+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Krag Rifle Identification Help

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legacy Member polandaj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Last On
    01-21-2021 @ 12:23 PM
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    6
    Real Name
    Andrew
    Local Date
    04-25-2024
    Local Time
    07:28 AM

    Krag Rifle Identification Help

    New to Kragicon rifles but did some research. Any identification help would be much appreciated.

    From what I can tell, this would be a M1892 rifle with 1901 pattern rear sight that was cut down to a 22" barrel. The receiver has "1894" on it and is in the 18,7xx serial number range. One source shows it was made in 1895 and another showed 1896. One of those sources mentioned some 'full stock' 1894 carbines - but I would imaging those are all known/accounted for and/or super rare.

    Looks different from other 'sporterized' rifles I've seen - maybe the work of a good gunsmith at some point with what looks like the stock forearm being re-shaped to taper down and fit the ferrule/cap under the muzzle. The stock is still one piece, it's not been cut at the band - just appears to be re-shaped. There are no markings on the front sight or stock "cap". I did take it apart and the screw on the bottom of the stock "cap" is shallow threaded into the barrel. The front sight has a protective hood that slides off.

    I would imagine this front sight was a sporting sight, not a military arsenal sight?

    Attachment 111928
    Attachment 111929
    Attachment 111930
    Attachment 111931
    Attachment 111932
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. Thank You to polandaj For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 06:06 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,927
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    04-25-2024
    Local Time
    06:28 AM
    Not a military piece of any sort but a VERY cool hunting rifle at the very least. That would be one, if the bore is nice...I would love to have. No, It's a sporter.
    Regards, Jim

  4. Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post:


  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #3
    Legacy Member butlersrangers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 12:25 AM
    Location
    S.E. Michigan, U.S.A.
    Posts
    737
    Local Date
    04-25-2024
    Local Time
    09:28 AM
    'polandaj' - Your Kragicon, #187XX, is a U.S. model 1892, that was assembled around July or August, 1895.

    With the model 1901 rear-sight & hand-guard and 'hold-open' pin on the extractor, it likely that it was up-dated, later, to more of a model 1896 configuration.
    (It is likely your receiver was later 'notched' for the hold-open pin on your extractor. IIRC - This alteration was done to early receivers in 1897 and 1902).

    I think that you are correct about your Krag being turned into a rather nice 'Mannicher-style' Hunting rifle by a professional Gunsmith.

    It is far nicer than most 'sportered' Krags.

    (FWIW - Only two prototype-carbines were built on model 1892 actions and they are accounted for).
    Last edited by butlersrangers; 10-29-2020 at 12:35 PM.

  7. Thank You to butlersrangers For This Useful Post:


  8. #4
    Legacy Member butlersrangers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 12:25 AM
    Location
    S.E. Michigan, U.S.A.
    Posts
    737
    Local Date
    04-25-2024
    Local Time
    09:28 AM
    'polandaj' - I am curious.

    Your Kragicon appears to have a model 1896 or 1898 Bolt with the pin protruding from the extractor and other later features.

    Is your receiver 'notched' to accept this pin, when the Bolt is drawn to the rear?

    Attachment 111933

  9. #5
    Legacy Member polandaj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Last On
    01-21-2021 @ 12:23 PM
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    6
    Real Name
    Andrew
    Local Date
    04-25-2024
    Local Time
    07:28 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by butlersrangers View Post
    'polandaj' - I am curious.
    Your Kragicon appears to have a model 1896 or 1898 Bolt with the pin protruding from the extractor and other later features.
    Is your receiver 'notched' to accept this pin, when the Bolt is drawn to the rear?
    Hi 'butlersrangers', I had purchased a lot that contained three Krag rifles, what appears to be an unmolested 1898 rifle with bayonet, an unmolested 1896 carbine - and this 1892 sporter. I can't be 100% certain that I didn't mix up the bolts between the rifles - but I just snapped these pics of the 1892 in question in this thread. it does have a notch in the receiver for the extractor pin to hold the bolt open.

    Attachment 111935
    Attachment 111934

  10. Thank You to polandaj For This Useful Post:


  11. #6
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 06:06 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,927
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    04-25-2024
    Local Time
    06:28 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by polandaj View Post
    I had purchased a lot that contained three Kragicon rifles,
    Love to see them all if you have the time to do an expose' on them...always nice for later reference here. I just like to look at clean Krags.
    Regards, Jim

  12. #7
    Legacy Member polandaj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Last On
    01-21-2021 @ 12:23 PM
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    6
    Real Name
    Andrew
    Local Date
    04-25-2024
    Local Time
    07:28 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by butlersrangers View Post
    'polandaj' - Your Kragicon, #187XX, is a U.S. model 1892, that was assembled around July or August, 1895.

    With the model 1901 rear-sight & hand-guard and 'hold-open' pin on the extractor, it likely that it was up-dated, later, to more of a model 1896 configuration.
    (It is likely your receiver was later 'notched' for the hold-open pin on your extractor. IIRC - This alteration was done to early receivers in 1897 and 1902).
    The rest of the thread made me go back and check the 1892 sporter again. The 1901 pattern rear sight has the "C" mark on the base and the leaf is graduated to 2000 yds. I'm guessing the person that commissioned the work or gunsmith that decided to modify this rifle was able to obtain a carbine sight to match the 22" barrel modification. You can also see where wood was added to fill in where the cleaning rod channel would have been exposed by the tapering down of the stock. Filled in very well.

    Attachment 112042Attachment 112043Attachment 112044Attachment 112045

  13. Thank You to polandaj For This Useful Post:


  14. #8
    Legacy Member butlersrangers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 12:25 AM
    Location
    S.E. Michigan, U.S.A.
    Posts
    737
    Local Date
    04-25-2024
    Local Time
    09:28 AM
    'polandaj' - Your m-1901 sight is a 'mixmaster'.

    The leaf for the 1901 carbine sight goes to '23' (for 2,300 yards) and the 'slide' does not shift to the 'left', as you move it up the leaf.

    The m-1901 rifle leaf only goes to '20' and has the built in correction for 'bullet drift'.

    (The Kragicon carbines were not showing the same bullet deviation and drift issues as the full length rifles so there was no drift compensation built into the leaf).

    You have a 1901 carbine sight 'lower base' and a 1901 rifle 'upper base'. It doesn't really matter on your nice sporter.

    The wood patch in the 'cleaning-rod' groove of your stock was done at Springfield Armory. This was part of the updates done around 1897 and 1902 to make model 1892 Krags into a model 1896 configuration.

    Your Krags tell some interesting stories!

    Attached - 1901 rifle (bottom) and carbine (top) leaf & slides compared.

    Attachment 112055
    Last edited by butlersrangers; 11-01-2020 at 11:10 PM.

  15. #9
    Legacy Member Daan Kemp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Last On
    Today @ 09:26 AM
    Location
    Centurion RSA
    Age
    73
    Posts
    1,397
    Real Name
    Daan Kemp
    Local Date
    04-25-2024
    Local Time
    03:28 PM
    Looks like a very nice sporterised Kragicon. With a good bore and all parts working correctly, it should be a a valuable addition.

  16. Thank You to Daan Kemp For This Useful Post:


  17. #10
    Legacy Member butlersrangers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 12:25 AM
    Location
    S.E. Michigan, U.S.A.
    Posts
    737
    Local Date
    04-25-2024
    Local Time
    09:28 AM
    'polandaj' - Thanks for responding about your "1894" marked receiver. The 'notch' was done at Springfield Armory during a 'program' to update early rifles to a model 1896 configuration. This happened in 1897 and 1902, (if I recall correctly). The receivers required 'local' annealing in the area where the hold-open 'notch' was cut, so the work was done at the Armory.

    IMHO -You have a nice looking representation of a model 1896 "Carbine", put in a correct carbine stock.

    Your receiver, #58783, was likely once part of a rifle, assembled around March, 1897.
    This serial number is not in a known range for model 1896 carbines.

    Your rear-sight is a model 1896 rifle sight. The leaf is only calibrated to '18' (1,800 yards). The carbine sight is similar, but, has "C" markings on the base and leaf. The carbine leaf is calibrated to '20' (2,000 yards).

    (A correct 1896 carbine rear-sight sells for over $500, by itself).

    I hope you were not taken advantage of on the "carbine".

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Rifle Identification
    By ClassicMark in forum Martini Henry Rifles
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-06-2024, 05:33 AM
  2. Rifle Identification
    By welsh13ik in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-04-2017, 12:30 AM
  3. 30/40 krag identification help
    By Foxx9914 in forum Krag Rifles
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-08-2017, 05:53 PM
  4. Rifle Identification
    By mbs4n6 in forum Pattern 1913/1914 and M1917 Rifles
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-27-2015, 08:11 AM
  5. 30-40 Krag Identification
    By RCS in forum Ammunition and Reloading for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-27-2011, 04:56 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts