+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: Ross M10 markings

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member Terdfergus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Last On
    06-18-2022 @ 09:43 PM
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    Posts
    12
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    02:01 AM

    Ross M10 markings

    Hello everyone,

    After coveting one for some time, I finally got my hands on a beautiful Ross mk.3. Although its sporterized, the barrel length and sights are unmolested and it seems like a good candidate for desporterization . Unfortunately, the stock has no markings, its either aftermarket or they have been sanded off, so I was hoping some the experts here could help get a glimpse of some of this rifle's history based on the stamps on the barrel and receiver, the only markings I could locate on the gun. Thanks in advance for any help!
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 12:49 AM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,839
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    01:01 AM
    I don't think there have been any replacement stocks until very recently. We do have a forum member that reproduces them and another that can make certain hardware... The marks are just Dominion of Canadaicon marks and nitro proofs... The stock marks were the story.
    Regards, Jim

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Legacy Member Terdfergus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Last On
    06-18-2022 @ 09:43 PM
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    Posts
    12
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    02:01 AM
    Thread Starter
    Yeah, it's a damn shame somebody felt the need to sand the stock like that, especially since there is no way of knowing the rifle's serial number now. I've read that taking a black light to it could help to make out markings that were sanded away, I may try that but I doubt it will help, the wood is smooth as a baby's bottom. I've done some reading on the BM proof mark, and from my understanding it along with the .303 nitro proof stamp indicates that the rifle was proofed in Englandicon sometime between 1925-54 either before being sold off or reissued for home guard use. The E stamp seems to indicate that the chamber was widened to handle British ammunition better, which if I understand correctly was generally done at field workshops in England. So, would it be a fair assumption that the rifle at least made it overseas one way or another?

  6. #4
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    4,651
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    01:01 AM
    Hopefully the bore is in as good condition as the exterior?

    Your bolt may be a substitution as the finish does not at all match that of the barrel and receiver.

    I wouldn't worry about it though; Ross apparently believed his bolts were interchangeable as they were rarely serial numbered to the receiver.

    Just ensure correct bolt assembly and fire 'at arms length' from a rest the first few times if you have any concerns.
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

  7. #5
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 12:49 AM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,839
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    01:01 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Terdfergus View Post
    So, would it be a fair assumption that the rifle at least made it overseas one way or another?
    It probably did go over but could have been withdrawn before they left Salisbury. Then they did all kinds of service after the fact. We just had a US collector showing his off with all it's US markings...
    Regards, Jim

  8. #6
    Legacy Member Terdfergus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Last On
    06-18-2022 @ 09:43 PM
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    Posts
    12
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    02:01 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Surpmil View Post
    Hopefully the bore is in as good condition as the exterior?

    Your bolt may be a substitution as the finish does not at all match that of the barrel and receiver.

    I wouldn't worry about it though; Ross apparently believed his bolts were interchangeable as they were rarely serial numbered to the receiver.

    Just ensure correct bolt assembly and fire 'at arms length' from a rest the first few times if you have any concerns.
    The bore is in great shape, the bolt has the safety rivet installed and shows the correct full inch of exposed bolt sleeve when open, and closes and locks correctly so I have no concerns at all about safely firing it. My only concern is that the action is a bit stiff when pulling back from the locked position when the firing pin isn't cocked, maybe from being non-matching as you mentioned, but I suspect a good cleaning and oiling will help remedy that somewhat.

    Quote Originally Posted by browningautorifleicon View Post
    It probably did go over but could have been withdrawn before they left Salisbury.
    I suspect that was likely the case given the metal is in as good a shape as it is, probably sat in storage for a while before being sold into the civilian market.

  9. #7
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    4,651
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    01:01 AM
    Try black light on the stock in a darkened room. You may be able to read the marks despite the sanding.
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

  10. #8
    Legacy Member Terdfergus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Last On
    06-18-2022 @ 09:43 PM
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    Posts
    12
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    02:01 AM
    Thread Starter
    I did try using a black light on the stock, no dice. All I could make out was a very faint outline of the cartouche, bubba did a very thorough job of it. As far as safety goes, the bore looks great, the bolt has the rivet installed, shows the correct full inch of exposed sleeve when open, and closes and locks correctly, so I have no concerns at all about safely firing it. My only concern is that the action is a bit stiff when pulling back from the locked position, could be as you mentioned because the bolt is mismatched. I suspect a good cleaning and oiling will help remedy that.

  11. #9
    Contributing Member boltaction's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last On
    10-02-2023 @ 12:21 PM
    Location
    BC Interior
    Posts
    642
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    01:01 AM
    It definitely did spend time overseas as the Crown BM proof mark is a Birmingham one, and the .303 Nitro Proof mark is also Britishicon. You say the bolt is mismatched--they were never numbered, except sometimes by the British if issued to the Royal Marines. What is stamped on the bolt? As for the bolt finish, looks about right to me for a well used gun. The original bolts were case coloured but that often was worn off by cleaning over the years.

    Ed

  12. #10
    Legacy Member Terdfergus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2021
    Last On
    06-18-2022 @ 09:43 PM
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    Posts
    12
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    02:01 AM
    Thread Starter
    https://i.imgur.com/ORabqIj.jpg
    https://i.imgur.com/Tdjw2kJ.jpg
    https://i.imgur.com/aCZqDag.jpg
    https://i.imgur.com/OMm2wSM.jpg
    https://i.imgur.com/1S7KlqX.jpg

    Here are some images of various stamps on the bolt. Looks to me like the top of the sleeve maybe has a 9 and a 0 showing while the bottom says "AX31" (the 1 looks like it could also be a Greek letter or something like that) along with a lower case a or u. back of the magazine cutoff looks like it has a "Y" stamped on it, bolt handle has an inspectors mark along with and "X". No idea if any of that means anything or it's just standard inspection/ manufacturing marks.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Help Reading Ross Mark II Stock Markings?
    By mtb1098 in forum The Ross Rifle Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-16-2015, 07:02 PM
  2. New 1905 Ross, markings question
    By Homer2 in forum The Ross Rifle Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-23-2012, 09:08 AM
  3. Ross M1910 markings
    By Promo in forum The Ross Rifle Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 09-05-2011, 09:34 PM
  4. Ross PLY markings
    By buffdog in forum The Ross Rifle Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-09-2010, 02:08 PM
  5. Help with Ross MK II Unit Markings
    By Arisaka99 in forum The Ross Rifle Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-22-2009, 09:22 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks