+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 45

Thread: Need help with semi auto L4A4

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member SleepyDoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Last On
    01-25-2024 @ 11:55 PM
    Location
    Des Moines, IA
    Posts
    16
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    12:31 AM

    Need help with semi auto L4A4

    Greetings to you all.
    I have contacted some of you privately trying to gather some of your expert opinion and unfortunately I am still looking for answers. I have an L4A4 bren which since acquiring it has had case head separations. It is a Historic Arms build which I have returned to them and they had it running on Radway Green ammunition. I have been unable to get more than 5 rounds down the pipe before having case head separation or other case ruptures causing a jamming issue. I have tried to headspace the gun to the best of my ability and it will close on a go and no go 308 (to be expected), but will not close on the 7.62x51 max case length gauge. I looked through the instructions that Sarco supplies with their new production barrels to check if the fit is correct and everything seems to be in order regarding correct spacing/gaps and lock up etc.
    I have tried surplus remington from the 60/70s, 70s lake city, new production lake city from 2020, reloads, and all have had issues.
    The gun will not cycle on gas setting two and will sometimes crack cases, but usually not have a separation. On 3 the gun will cycle, but almost guaranteed it will have a case head separation.
    More information, the components are mostly enfield original parts. The barrel is enfield as well as the bolt and carrier if I remember correctly. I don't recall the receiver, but I don't think that matters for this.
    A weird not is when doing a chamber casting following
    Since the gun headspaced correctly I am starting to wonder if the gas system or extraction process is somehow causing a violent extraction.
    If anyone has any information or ideas that could help I would greatly appreciate it. I scanned the forums back through 2015 without much luck.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Legacy Member WallyG.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Last On
    05-22-2022 @ 11:10 AM
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Age
    62
    Posts
    126
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    12:31 AM
    I am going to suppose that the case separations are being caused by too much friction between the ejecting case and the barrel chamber.

    Have you confirmed that the barrel chamber is within service specifications? Bore erosion at the throat might have widened the bore and the expanding case lip might be deforming when fired to a condition where it's front is wider than its rear - causing too much extraction drag/friction and the resulting neck separation.

    I have over the years obtained several .303 surplus barrels her in the US that look fine but are "shot out" and cause the same separations that you describe, Unfortunately finding a "replacement" .308 barrel will be a challenge. Is your barrel a true/original UKicon .308? Was the gun built specifically for it? Is the bolt an original UK .308 bolt? You would be wanting to try a new barrel to eliminate the variables that the current barrel might be introducing into the equation. If the barrel and bolt are original UK .308 then trying to test other calibers to eliminate possible component issues will be more of a challenge.

    As to gas settings... semi auto's as a general rule require more gas to cycle... compressing the additional striker spring(s) and cycling more steel (striker is a new addition to the internals that are reciprocating). Len typically enlarges the barrel's gas port and also drills out oversized the gas block and one of the adjustment settings in the gas nut. Can you confirm that this has been done? I would not expect the now semi auto gun to cycle completely on the 2nd gas port - especially if the components have not been drilled out oversized to deliver more gas to overcome the new springs and mass of the semi auto internals.

    What solution are you seeking?

    Unless there is something to be done to the parts that you have already, new components will need to be found and substituted and function tested to see if the flaw(s) can be identified and eliminated. Again, this will not be any easy path if your gun was built using original UK .308 parts. They are not easy to find in the US and when found are expensive.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Legacy Member Daan Kemp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Last On
    Today @ 12:04 AM
    Location
    Centurion RSA
    Age
    73
    Posts
    1,392
    Real Name
    Daan Kemp
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    07:31 AM
    Those cases look rough. The chamber might be causing them to stick.

  6. #4
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 12:35 AM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,813
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    03-18-2024
    Local Time
    10:31 PM
    A case separation isn't from excessive gas, it's from an oversize chamber. Excessive gas can rip off a rim however, stuck cases will rip off a rim... I doubt the manufacturer is starting with new barrels and just because they parkerize them and make them look new doesn't help. If your chamber is fat it can rupture too. I had lots of case separations over time with machine guns, all excess headspace issues.
    Regards, Jim

  7. #5
    Legacy Member TactAdv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Last On
    01-17-2024 @ 02:44 AM
    Location
    NE Colorado, USA
    Posts
    236
    Real Name
    Thomas T. Hoel
    Local Date
    03-18-2024
    Local Time
    10:31 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by browningautorifleicon View Post
    ......just because they parkerize them and make them look new doesn't help.
    Yes. Listen to THIS.

    “Parkerizing” is nothing more than phosphoric acid etching of the metal surface. As it is intended to do it causes microscopic pitting of the smooth surface. Among other things, this in effect causes the surface to become rough and porous, obviously no longer smooth much less polished.

    Parkerizing a barrel chamber is -ALWAYS- a very bad idea!!!

    Fortunately, it is largely reversible and easily fixed by liberal applications of something like FLITZ metal polishing paste, applied by fully coating a rotary mop (I use a cotton shotgun chamber cleaning mop, appropriately sized to the chamber you are working.) and placing the shaft of the mop on an appropriate extension and powering it with a portable hand drill, Dremel tool, etc. Use medium speed and make sure the FLITZ paste never dries out while turning.

    Go CAREFULLY.....you can EASILY remove a .001” of metal quickly!! All you want to accomplish is to polish out the microscopic porosity left from the Parkerizing. It does not take much time to do this.

    Once you have removed the porosity and restored a smoothed, polished finish you will likely find your case sticking issues are resolved.

    You WILL discover you have increased the overall chamber bore dimensionally a very slight amount which SHOULD not be a problem.

    Also.....all this being said above....you did not mention whether or not your .308/7.62 barrel is original military (guaranteed chambered correctly originally), or a new-made aftermarket tube.....where no explicit chambering dimensions are necessarily guaranteed. If new-made I sound almost CERTAINLY expect it to have been cut to SAAMI-spec .308Win chamber dimensions, and NOT to military-spec 7.62x51NATO dimensions, which would easily be a problem as you describe if it was SAAMI cut to minimum chamber dimensions which are ALWAYS intended for bolt-action rifles for maximum accuracy.

    If you have a new-made tube, and you’ve tried the after-Parkerizing Polish to no avail, locate a COMPETENT person who can re-cut the chamber using a proper 7.62NATO reamer.
    -TomH

  8. #6
    Legacy Member SleepyDoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Last On
    01-25-2024 @ 11:55 PM
    Location
    Des Moines, IA
    Posts
    16
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    12:31 AM
    Thread Starter
    Sorry for the delay. Very busy. I appreciate all the help and will try to get back to your help as soon as possible.

    As far as I am aware it is all original military. Barrel is marked Enfield. All bolt parts and carrier appear to be Enfield as well. It was originally a converted Mk2 by the UKicon military to an L4 when they were switching over to 7,62x51. After it was cut upon entry into this country it was rewelded by Historic arms. I do not see any aftermarket parts other than the SA conversion parts. I do not have throat erosion gauges to measure and do not know how to measure the rest of the chamber. I gave it my best to headspace the gun with the gauges I have and it seems OK, but I'm sure there are other variables to check as well. Closes completely on 308 go and no go, but will not close on 7.62x51 max gauge.
    I assume the gas ports have been reamed per Len's MO and the gun will not work on setting 2, but will on setting 3. This corroborates that thought as well.
    When I sent the gun back to HA for a look over I think he polished the chamber, but I cannot recall. I do see the rings on the shoulder of the cases which is odd, but I can't imagine this is causing enough sticking. Len had said that he had it running like a sewing machine on Radway Green ammunition (can't find any), but everything else I have tried thus far has not worked. I have not tried steel cased (don't want to), still need to try PRVI x51 and many other European surplus rounds to see if they will work. Too bad everything is out of stock and costs an arm and a leg. Lake city 2020 and other US surplus from the 60s and 70s hasn't worked, nor have my reloads. All rupture.
    I have been waiting for SARCO to get their barrels back in and I will buy one of their parts kits with it to get extra parts to try.
    As far as quick things to check that will not cause much damage and then working up to potentially destroying parts to fix the issue, what are my first options to check out what could be the problem? I could try polishing the chamber, but if anyone has a way to measure the chamber first to see if there is in fact an issue first, I would greatly appreciate hearing how that is done. The cerrosafe I have expands too much and I was told it is not a good surrogate.
    Any input on first steps for checking or fixes would be appreciated. I'm leaning toward trying to polish the chamber first, but I would like to hear everyone's opinion on what would mess up the gun least first. Am I understanding correctly that the South African barrels will not work in the L4? Those are the only ones I can find readily available. Everything else will be aftermarket SARCO barrel.

    What solution are you seeking? - A working firearm that will not have case ruptures.

    Thank you all again for help in this matter. I have been hitting my head against a wall trying to figure out what to do.

  9. #7
    Legacy Member tr63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Last On
    02-05-2022 @ 08:25 AM
    Location
    maine U.S.A.
    Posts
    404
    Real Name
    john senesy
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    01:31 AM
    It should not close on the .308 No go gauge !! Your head space is off !! Sarco .308 barrels are short chambered . Historic Arms rewelded the receiver and did not allow for normal bolt and locking shoulder set back and that why you have incorrect long head space . There are many Historic Arms Bren's with all kinds of problems which head space is one . You need to change the the locking with a large/longer one to correct the head space so that the bolt will not close on the no go gauge and the cases should not separate.

  10. Thank You to tr63 For This Useful Post:


  11. #8
    Legacy Member SleepyDoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Last On
    01-25-2024 @ 11:55 PM
    Location
    Des Moines, IA
    Posts
    16
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    12:31 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by tr63 View Post
    It should not close on the .308 No go gauge !! Your head space is off !! Sarco .308 barrels are short chambered . Historic Arms rewelded the receiver and did not allow for normal bolt and locking shoulder set back and that why you have incorrect long head space . There are many Historic Arms Bren's with all kinds of problems which head space is one . You need to change the the locking with a large/longer one to correct the head space so that the bolt will not close on the no go gauge and the cases should not separate.
    It is NOT a sarco barrel. It is an original UKicon 7.62x51 which if I'm understanding correctly may still close on 308 no go without issue. It wont close on the 7.62x51 max gauge.

  12. #9
    Legacy Member tr63's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Last On
    02-05-2022 @ 08:25 AM
    Location
    maine U.S.A.
    Posts
    404
    Real Name
    john senesy
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    01:31 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by SleepyDoc View Post
    It is NOT a sarco barrel. It is an original UKicon 7.62x51 which if I'm understanding correctly may still close on 308 no go without issue. It wont close on the 7.62x51 max gauge.
    I understand it is not a SARCO barrel , Believe me it should not close on a .308 no-go gauge .

  13. #10
    Legacy Member ActionYobbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Last On
    02-23-2024 @ 01:28 PM
    Location
    Flippin Arky
    Posts
    417
    Local Date
    03-19-2024
    Local Time
    01:31 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by SleepyDoc View Post
    It is NOT a sarco barrel. It is an original UKicon 7.62x51 which if I'm understanding correctly may still close on 308 no go without issue. It wont close on the 7.62x51 max gauge.
    Thats a sarco barrel. They copied the profile from the South Afrcan barrels which is different from the English barrels. Also who ever populated that barrel cut the lugs of the sight base instead of milling the slots in the barrel because thats easier to do than a bit of milling (lazy lazy lazy)
    I am telling you straight that that is a sarco barrel (American made replacement) but you can have what ever fantasy you want.
    BTW that gun was never a Mk2 as you said but it was a Mk3.
    1ATSR 177AD & 4/3 RNSWR

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Auto Ordnance Thompson Semi-Auto 45
    By Aragorn243 in forum Other U.S. Service Rifles
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 01-18-2016, 01:13 PM
  2. Semi Auto .303
    By RJW NZ in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 29
    Last Post: 12-01-2013, 07:40 PM
  3. Why did the USA go semi-auto when others did not?
    By Amsdorf in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 11-24-2011, 06:49 PM
  4. Semi-auto M14?
    By Stevo in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 06-19-2011, 03:11 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks