+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Mk1 Leaf Sights for No. 4 Mk 1's... "Singers"???

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member Rick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    @
    Posts
    55
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    03:05 AM

    Mk1 Leaf Sights for No. 4 Mk 1's... "Singers"???

    Curious about these sights as I don't have one - my Long Branch came with a CMk3.

    I assume "Singer" refers to Singer the company as a maker of these sights. I also assume that numerous companies other than Singer also supplied these sights.

    1. Why is this variant of the leaf sights generically (it seems to me) referred to as "Singer sights"? Because Singer made the majority of them? Something like that?

    2. As a click adjustable military sight for the No. 4, what distance does one click subtend at 100 yards? I suspect it won't be anything close to an inch (1.047") or a half of an inch.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 12:49 PM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,526
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    09:05 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Rick View Post
    Curious about these sights as I don't have one - my Long Branch came with a CMk3.

    I assume "Singer" refers to Singer the company as a maker of these sights. I also assume that numerous companies other than Singer also supplied these sights.

    1. Why is this variant of the leaf sights generically (it seems to me) referred to as "Singer sights"? Because Singer made the majority of them? Something like that?

    2. As a click adjustable military sight for the No. 4, what distance does one click subtend at 100 yards? I suspect it won't be anything close to an inch (1.047") or a half of an inch.
    Why are all vacuums called 'Hoovers" ?

    No4 sights mounted on a No4 are ~1MOA
    Put the No4 sight on a No5 and it gives ~0.5MOA

    You may find this old post by Parashooter interesting (comparing the 'Singer' No4 sight with the Singer No5 sight) I have fitted No5 sights to my No4 and the differnece is outstanding.




    Parashooter – No4 Vs No5 Rear sight Threads

    At least on these two examples (original sights), there appears to be a difference in screw diameter and pitch. Given the slightly coarser thread on the 800-yard sight, the "click value" would be some 10% greater than the 1300-yard sight if both were mounted on rifles with the same sight radius - except for the fact that the 1300-yard elevation screw is double-threaded, giving it an effective pitch approximately double that of the single-thread 800-yard screw.

    On measuring the two sights shown, each click of the No.4's sight moves the slide .008" - vs. .0043" on the No.5's sight. Consequently, the 1300-yard sight gives very close to 1.0 MOA per click with the No.4 rifle's 28" sight radius while the 800-yard sight has a click value of ~0.66 MOA with the No.5's 23" sight radius and would yield ~0.55 MOA on a No.4 rifle.
    Last edited by Alan de Enfield; 12-31-2020 at 04:59 AM.
    Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...

  4. The Following 5 Members Say Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:


  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #3
    Contributing Member CINDERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last On
    03-25-2024 @ 11:01 AM
    Location
    South West Western Australia
    Posts
    7,734
    Real Name
    CINDERS
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    05:05 PM
    Would the shorter brl on the No.5 account for a different trajectory of MkVII ball hence a coarser thread as it is only graduated to 800Yds probably what the builders envisaged as a long shot in the jungle. After watching a reasonable amount of N.G footage with our troops in the jungle a 20 yard shot would be a long one! Guess that goes for most jungle situations.
    My nephew did a 12 month tour with the AFP to the Solomons where his gig was a chopper ride into the middle of the jungle alone to a 1 room shack and a beat of a few villages he said without a guide he would have been lost as he said you go off the track 2-3M and you cannot see which way is the track so dense is the shrubbery.
    He also said there is enough UXB's there to keep the ordnence disposal teams there going for the next 100 years such is the detritous of WWII.

  7. #4
    Legacy Member Rick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    @
    Posts
    55
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    03:05 AM
    Thread Starter
    Thank you Alan. Although, at least on this side of the pond in North America, I haven't heard vacuum cleaners generically referred to as "Hoovers". And now that I think of it, vacuum cleaner salesman jokes disappeared sometime in the last 30 years. I'm old enough to remember them actually coming to the door - what a dismal way to attempt to make a living.

    I can see the point of preferring the No. 5's leaf sight when it delivers ~ half MOA corrections versus one MOA corrections. I don't think there's too much of a percentage of Lee Enfield shooters today that are going to be shooting beyond 800 yards with one of the issue sights.

    I will file that info away and see about finding a No. 4 rear sight at one of the gun shows. I'll stick with the PH4 I have mounted now, but if for some reason I need something different, the No. 5's leaf sight looks far more appealing to me for target use versus the CMk3 leaf sight that came on the rifle.
    Last edited by Rick; 12-31-2020 at 10:50 AM.

  8. #5
    Legacy Member Rick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    @
    Posts
    55
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    03:05 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by CINDERS View Post
    After watching a reasonable amount of N.G footage with our troops in the jungle a 20 yard shot would be a long one! Guess that goes for most jungle situations.
    I wonder how many troops familiar with shotguns back then thought the poor bugger walking point should have actually been armed with a pump shotgun and buckshot at those ranges?

    Reading of the exploits of some of the units fighting in the jungles of the Pacific War back then, the idea of just striking off into dense jungle on a fighting patrol, heading in the general direction of where you think the enemy will be, is a pretty high level of ballsy. Not going to be any indirect fire support, air support, etc if you bite off more than you can chew. And a fighting withdrawal in that same dense jungle... especially if you have wounded? Good luck with that.

  9. Thank You to Rick For This Useful Post:


  10. #6
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 10:05 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,836
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    02:05 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Rick View Post
    I will file that info away and see about finding a No. 4 rear sight at one of the gun shows.
    I see you're in Vancouver, I'm in Victoria...if you want an English made sight I'll send you one because I have a couple. Fazerklay I think like the one on the left in the pics. No cost, just to get rid of it. The #5 sight isn't right for the #4 and it would cost lots...around here.
    Regards, Jim

  11. #7
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 12:49 PM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,526
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    09:05 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by browningautorifleicon View Post
    I see you're in Vancouver, I'm in Victoria...if you want an English made sight I'll send you one because I have a couple. Fazerklay I think like the one on the left in the pics. No cost, just to get rid of it. The #5 sight isn't right for the #4 and it would cost lots...around here.

    As a collector I'd agree - the No5 sight isn't 'right' for a No4.
    As a shooter I need all the help I can get and the No5 sight is a help.

    I have kept the original (to the rifle) No4 sight in a baggie, marked up as to which rifle it belongs.

    I currently have a PH5C on my savage No4 Mk1* (4th from the top)


    Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...

  12. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:


  13. #8
    Advisory Panel Parashooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 02:24 AM
    Location
    Connecticut
    Age
    79
    Posts
    677
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    05:05 AM
    Originally Posted by CINDERS
    Would the shorter brl on the No.5 account for a different trajectory of MkVII ball hence a coarser thread as it is only graduated to 800Yds probably what the builders envisaged as a long shot in the jungle. After watching a reasonable amount of N.G footage with our troops in the jungle a 20 yard shot would be a long one! Guess that goes for most jungle situations.
    1. The No.5's sight actually has a finer pitch* than the No.4's. Looks coarser because it's a single thread while the No.4's is a double thread.
    2. Despite the unfortunate "Jungle Carbine" marketing term, it's worthwhile recognizing that the No.5 was designed and used as a general-purpose rifle for all kinds of terrain. Wartime experience had demonstrated that rifle fire was largely ineffective beyond 800 yards - so why bother with extraneous graduations?

    *Wikipedia's "Screw thread" article has some useful clarification on "pitch" -


    "Lead /ˈliːd/ and pitch are closely related concepts. They can be confused because they are the same for most screws. Lead is the distance along the screw's axis that is covered by one complete rotation of the screw (360°). Pitch is the distance from the crest of one thread to the next. Because the vast majority of screw threadforms are single-start threadforms, their lead and pitch are the same. Single-start means that there is only one "ridge" wrapped around the cylinder of the screw's body. Each time that the screw's body rotates one turn (360°), it has advanced axially by the width of one ridge. "Double-start" means that there are two "ridges" wrapped around the cylinder of the screw's body. Each time that the screw's body rotates one turn (360°), it has advanced axially by the width of two ridges. . ."
    Last edited by Parashooter; 12-31-2020 at 02:10 PM.

  14. The Following 5 Members Say Thank You to Parashooter For This Useful Post:


  15. #9
    Contributing Member Seaforth72's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last On
    03-26-2024 @ 03:01 AM
    Location
    Richmond, British Columbia, CANADA
    Posts
    366
    Real Name
    Colin MacGregor Stevens, CD
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    02:05 AM
    The original question # 1 at the start of this thread was “ Why is this variant of the leaf sights generically (it seems to me) referred to as "Singer sights"? Because Singer made the majority of them? Something like that?”

    I believe that “Singer sights” is an erroneous term, used by collectors and shooters for the Mark I backsight. Singer was simply one of several manufacturers and was not even the first to make these. The Mark I backsights were first made by Royal Small Arms Factory Enfield in a couple of variations in the early 1930s for the Trials No.4 Mk.I rifles. Then in 1941-1942 they were made by Singer, BSA, Stevens-Savage, Small Arms Limited at Long Branch etc. To speed up production in 1942-1945 the rifle manufacturers switched to simpler backsight designs, though the Mk.I Modified sight continued to be installed on No.4 Mk.I (T) and No. 4 Mk.I* (T) sniper rifles and the unfinished examples, the No.4 Mk. I (T. LESS TELESCOPE). Post-WWII the Mk.I backsight came back into common use as the wartime rush to produce rifles had passed, and precision in shooting was desired. Oddly however Canadaicon produced the C No.4 Mk. I* in 1949-1950 and spare bodies thereafter briefly, fitted with stamped metal backsights.
    Last edited by Seaforth72; 01-01-2021 at 01:51 AM.

  16. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Seaforth72 For This Useful Post:


  17. #10
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    4,651
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    02:05 AM
    Peter wrote a brief monograph on the No.1 Mk.VI / No.4 Mk.I trials backsight in 1990 of which I have a copy, pointing out that "Whether by accident or good design, this configuration ALMOST equates to minutes of angle, certainly at the mid-ranges..." He also pointed out that the earlier trials sights had four rather than six indents/clicks per revolution.
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

  18. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Surpmil For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. SAVAGE "S" in details, "ILCO butt trap", "P" on bayonet stud,what co. was ILCO?
    By Garandrew in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-15-2010, 07:48 PM
  2. "filed" Swedish diopter sights
    By Calfed in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-28-2009, 07:24 PM
  3. Hello...My Names is "Sights"
    By Sights in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 07-10-2009, 03:06 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks