+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: No. 4 "Singer" sights revisited

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Advisory Panel Lance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 05:29 AM
    Location
    New England, USA
    Posts
    660
    Real Name
    Lance
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:22 AM

    No. 4 "Singer" sights revisited

    Late X-mas present arrived via snail mail today. Took only one month to get to half way across the country as a first class package.

    With the recent discussion on the Singer style rear sight this is the first 1942 dated milled sight I have come across. A bonus is that the battle sight is still intact. (Sorry for making you dig out your girls to look)

    Anyways, obviously with the need for rifles in 1941 the complex singer sight was shelved for the "L" flip sight and later the stamped sights. Singer was the only one to produce these milled sights during WWII, most with 1941 dates or N67 marked leafs, with a bulk of them ear-marked to Enfield and H&H for the sniper project.

    Many SM41's ended up modified for the sniper program and later, from observation, another run of sights in 1943 was done for the sniper program (SM43 as I have never seen one with the battle sight intact). Most likely in mid to late 1943 Singer started to use N67.

    This 1942 dated example is "S.M.41" dated on the wheel and "SM42" on the leaf. Unfortunately there is not enough data to know if it is a early 1942 or a late 1942 (when they restarted the manufacture).

    Pictured are SM41, SM42, SM43 and N67 milled sights (small hole battle sight aperture) and SM41, SM42 (low on back of 600 blade), SM42 (high on front of 600 blade) and N67 flip sight. Embarrassed I do not have a SM43 flip sight (another quest), sorry.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Lance For This Useful Post:


  3. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  4. #2
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    03-20-2024 @ 06:05 AM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,429
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    08:22 AM
    Nice montage of Singer made variants Lance, although I think they (Singer) weren't the sole producer of these sights during WW2. Having said that, if Singer production of Mk1 sights was intermittent at the height of the war perhaps that is why the batch of Mk1 rear sights provided to H&H in 1943 & not uncommonly seen on BSA 43 4T's were of Savage manufacture? If Singer were in between batches it would be feasible that the sights H&H needed would have to be sourced elsewhere.

  5. Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:


  6. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  7. #3
    Legacy Member Alan de Enfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 12:49 PM
    Location
    Y Felinheli, Gogledd Cymru
    Posts
    2,526
    Real Name
    Alan De Enfield
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    08:22 AM
    RoF Poole also manufactured the Mk1 sights (Marked P), as did POFicon (marked - I think - with a P in a circle), as did BSA, and of course Savage & Fazakerley
    Last edited by Alan de Enfield; 01-08-2021 at 05:24 PM.
    Mine are not the best, but they are not too bad. I can think of lots of Enfields I'd rather have but instead of constantly striving for more, sometimes it's good to be satisfied with what one has...

  8. Thank You to Alan de Enfield For This Useful Post:


  9. #4
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    03-20-2024 @ 06:05 AM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,429
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    08:22 AM
    I think the P in a circle may be the ROF Poole variants Alan, although I'm not certain of this. Again, not certain, but have always assumed that these Poole made examples were post WW2 mfr. Long Branch also made some Mk1 rear sights during WW2. I've only ever seena handful of POFicon made No4's, but from what I recall of them the rear sights were unmarked, or at least the sight leaves were. However, they were all very nicely made.

  10. Thank You to Roger Payne For This Useful Post:


  11. #5
    Advisory Panel Lance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 05:29 AM
    Location
    New England, USA
    Posts
    660
    Real Name
    Lance
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:22 AM
    Thread Starter
    My bad guys. I should have worded it "only early UKicon maker" as BSA and Faz did not start until mid-late 1944 (best guess on No. 5 production). Received my second COVID vaccine yesterday and felt crappy last night with fatigue and a headache, my only excuse. Roger, I wonder if they requested rear sights from Savage, if they received spares along with rifles, or if they just robbed the rear sight off the early rifles?

  12. Thank You to Lance For This Useful Post:


  13. #6
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    03-20-2024 @ 06:05 AM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,429
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    08:22 AM
    Hi Lance. Hope you're feeling better today! I first came across 43 BSA T's with Savage rear sights when we bought the batch of 140 rifles, back in about 1997. IIRC there was a couple like that amongst them.Over the years I heard of or saw another two or three, & in all cases, as far as I could assess, the rifles were unadulterated in recent years, which led me to suspect that they may have been replacement sights supplied to H&H for otherwise satisfactory rifles that had been sent for conversion with the wrong pattern rear sight fitted. I never had a shred of documentary proof to back this up, but I am sure that a few years ago MkVII posted a thread in whcih he referred to finding a document in Ministry of Supply records (or somewhere such like) that confirmed a quantity of Savage made sights were to be provided to H&H for precisely this purpose. Somebody more skilled may be able to find the link, or maybe even MkVII may be able to chip in himself..........

  14. #7
    Legacy Member Mk VII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    03-20-2024 @ 07:30 PM
    Location
    England
    Age
    62
    Posts
    1,406
    Real Name
    James West
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    08:22 AM
    We had some discussion on this a few years back. https://www.milsurps.com/showthread....itish+archives

  15. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Mk VII For This Useful Post:


  16. #8
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    4,651
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    01:22 AM
    And from that interesting thread:

    Quote Originally Posted by Mk VII View Post
    I came across this recently, while searching for something quite different.


    On 25 Aug 1942 the War Office cabled the following to the Britishicon Army Staff in Washington DC:

    Are Rifles No. 4 now being manufactured in USAicon and Canadaicon being fitted with leaf back sights? If so possible requirement in UK for 7,000 in connection with manufacture of sniper's rifles.

    The reply on 31 Aug 1942

    First. Present USA and Cdn. rifles have Mark two (tip-up) backsight.

    Second. Savage has approx. 6000 assembled Mark one leaf backsights.

    Third. Might obtain these provided decision cabled immediately.


    A minute dated 2nd Sept asks:

    S.S.9 (through A.L.M.)

    We urgently require 7,000 leaf backsights to complete fitment of No.4 Telescopic Rifles awaiting urgent issue to troops.
    The cables at 1A and 1B [above] show 6,000 sight assembled to be available.
    Will you therefore please arrange that these sights are delivered by the quickest available route to Weedon.
    A draft cable is enclosed for despatch.

    (sd.) R.H. Salmon
    W.S.14
    "quickest available route" would obviously be aircraft, and that would probably mean new-built bombers being ferried to the UK, as Warren has referred to previously in regard to shipment of Long Branch No.4(T)s. (the weight-fuel-range limitations would probably mean many small shipments)
    I wonder if any ferry pilots/crew are still around who might know something about this process?

    The requirement for 7,000 sights presumably correlates to the contracts being let for the No4(T), but H&H clearly didn't have capacity to use 7,000 sights any time soon. The inventory of sniping rifles in the UK taken in late 1943 suggests their production was about 50 rifles a week, until perhaps some time in mid to late 1944(?). When Peter visited their factory in north London in the late 1980s and spoke to the last staffer who was there during the war, he was shown the single milling machine which had been used to mill the pads after fitment, or the bodies before (I forget which), so about 50 rifles a week seems reasonable.

    The MkI sights are far less complex than a lot of what was being made for the war effort, so the lack of supply, and the speed of production of No4(T)s generally, certainly suggests a rather low production priority being assigned, and the same would be true for Long Branch and Research Enterprises Ltd., considering what else they were making.
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

  17. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Surpmil For This Useful Post:


  18. #9
    Advisory Panel
    Roger Payne's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Last On
    03-20-2024 @ 06:05 AM
    Location
    Sutton Coldfield, UK.
    Posts
    3,429
    Real Name
    Roger Payne
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    08:22 AM
    Interesting points, & although it was stated that 7,000 were required, that 6,000 were available, & that this 6,000 were to be appropriated asap for the 4T conversion programme, I have no doubt that only a small number of these, assuming all 6,000 got to the UKicon, were ever used on 4T's. If all 6,000 of the sights had been used that would mean that around 25% of 4T's would have left H&H bearing a Savage rear sight. Clearly not the case................but some most definitely did.

  19. #10
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    4,651
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    01:22 AM
    That is also an interesting point, as is the question of where the SM41 and 42 sights were going in 1941 and 42!?

    Clearly they were being fitted to rifles, and not reserved for No4(T)s, or even TR - graded rifles (which would have been a logical course of action if there were enough for both purposes)

    The conversion of the trials No4s was presumably coming to an end or had ended not long before this request went out, and they of course all had the MkI backsights fitted. So, a sudden realization on the part of the small arms people at the MoD that they needed more No4s for conversion, but the current production rifles didn't have the MkI backsight, and hence the urgent scrabble to find some anywhere?

    Perhaps we have in this an explanation of why Savage rifles are found among the No4(T)s: they were in the UKicon, possibly in store, and presumably already fitted with Mk.I backsights?

    If Savage had 6000 MkI backsights on hand, they either were producing much more than they needed for No.4 production, or perhaps more likely, had ceased to fit them to rifles when the two position peep sight change was ordered?

    But if such sights were around to be fitted to Long Branch No4(T)s in 1943/44, Savage either continued to make them, or didn't send all 6000 to the UK in late 1942?
    Last edited by Surpmil; 01-10-2021 at 08:01 PM. Reason: Typos
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

  20. Thank You to Surpmil For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Mk1 Leaf Sights for No. 4 Mk 1's... "Singers"???
    By Rick in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-01-2021, 02:06 AM
  2. "filed" Swedish diopter sights
    By Calfed in forum Mauser Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-28-2009, 07:24 PM
  3. 1943 Underwood "Singer" carbine question??
    By nhetzer in forum M1/M2 Carbine
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-06-2009, 10:35 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks