+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: 7.62 hand loading for L42s

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Contributing Member Micheal Doyne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Last On
    03-15-2024 @ 06:20 PM
    Location
    Wiltshire Uk
    Posts
    395
    Real Name
    Ed Vigors
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    08:25 AM

    7.62 hand loading for L42s

    So I uber got my self into a little bit of a confusion on what is safe to hand load for my L42 clone, it is made from all original parts with a 20 tons proof. I can only find official load data for 308 Win, or people’s kids data for 7.62 NATO. I am aware that both 308 win and modern 7.62 are more powerful than L2A2 ball, and I am rather concerned that 20 Tons per square inch is only 44,800 psi and my published data likely being for SAAMI 308 at 62,000 psi.
    So am I just being over sensitive or does any one have any pushed load data or personal that they can share?

    Component wise I am happy to consider anything readily available in the uk, but I have on hand: N140, IWI and GGG cases, CCI BR primers, and Sierra 150 SMK or 155 TMK bullets.

    Thoughts?
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Legacy Member Strangely Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 01:27 PM
    Location
    Wiltshire UK
    Age
    72
    Posts
    551
    Real Name
    Mick Kelly
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    07:25 AM
    44gr's of N140 under a 150 SMK was the "standard" during the transitional years when people were still using a lot of No.4 actions. Max load is quoted in the Hornady book for N140 & 150gr as 45.8gr.

    I used 44gr & 150 SMK's in all of my No.4 conversions.
    Mick

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Contributing Member CINDERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 08:42 AM
    Location
    South West Western Australia
    Posts
    7,730
    Real Name
    CINDERS
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    03:25 PM
    Here is some load data however it is probably for a Remington, think its the Load Data for the M118 round.

  6. #4
    Contributing Member Micheal Doyne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Last On
    03-15-2024 @ 06:20 PM
    Location
    Wiltshire Uk
    Posts
    395
    Real Name
    Ed Vigors
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    08:25 AM
    Thread Starter
    Thank you very much to both, of you! And apologies for the miss locating my original listing.
    Last edited by Micheal Doyne; 11-01-2020 at 05:29 PM.

  7. #5
    Advisory Panel Lee Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    03-16-2024 @ 12:24 PM
    Location
    out there
    Posts
    1,820
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    01:25 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Micheal Doyne View Post
    So I uber got my self into a little bit of a confusion on what is safe to hand load for my L42 clone, it is made from all original parts with a 20 tons proof. I can only find official load data for 308 Win, or people’s kids data for 7.62 NATO. I am aware that both 308 win and modern 7.62 are more powerful than L2A2 ball, and I am rather concerned that 20 Tons per square inch is only 44,800 psi and my published data likely being for SAAMI 308 at 62,000 psi.
    So am I just being over sensitive or does any one have any pushed load data or personal that they can share?

    Component wise I am happy to consider anything readily available in the uk, but I have on hand: N140, IWI and GGG cases, CCI BR primers, and Sierra 150 SMK or 155 TMK bullets.

    Thoughts?
    There is a lot of BS floated regarding 7.62 conversions of the Lee Enfield.

    Simply put, be aware that .308Win and .303 Britishicon have identical case capacity of 56 grains of water.

    If you are concerned with weakness of the No4 action when converted to .308/7.62 simply use .303British load data for that weight of projectile.

    It may (or not) surprise you to know that the common fall back load 174-180grain bullets for .303 Brit of 41-42grains of IMR4895 - is the exact same load used for 7.62 NATO 175grain (and 168grain) match loadings....

    As always, load data is specific to my firearms, primers, cases used, bullet seating ect play a role in creating pressure.
    Last edited by Lee Enfield; 11-01-2020 at 02:14 PM.
    BSN from the Republic of Alberta

    http://www.cartridgecollectors.org/

  8. Thank You to Lee Enfield For This Useful Post:


  9. #6
    Advisory Panel Parashooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 01:14 AM
    Location
    Connecticut
    Age
    79
    Posts
    677
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    03:25 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Micheal Doyne View Post
    . . . I am rather concerned that 20 Tons per square inch is only 44,800 psi and my published data likely being for SAAMI 308 at 62,000 psi. . .
    You are comparing apples and pomegranates. The 20 ton (44800 lb.) figure is the archaic axial crusher measurement (normally some 10-15% below SAAMI radial crusher figures - expressed today as "CUP") and the SAAMI 62000 psi number is a piezo transducer result. SAAMI MAP for .308 Win. is 52000 CUP. Essentially, all these numbers represent the same pressure - it's the measuring systems that differ.

    As a sanity check, consider the .303 Britishicon at -
    41440 lb. (18.5 tons) axial crusher,
    45000 CUP SAAMI crusher MAP,
    49000 psi SAAMI transducer MAP.

  10. #7
    Contributing Member Micheal Doyne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Last On
    03-15-2024 @ 06:20 PM
    Location
    Wiltshire Uk
    Posts
    395
    Real Name
    Ed Vigors
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    08:25 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Lee Enfield View Post
    There is a lot of BS floated regarding 7.62 conversions of the Lee Enfield.

    Simply put, be aware that .308Win and .303 Britishicon have identical case capacity of 56 grains of water.

    If you are concerned with weakness of the No4 action when converted to .308/7.62 simply use .303British load data for that weight of projectile.

    It may (or not) surprise you to know that the common fall back load 174-180grain bullets for .303 Brit of 41-42grains of IMR4895 - is the exact same load used for 7.62 NATO 175grain (and 168grain) match loadings....

    As always, load data is specific to my firearms, primers, cases used, bullet seating ect play a role in creating pressure.
    That is very interesting. I had not realised the case capacities where the same, looking at the them I would have always assumed .303 was greater.

    Will a 7.62 round with the same mass bullet not develop more chamber pressure due to the bottle neck carriage and relatively smaller bullet diameter? That said will I would assume that to be the case, I have no idea if it is material or not? Any fluid dynamics experts please chime in now...

    ---------- Post added at 05:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:15 PM ----------

    Quote Originally Posted by Parashooter View Post
    You are comparing apples and pomegranates. The 20 ton (44800 lb.) figure is the archaic axial crusher measurement (normally some 10-15% below SAAMI radial crusher figures - expressed today as "CUP") and the SAAMI 62000 psi number is a piezo transducer result. SAAMI MAP for .308 Win. is 52000 CUP. Essentially, all these numbers represent the same pressure - it's the measuring systems that differ.

    As a sanity check, consider the .303 British at -
    41440 lb. (18.5 tons) axial crusher,
    45000 CUP SAAMI crusher MAP,
    49000 psi SAAMI transducer MAP.
    Thank you I was really hoping some one would come in with this! I could remember reading this a while back (before I had a 7.62) but couldn’t find it so was hoping this would prove it without leading too much. Cheers!

  11. #8
    Advisory Panel Parashooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 01:14 AM
    Location
    Connecticut
    Age
    79
    Posts
    677
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    03:25 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Micheal Doyne View Post
    Will a 7.62 round with the same mass bullet not develop more chamber pressure due to the bottle neck carriage and relatively smaller bullet diameter? That said will I would assume that to be the case, I have no idea if it is material or not? Any fluid dynamics experts please chime in now...
    The practical effect of either or both of these factors is negligible in this case.

  12. #9
    Legacy Member Daan Kemp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Last On
    Today @ 12:04 AM
    Location
    Centurion RSA
    Age
    73
    Posts
    1,392
    Real Name
    Daan Kemp
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    09:25 AM
    Keep in mind the 303 was developed before 1900 and slowly evolved subsequently. Almost unchanged since about 1914 I believe.

    The 308/7,62 is a shortened 30-06 known in the USAicon as a 'wildcat' long before introduction as the 'new' military cartridge. Thus in theory a more 'efficient' cartridge but still developed within the constraints of ages old military shooting thinking. Actually broadly similar ballistics to most military cartridges in use in the preceding about 50 years.

    Generalising, pressures, etc, would be similar for most of the WWI an WWII cartridges still in use today in rifles produced in huge quantities 70 and more years ago.

  13. #10
    Legacy Member Wineman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last On
    03-10-2024 @ 03:10 PM
    Location
    Lodi California
    Posts
    273
    Real Name
    David Crippen
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    12:25 AM
    Not sure about the status of the 7.62x51 NATO as a "Wildcat" of the 30-06. Savage arms had a cartridge known as the 300 Savage in the 1920's that was supposed to duplicate 30-06 ballistics in a short action (99 lever action) rifle. It did so with 150 grain bullets. It is almost a clone of the 7.62x51 with the neck being slightly shorter. Winchester used it as a basis for the T65 round and then introduced the T65 as the 308 Winchester prior to the adoption of the 7.62x51 as the NATO standard round sometime around 1951. It was the advent of Ball powders that allowed smaller cases to duplicate the ballistics of larger cases. Anything the 7.62x51 can do, the 30-06 can do it better and faster. The downside is the less than 100% case fill with certain powders (medium burn rate like IMR 4895) and the long case. You can load the 30-06 up with slower powder but all the ammo produced by military arsenals around the world needed to consider the M1icon Garand and stuck to 48-50 +/- grains of medium burn powder.

    Dave

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Little Hand Loading System For Carcano 6,5x62
    By Ovidio in forum Ammunition and Reloading for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 08-05-2017, 05:07 PM
  2. Loading for the MLE action
    By desky85 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-17-2017, 04:23 PM
  3. loading flintlocks
    By rice 123 in forum Black Powder
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-21-2016, 12:39 PM
  4. Hand loading for the 6.5*52
    By Norway_Krag in forum Italian Rifles
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-29-2015, 02:54 AM
  5. 14-314a Garand Picture of the Day - hand-to-hand combat demonstration,
    By Mark in Rochester in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Picture of the Day Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-13-2014, 08:54 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks