and a SAAMI Field (.072) gauge won't let the bolt close. The barrel has no bulges, signs of cracking or stress, etc. The barrel looks clean and grooving is very good (the bullet throat and barrel end are both a bit deeper than I'd like, but not worn out by any stretch). I'm going to fasten it to a shooting rest and rope-fire a couple of Remington rounds to test it out before putting my head near the bolt.

    I have a theory about the origin, but before I pose my uninformed ideas, I'll pose the following questions to the forum:
    1> Where do you think this gun came from?
    2> Is there a reason to not fire this gun, based on the pictures and evidence above, or the answer to 1 above?

    (Sorry to not have pictures of the bolt, but it looks bog-standard, and the serial number matches the "font" and layout of the other serial numbers.)

    Attachment 110202Attachment 110203Attachment 110204Attachment 110205Attachment 110206Attachment 110207Attachment 110208Attachment 110209Attachment 110211Attachment 110212Attachment 110213Attachment 110214Attachment 110215

    This is the remains of the butt stock mark, but I need to get some tracing paper and charcoal and see if I can trace it:
    Attachment 110210
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 12:49 PM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,526
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    09:13 AM
    It certainly has had an interesting history and appears to have parts from all the major manufacturers

    The barrel was fitted in 1953 by BSA
    The action looks to be a Fazakerley
    It has Savage (USAicon) parts
    And some other metal parts made by Metal Box Ltd (London)

    There have been 100's of posts about these RTI rifles and the vast majority are 'not very complimentary' varying from unsafe, to major parts missing to way, way overpriced for what they are.
    Yours doesn't look 'too bad'
    Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...

  4. Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:


  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #3
    Legacy Member GeeRam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Last On
    03-18-2024 @ 03:21 PM
    Location
    Berkshire, UK
    Posts
    853
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    09:13 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Alan de Enfield View Post
    And some other metal parts made by Metal Box Ltd (London)
    My late mother used to work there.

  7. #4
    Contributing Member 30Three's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Last On
    03-19-2024 @ 03:50 PM
    Location
    France
    Posts
    809
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:13 AM
    You might want to unblock the gas release hole, as seen in the first photo. Could this be an FTR to mk2 spec trigger? The side of the receiver appears to have been machined to remove markings at the front lefthand side.

  8. Thank You to 30Three For This Useful Post:


  9. #5
    Legacy Member SpikeDD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last On
    08-07-2020 @ 06:05 AM
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    257
    Real Name
    David
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    05:13 AM
    It has all the looks of a post war BSA FTR. It wouldn't have been a Mk.2, but rather a Mk.1/2 or 1/3. Someone other than the arsenal put those marks on it. In photo 3, you can see the remnants of the electro penciled " F.T.R. 19...53 most likely. These are signature BSA FTR markings.
    David

  10. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to SpikeDD For This Useful Post:


  11. #6
    Legacy Member Maxwell Smart's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last On
    03-03-2024 @ 07:37 AM
    Location
    Queensland, Australia
    Posts
    411
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:13 AM
    BSA FTR

  12. Thank You to Maxwell Smart For This Useful Post:


  13. #7
    Legacy Member davidwrankin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Last On
    04-26-2021 @ 07:37 PM
    Location
    Central Kentucky, USA
    Posts
    15
    Real Name
    David W. Rankin, Jr.
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:13 AM
    Thread Starter
    Thanks for the replies. Sorry about not replying sooner, been fighting a stomach virus (fortunately NOT the beer-named virus...) for the last few days.

    Quote Originally Posted by 30Three View Post
    You might want to unblock the gas release hole, as seen in the first photo.
    Sorry, pictures are from a week or two back, wasn't done cleaning it then. It's open now. Thanks for the warning.

    Quote Originally Posted by Maxwell Smart View Post
    BSA FTR
    Quote Originally Posted by 30Three View Post
    Could this be an FTR to mk2 spec trigger? The side of the receiver appears to have been machined to remove markings at the front lefthand side.
    Quote Originally Posted by SpikeDD View Post
    It has all the looks of a post war BSA FTR. It wouldn't have been a Mk.2, but rather a Mk.1/2 or 1/3. Someone other than the arsenal put those marks on it. In photo 3, you can see the remnants of the electro penciled " F.T.R. 19...53 most likely. These are signature BSA FTR markings.
    I thought I had a clear picture of the right side of the receiver, but I didn't put it in (no remains of interesting markings, basically blank). It's got the push-button bolt release, so it's not a 1/3.

    Is there an easy way to identify the difference between a Mk 1/2 receiver and a Mk 2 receiver? Looking closer, picture 4 has a decent shot at the left side of the trigger pin and picture 9 has a picture of the right side of the trigger pin. As you can see, it's been re-blacked, so it's hard to tell what materials are involved. If I can do an easy test (that's not too destructive on the finish) to determine materials, I don't mind doing so.

    Can we trust the serial number to be a factory number? So far, I'm only seeing 2 manufacturers who used Axxxx as a standalone range. One is the POFicon for their parts guns, but Axxxx appears to be a 1952 range, so that doesn't seem to fit. If Axxxx is a BSA Shirley number, then that would point to my rifle as being an early Shirley Mk.1 that was then converted (probably in 53) to a 1/2.

    Still leaves how the markings got stripped (and the gun re-blacked) and how the rifle got to Ethiopia a mystery. I'm leaning towards a Pakistan -> India -> Ethiopia path myself, but did India ever strip No. 4 markings and then not come back and remark them themselves?

    Can we learn anything from the "No. 4 Mk 2" label? It looks hand-lettered to me, but if it matches some other known agents' stamps, that would be interesting.

    Thanks,
    David

  14. #8
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    4,651
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    02:13 AM
    To answer directly: I can't see any reason it wouldn't be safe to shoot from what you have told and shown us.

    There may be stamps on the rear face of the action that would tell us conclusively who made the receiver ("body" in Britishicon parlance.) Speaking of terminology, is "bog-standard" a phrase used down KY way; I always thought that was another British term?

    I don't ever remember seeing the Mk2 designation stamped into the receiver wall like that but, maybe others here have?

    I thought at first that the SN was probably changed, but I think I can see traces of two "8"s there just to the left of the stamps, so probably just a case of electro-pencilled markings being over-struck to make them more durable, as was done in service at times.

    If the original SN is A1848 that suggests a very early receiver. There are some folks here who could say more about that.

    The fact that it was found in good enough condition for conversion in 195_ suggests it didn't have too hard a war.
    Last edited by Surpmil; 08-03-2020 at 11:27 PM. Reason: Revised
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

  15. Thank You to Surpmil For This Useful Post:


  16. #9
    Legacy Member davidwrankin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Last On
    04-26-2021 @ 07:37 PM
    Location
    Central Kentucky, USA
    Posts
    15
    Real Name
    David W. Rankin, Jr.
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:13 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Surpmil View Post
    Speaking of terminology, is "bog-standard" a phrase used down KY way; I always thought that was another Britishicon term?
    I am Kentucky born and bred, but I have loved British TV shows since I was old enough to find Mystery on PBS myself. (Last of the Summer Wine is getting copied from legal Region 2 DVDs to my media server as we speak.) I accidentally catch myself using British English slang and spelling without meaning to.

    Milady was also from Eastern Kentucky, they occasionally kept older English sayings going (and she was also a British TV junkie, more than I am), so might have picked it up from her too.

    Back to the gun. I decided that, rather than post more pictures, I'd throw together a quick YouTube tear-down and video of every marking still on the gun. I've posted it at , and we'll see if I can embed it:



    The video makes it a lot clearer that someone went to a lot of effort to clear off all the obvious armory markings. Hopefully what is left is enough to hazard a guess, at least.

    I have to admit, No. 1 Son's RTI purchase has been interesting, at the very least. I still think he overpaid for the condition this gun was in (and the amount of crap (literal and figurative) I cleaned off it....), but trying to solve this mystery has been fun.

    It also inspired me to order a "pigsticker", Aussie stripper clips, and WW1/WW2 surplus ammo pouches to make up a collection.

  17. #10
    Legacy Member Giove's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Last On
    Today @ 05:12 AM
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    255
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    10:13 AM
    In my opinion the S.N. was changed in India. I have an Indian sniper with a S.N. replaced completely similar to this.

    Tha stamp on the butt-stock (508 in the circle) identifies an Indian depot.

  18. Thank You to Giove For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Remington M1917 Serial Number (High serial number)
    By roadking in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 03-30-2017, 12:23 AM
  2. Can anyone identify this?
    By Cofaler in forum Military Shotguns
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-11-2015, 11:34 PM
  3. Receiver drawing number consisten with Serial Number
    By cooterboro in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-17-2012, 06:18 PM
  4. can someone help me identify this.....
    By moni81 in forum Edged Weapons Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-23-2011, 04:54 PM
  5. Help identify this Jap please
    By flatheadsal in forum Japanese Rifles
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-15-2011, 04:10 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks