+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: U.S. Model 1842 Musket- used by both the North and South during the Civil War.

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member drm2m's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-05-2022 @ 11:44 AM
    Location
    Quebec
    Posts
    216
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    07:20 AM

    U.S. Model 1842 Musket- used by both the North and South during the Civil War.



    (Click on the bar to enlarge the images.)


    1843 is the earliest issue date for a Harpers Ferry manufactured U.S. Model 1842 musket.





    The 1845 barrel date is not unusual being mismatched with the lock plate dating of 1843.






    This gun with the 1843 lock dating and 1845 barrel dating falls within the Mexican War period as well as the Civil War period.

    The inspector's cartouche on the stock is faintly visible in the photo below.





    The following commentary is from Joe Bilby (columnist from The Civil War Times publication following my questions to him on March 13 2006.)


    Joe Bilby shown below.



    Joe is the author of many gun books and regimental history works from this period and was very helpful to me when I was debating purchasing this gun.


    Joe's comments.

    Widely used in the first two years of the war by both sides, and used by certain regiments, like those of the Irish Brigade and the 12th NJ, who preferred it, into late 1864. The 12th's Gettysburg monument is as much to the '42 as to the regiment. It is topped with a large sphere and three smaller ones, with the line "buck and ball."










    Bayonet and scabbard.
    The bayonet which is marked” U.S” over “C” over “17” on the blade flat is a U.S.iconBayonet Model 1835……. , it came in a Regulation Pattern of 1839 Scabbard. This scabbard was normally carried in a shoulder belt (baldric) as opposed to being carried on the belt with a frog. This is the correct bayonet for the U.S. Model 1842 Musket, with a correct early scabbard.












    Other Salient Facts;

    Between 1843 and 1855 a total of 275,000 of this model were manufactured by Springfield and Harpers Ferry Armories, of which 172,000 were turned out at Springfield alone. The bayonet utilized for this model musket was the Model 1842 socket bayonet, which was 20-1/2 inches long, with a 2-7/8 inch socket and an 18-inch triangular blade. The U.S. Model 1842 Musket was the first arm to be produced at both the Harpers Ferry and Springfield Armories on a completely interchangeable basis, and aside even from this significant fact, holds a prominent position in the development of U.S. military shoulder arms. This was the first regulation percussion arm produced in the national armories, and at the same time, the last of the .69 caliber smoothbores.

    .69 calibre round ball, or, “buck and ball” that was a .69 round ball with three rounds of buckshot.


    David
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to drm2m For This Useful Post:


  3. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  4. #2
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Teleoceras's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-04-2023 @ 11:01 PM
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    46
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    07:20 AM

    Post .69 Musket cartridge

    Drm2m:

    .69 calibre round ball, or, “buck and ball” that was a .69 round ball with three rounds of buckshot.
    Great article! I just need to make a minor correction. The cartridge used by the 1842 Musket consisted of a .65 round ball weighing 412grs. with .31 buckshot weighing 41grs.

    There were three cartridge types. The single large .65 ball was not used as often as the buckn'ball loads of one .65 ball with three .31 balls. There was also a guard duty cartridge that used twelve .31 balls turning the Musket into a shotgun.

    All of these loads was on top of a 110gr. powder charge.

    All of this data can be found in the excellent book United Statesicon Firearms: The First Century 1776-1875 by David F. Butler.

  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #3
    Legacy Member drm2m's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-05-2022 @ 11:44 AM
    Location
    Quebec
    Posts
    216
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    07:20 AM
    Thread Starter
    Teleoceras,

    Thanks for your interest in this thread.
    I guess we are using different reference books regarding the Model 1842 U.S. Percussion Musket.

    My references are Flaydermanns page 446, 5th Edition , and Robert M. Reilly, page 14 in his book United Statesicon Military Small Arms 1816-1865.

    I have never heard of a .65 caliber musket ball?

    David


    I just found this on the Internet.....Interesting,.....I did not know that!
    Thanks for the heads up.

    (The gun shown above is a .69 cal. smooth bore....1843 early vintage)


    The main drawback was that it had a smooth bore of .69 caliber.

    “RIFLED WEAPONS” required the ball to be threaded tightly down spiral grooves in a barrel so the bullet would come out spiralling like a football. This allowed only about one shot per minute which would be a liability during an enemy bayonet assault. To speed loading the Model 1842 was issued with a .65 caliber round ball.

    This allowed only about one shot per minute which would be a liability during an enemy bayonet assault. To speed loading the Model 1842 was issued with a .65 caliber round ball. This allowed the typical soldier to fire three shots in one minute, at a cost of accuracy. The Model 1842 did not have a rear site for aiming, it was a point and shoot weapon. In order to make the Model 1842 Musket work most effectively, soldiers were trained to fire in shoulder-to-shoulder volleys like a giant human shotgun. In order to make the weapon even more effectively, the U.S. Army typically issued what was called buck-and-ball cartridges.

    The buck-and-ball contained one .65 caliber round ball and three .31 caliber
    buckshot. The Model 1842 Musket was replaced by the Model 1842 Rifled Musket, using a new expanding bullet, in 1857.
    Last edited by drm2m; 04-06-2009 at 02:06 AM.

  7. #4
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    threepdr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-01-2015 @ 08:55 PM
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    49
    Real Name
    Mark Hubbs
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    05:20 AM
    The .65 caliber ball allowed the projectiles to be loaded while still enclosed in the cartridge paper. This took up some of the windage. As the musket became fouled with residue, the ball could be unwrapped completely and still allow easy loading.

    I've shot my Model 42 with both single ball and buk-n-ball. For some reason the .65 caliber ball becomes very eratic when pushed behind the three buckshot. There is much more chance of hitting a man sized target at 75 yards if there are no buck shot in the load.

    The rifled version of the Model 42 is a terror to shoot. The 750 grain lead minie ball has a serious kick to it.

  8. #5
    Legacy Member Embalmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    02-05-2024 @ 12:07 PM
    Location
    North Shore Mass
    Posts
    190
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    06:20 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by threepdr View Post
    The rifled version of the Model 42 is a terror to shoot. The 750 grain lead minie ball has a serious kick to it.
    x2. the .58 (.575) isnt too bad on the shoulder, and fire them often. Fired my friends 69 cal rifled "42", and was shocked that the recoil closely rivaled that of a 30-06 . mixed with slow load times, that wears on you quick lol

  9. #6
    Legacy Member drm2m's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-05-2022 @ 11:44 AM
    Location
    Quebec
    Posts
    216
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    07:20 AM
    Thread Starter
    Threepdr and Teleoceras,

    I have certainly learned more about "buck and ball" based on your comments.
    Thank you.

    I found these comments on the Internet.....I own Claud Fuller's book and have not looked at his findings in this regard.


    Claud E. Fuller, in his book The Rifled Musket (New York: Bonanza Books, 1958) shows tests of a rifled musket firing Minie balls, and a smoothbore musket firing round ball and buck and ball rounds at various ranges. At ranges of 200 yards (180 m) and under, the buck and ball from the smoothbore musket, while less accurate than the rifled musket, actually produces a greater number of hits due to the greater number of projectiles; 37 of 50 Minie balls, vs. 18 of 50 balls and 31 of 150 buckshot, for a total of 49 hits in 50 shots. Beyond this range, the buckshot will have lost sufficient energy to become ineffective due to its lower ballistic coefficient.


    The .69 cal. Minie ball top left corner and .69 caliber round ball top right corner of the photo below.

    I do not have an example of a buck and ball paper cartridge in my collection.

    I have .58 cal and .577 paper cartridges and that is it.

    David



  10. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to drm2m For This Useful Post:


  11. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Teleoceras's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    04-04-2023 @ 11:01 PM
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    46
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    07:20 AM

    Post Joe Bilby's book

    Drm2m:

    I also recommend Civil War Firearms by Joseph G. Bilby. It has a nice section on the smoothbores.

    I shoot smoothbores about 80% of the time and have developed a real preference for them. It is because of the variable loadings that you can do with those old warriors that makes me love'em so much.

    Also a Musket if shot with a tight ball and patch is pretty accurate out to 50 yards.

  12. #8
    Advisory Panel

    jmoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-09-2023 @ 04:20 AM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    7,066
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    07:20 AM
    Good reference thread!

    Will cross link it to an "in-process" photo breakdown thread and a range report. Click on the links below if you're interested:

    US Model of 1842 Musket (A Photo Study in Several Parts)

    New and Old: Knight's SR15-E3 IWS and U.S. Model of 1842

  13. #9
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    grandpabear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Last On
    08-04-2012 @ 07:35 PM
    Location
    Lehigh Acres, Florida
    Posts
    5
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    07:20 AM
    I was wondering if any of you could verify if the loading data (.650 dia ball, .31 dia buckshot) is the same as was used with the Model 1816 Muskets made at Harper's Ferry (probably have 1822 date stamp--an error on Pedersoli replicas).
    Thanks for the info, I have email authorized from members so I'll get your input, I guess.

    Art

  14. #10
    Advisory Panel

    jmoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    06-09-2023 @ 04:20 AM
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    7,066
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    07:20 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by grandpabear View Post
    I was wondering if any of you could verify if the loading data (.650 dia ball, .31 dia buckshot) is the same as was used with the Model 1816 Muskets made at Harper's Ferry (probably have 1822 date stamp--an error on Pedersoli replicas).
    Thanks for the info, I have email authorized from members so I'll get your input, I guess.

    Art
    I'd have to hazard a guess that a current load would be less than the original due to improved burn characteristics of black powder. This was even done during the 1800s as powder production processes improved. But I don't remember reading about any current "buck and ball" loads. I can look up what was used originally, but that might not be what you need!

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. US 1842 musket with 0.75 barrel!
    By punicwars in forum Black Powder
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 08-12-2009, 04:18 PM
  2. Matchlock\Flintlock Musket
    By Teleoceras in forum Black Powder
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-09-2009, 10:50 PM
  3. Two “distinctly different” U.S. Civil War bayonets.
    By drm2m in forum Edged Weapons Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-30-2009, 10:45 AM
  4. CMP south store vs. north store
    By steel in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-29-2009, 07:59 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks