+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: Enfield L1A1 on a Lithgow cut receiver??

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #11
    Legacy Member nzl1a1collector's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 02:26 AM
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    621
    Real Name
    Kevin
    Local Date
    03-29-2024
    Local Time
    07:27 AM
    This is an intriguing rifle.
    Ive never seen a serial number so high... well in fact two serial numbers so high (UE80 A200565 (Body) & UE83 A201447 (TMH))

    The Body is Australianicon, it doesn't have RIFLE, 7.62MM, so its not one of the normal 'Spare' Body's that were available.

    Its possible Lithgow supplied Blank body's and TMH to Enfield for their own small production run where they have put the Enfield markings on the Bodies as Lithgow did supply large quantities of parts to the MOD. Why I say that is the Body has a Concession marking C21676, probably indicating the Body doesn't match the standard Britishicon Body but is acceptable for service.

    Here are some things I notice about the rifle:-
    RIFLE 7.62M/M LIAI UE80 A200565
    C21676
    D80

    960-2302 D79 /|\ (Cocking Handle Slide)

    Tabs on the top cover are buggered…. RH side is missing, LH side is heavily cracked

    Gas Block is British

    Magazine is from an Indian 1A1 Rifle

    Incorrect front Sling Swivel… possible from a Lee Enfield

    Gas Plug in the wrong position by 45 degs

    Early Flash Eliminator

    Trigger Mechanism Housing belongs to another rifle UE83 A201447

    On that I do have a pic taken from the web many years ago, probably from another deact rifle marked RIFLE7.62M/MLIAI UE83 A20xxxx


    Here's the markings from a 1961 made Enfield L1A1 rifle

  2. The Following 4 Members Say Thank You to nzl1a1collector For This Useful Post:


  3. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  4. #12
    Contributing Member mrclark303's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last On
    Today @ 11:11 AM
    Location
    The wild west of England
    Posts
    3,401
    Real Name
    Mr Clark
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    07:27 PM
    Thread Starter
    Cheers Kev, many thanks for your L1 expertise as ever.
    It is a very interesting rifle, it's such a shame records from Enfield aren't available. It looks like some rather interesting things were going on at the factory in the early 1980's. I wonder how many rifles were built up on Lithgowicon Receiver and TMH assemblies?

    I find it very interesting that we effectively have two rifles here with 1980's Enfield markings.

    It suggests that a batch of late rifles have been stripped, deactivated and reassembled as mix masters.
    .303, helping Englishmen express their feelings since 1889

  5. Thank You to mrclark303 For This Useful Post:


  6. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  7. #13
    Legacy Member enbloc8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-26-2024 @ 04:49 AM
    Posts
    235
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    01:27 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by mrclark303 View Post
    Cheers Kev, many thanks for your L1 expertise as ever.
    It is a very interesting rifle, it's such a shame records from Enfield aren't available. It looks like some rather interesting things were going on at the factory in the early 1980's. I wonder how many rifles were built up on Lithgowicon Receiver and TMH assemblies?

    I find it very interesting that we effectively have two rifles here with 1980's Enfield markings.

    It suggests that a batch of late rifles have been stripped, deactivated and reassembled as mix masters.
    I've never even heard of such a late rifle appearing in the US, either complete or as parts.

    My guess is that the MoD needed small quantities of new rifles (maybe to replace scrapped ones), they couldn't justify purchasing complete rifles from Lithgow as they had done a decade earlier, and Enfield decided they didn't need enough rifle bodies and TMHs to justify making them domestically. Sort of a "late in life" compromise to extend the rifle's service a little longer, especially with (for better or worse) a replacement already on the horizon.

    A detailed examination of both rifles (the original one, and the one mentioned above by Kevin) for part dates and makers might have yielded some interesting clues.

  8. #14
    Legacy Member BigBadDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Last On
    @
    Location
    NL
    Posts
    52
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    06:27 PM
    Also
    Rear sling swivel missing.
    From what I can make out in the photo the front sight grub screw could be missing.
    Front sight looks suspiciously high, bent barrel?
    Looks like the gas cylinder is missing. Part of the deac perhaps?
    The head of the rivet under the tmh lever looks like it’s been messed with.
    Locking shoulder, from r/h side looks poorly fitted.
    The back sight leaf should have an angle cut on its front side on the side where the stop pin is. Prevented shearing off of said pin and losing your back sight.
    On the Britishicon variant at least, there should be the rifles serial number clearly marked on the carrier and visible through the ejection slot.
    Bets on the bolt having a different serial number?

    The fractures in the top slide are not uncommon. When the fracture was observed the fractured section was removed and the area that had contained the now missing part was filed off to a square profile. That’s at least how we did it in the 80’s.

    A Bitser? Put together by someone lacking the requisite knowledge.

    We never replaced an old pattern flash eliminator just because a newer one was available. If it wasn’t broke leave it alone.

    ---------- Post added at 04:49 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:47 PM ----------

    And poorly fitted hand guards.

  9. Thank You to BigBadDog For This Useful Post:


  10. #15
    Contributing Member mrclark303's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last On
    Today @ 11:11 AM
    Location
    The wild west of England
    Posts
    3,401
    Real Name
    Mr Clark
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    07:27 PM
    Thread Starter
    I think many of these things are assembled from parts bins, probably because it's easier to store Section one parts than complete Section five rifles...

    I believe they generally remove / don't fit gas tubes and the pivot pin assembly is now welded together to allow pivot, but prevent disassembly of the deactivated rifle.

    I see what you mean about locking shoulder, looks like someone malleted it in the wrong way round with a sledgehammer!

  11. #16
    Legacy Member enbloc8's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-26-2024 @ 04:49 AM
    Posts
    235
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    01:27 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by mrclark303 View Post
    I think many of these things are assembled from parts bins, probably because it's easier to store Section one parts than complete Section five rifles...
    I could see that...what parts would require special storage, apart from the barreled action bodies?

    Per the large overall view of the left side, the trigger's an Enfield 87.

  12. #17
    Contributing Member mrclark303's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last On
    Today @ 11:11 AM
    Location
    The wild west of England
    Posts
    3,401
    Real Name
    Mr Clark
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    07:27 PM
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by enbloc8 View Post
    I could see that...what parts would require special storage, apart from the barreled action bodies?

    Per the large overall view of the left side, the trigger's an Enfield 87.
    Basically, restricted and licenced parts are components that would be regarded as pressure baring, i.e, barrel, receiver, breech block and Carrier in the case of the L1A1.
    The only caveat would be the Flash Eliminator, that's regarded as a controlled part.

    Oddly, the TMH is a grey area, some regard it as controlled, others not. I would say controlled just be on the side of caution..

    In the UKicon, complete rifles would be covered under the more restrictive Section 5 of the firearm Act, but reduced to component parts, the parts become Section 1. A less restrictive classification.

    I think I am correct in saying that a Section one dealer, could deactivate the component parts and assemble and certificate a deactivated L1 while remaining within Section 1??

    I believe the exception to this rule is handgun parts, as they remain section 5.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. Enterprise/Lithgow L1A1
    By Anzac15 in forum FNFAL Rifles
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-28-2017, 02:51 PM
  2. Lithgow L1A1
    By mrclark303 in forum FNFAL Rifles
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 04-23-2013, 03:06 AM
  3. 1917 Enfield receiver with 1944 lithgow stock and parts.
    By Kiwi in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 12-19-2012, 06:46 AM
  4. Value of Lithgow L1A1 skeleton
    By Rusty.303 in forum FNFAL Rifles
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 02-11-2012, 11:14 AM
  5. Lower receiver markings on my L1A1
    By enbloc8 in forum FNFAL Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-03-2010, 11:37 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks