+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: M1 Garand Lower Band Pin Question(s)

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member Ms15710's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Last On
    03-24-2024 @ 08:30 PM
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    57
    Real Name
    Michael Spears
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    07:27 AM

    M1 Garand Lower Band Pin Question(s)

    Hi all,

    I apologize for the slight influx of threads I've been creating ever since I've joined the forum, it is all just to gain more insight into the M1icon Garand as I delve more into collecting.

    I see that on many auctions for these rifles, they make a noticeable claim to the pin still being in place on the lower band. What exactly are the implications of this? Does this simply mean that it was never disassembled (the barrel + front handguard section) of the rifle? Is it a negative connotation if it missing?

    Furthermore, when and where would the lower band pin be removed if this was the case?

    Apologies if there are any misused terms.

    Thank you!
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    02:27 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Ms15710 View Post
    I see that on many auctions for these rifles, they make a noticeable claim to the pin still being in place on the lower band.
    So what? Why shouldn't it be in place? After all, one can readily dismantle the whole assembly and replace it.

    The fact that a pin is still there proves nothing, other than the simple fact that a pin is still there!
    Last edited by Patrick Chadwick; 01-18-2022 at 04:53 AM.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    02:27 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by Ms15710 View Post
    Does this simply mean that it was never disassembled (the barrel + front handguard section) of the rifle?
    That is what they want you to think - without actually making a claim that might be disproved later!

  6. #4
    Contributing Member Bob Seijas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 09:48 PM
    Location
    Montville, NJ and Delray Beach, FL
    Posts
    2,212
    Real Name
    Bob Seijas
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    08:27 AM

    Lower Band

    The issue is not whether the pin is in place, it's whether it shows signs of having been removed or replaced. That is a strong sign of originality, you can't rebarrel a receiver without taking it off. The best telltale is undisturbed original staking.
    Real men measure once and cut.

  7. The Following 6 Members Say Thank You to Bob Seijas For This Useful Post:


  8. #5
    Legacy Member Ms15710's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Last On
    03-24-2024 @ 08:30 PM
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    57
    Real Name
    Michael Spears
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    07:27 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Seijasicon View Post
    The issue is not whether the pin is in place, it's whether it shows signs of having been removed or replaced. That is a strong sign of originality, you can't rebarrel a receiver without taking it off. The best telltale is undisturbed original staking.
    Attachment 123406
    Interesting, thank you!

    In this regard, if the pin is missing but there are no signs that it was removed, does this mean anything?

    Is it possible that they could just fall out on their own?

  9. #6
    Legacy Member Jersey Devil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Last On
    02-16-2022 @ 07:35 PM
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    11
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    07:27 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Ms15710 View Post
    Interesting, thank you!

    In this regard, if the pin is missing but there are no signs that it was removed, does this mean anything?

    Is it possible that they could just fall out on their own?
    It's unlikely that a lower band pin would fall out on its own because they were staked in place. As you can see in Mr. Seijasicon' photo above, there's a bit of metal that's disturbed on either side of the pin. That was done so as to prevent the pin from coming loose and falling out. I've never seen a truly original, unmolested example that didn't have the pin in place. I suppose anything is possible, but I'd be highly suspect of such an example that claims originality but has a missing lower band pin.
    Support the CMP and GCA!

  10. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Jersey Devil For This Useful Post:


  11. #7
    Legacy Member Ms15710's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2021
    Last On
    03-24-2024 @ 08:30 PM
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    57
    Real Name
    Michael Spears
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    07:27 AM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Jersey Devil View Post
    It's unlikely that a lower band pin would fall out on its own because they were staked in place. As you can see in Mr. Seijasicon' photo above, there's a bit of metal that's disturbed on either side of the pin. That was done so as to prevent the pin from coming loose and falling out. I've never seen a truly original, unmolested example that didn't have the pin in place. I suppose anything is possible, but I'd be highly suspect of such an example that claims originality but has a missing lower band pin.
    Thank you for the reply!

    I would assume as much that there’s no feasible way it would fall out on its own with indented metal to keep it in.

    Moreover, is it safe to assume that on these completely undisturbed rifles the staking is only on one side of the lower band? And evidence of disturbed metal on both sides is rather suspect?

    I am just on the lookout for an all original rifle, and am taking all of these details into consideration so I know exactly what to look for.

  12. #8
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    02:27 PM

    Sorry, not convinced by the photo

    Well Bob, maybe it’s just my eyeballs, but the “staked” region in that photo looks very untidy. The few examples I have of staking show one clean dimple from a punch. That area looks as if it had been struck at least twice - first at 8 o’clock and later at 9 o’clock. As it might appear if, for instance, the pin had been driven out, replaced, and then staked again.

    It is noticeable that the position of the head of the pin in that photo is rather deep. Which would happen if, just maybe, the pin was driven in flush on the other side.

    To form a clearer opinion, one would need to see a good close-up photo of the other side.
    Last edited by Patrick Chadwick; 01-19-2022 at 08:11 AM.

  13. #9
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 10:05 PM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,836
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    05:27 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Patrick Chadwick View Post
    but the “staked” region in that photo looks very untidy
    I had one of the LL rifles that still had it's solid pin and looked exactly like that. Looks like they used something with a chisel point. It's the "Solid pin" that matters too. They changed to roll pins about 1952(?) I think.
    Regards, Jim

  14. #10
    Advisory Panel Patrick Chadwick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-25-2023 @ 06:36 AM
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,032
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    02:27 PM
    I think it might be useful at this stage to consider the following:

    To claim that an object is “untouched” - whatever one takes that to mean - is an attempt at a negative proof. After all, the objects in question were all “touched” extensively - in manufacture and proofing. Apart from the extremely rare cases of rifles still sealed in a factory wrap, after distribution and unwrapping, rifles were handled, used, and maintained.

    It may be possible to demonstrate that a rifle has been altered from its “out of the wrap” configuration - a positive proof.
    But in the days of mass-produced components that do not require any individual fitting, it is hardly possible to prove that no components have ever been replaced - a negative proof.

    Nevertheless, since so many collectors often place such an astonishingly high value on this presumed “untouchedness”, it is not surprising that sellers will do their best to suggest it - although they cannot prove it.

    Recourse is thus taken to insinuation, conjecture, hypothesis - anything but a firm guarantee…

    Because that is impossible.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. M1 Garand Arched Lower Band & Narrow Gas Cylinder
    By Durango56 in forum WTS/WTB/WTT (Want to Sell, Buy or Trade) Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-21-2021, 10:02 AM
  2. I need a M38 lower band nut
    By jwh2 in forum Italian Rifles
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-10-2018, 03:01 PM
  3. Lee-Enfield No. 4 lower band installation problem & a tip for upper band.
    By Seaforth72 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-13-2015, 09:07 AM
  4. 03 Lower Band questions
    By P-07ShortLee in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-15-2011, 08:28 PM
  5. M1 Loose Lower Band
    By togor in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-30-2010, 09:56 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks