+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: Loading a New Belt onto a Belt-Fed MG

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #11
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    04-13-2024 @ 05:00 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,510
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    04-16-2024
    Local Time
    03:21 PM
    We couldn't lift the covers in our Centurions except for an inch or so. So it had to be a doubler pull of the cocking handle. Our drills cganged slightly on our L3 guns that fired from the open bolt. On the second pull, where the round was dragged from the belt by the extractor and lowered down into the bolt, the modified cocking handle latch was lifted so that the bolt was pulled slightly to the rear, clear of the trigger.
    How do I remember all this stuff.......? The old M1919 guns were a classic case of if it ain;t broke, don't fix it. In all my time as an Armourer, in tanks too (see the funny Centurion story further on somewhere.....) nobody ever understood why we changed - and complicated - the action of the trusty and well tried, from 1919 to 1966 - M1919 and came up with a rear sear L2A4 and 6. It wasn't even as though cook-offs were a problem. The OB reports at Warminster and Bovingdon did say that cook-offs were reported.......... in Korea. But the only known casualties were the Chinese Infantry. We didn't record those statistics.

    Browning M1919A4 and A6, the work of a master.
    Browning L3 A4 and 6, the work of Biffo the Bear

  2. The Following 3 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  3. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  4. #12
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 10:12 AM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,897
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    04-16-2024
    Local Time
    07:21 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Laidlericon View Post
    Browning M1919A4 and A6, the work of a master.
    You got that right. When we changed from the 1919A4 to the C1,C4, C5 models the games began. The first was barrel change and a couple parts in feed. After that, the bandages. For ever major mod there's what Peter? Eight or ten minor mods? You can't change one simple thing, so why didn't we just buy the MAG58? Because we're cheap.
    Regards, Jim

  5. Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post:


  6. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  7. #13
    Advisory Panel
    Peter Laidler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    04-13-2024 @ 05:00 AM
    Location
    Abingdon, Oxfordshire. The home of MG Cars
    Posts
    16,510
    Real Name
    Peter Laidler
    Local Date
    04-16-2024
    Local Time
    03:21 PM
    Got that Jim. We could never get our C-7.62mm spec Browning to function more than a few rounds.

    As for the .50 with the quick-change barrel....... Words fail me. I used to tell the trouble shooters. I used to tell the trouble shooters that the original gun worked on good basic physics. The modified guns FAIL due to bad basic physics in the form of metallurgy.. Dolf Goldsmith spent an hour telling them too............

  8. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Peter Laidler For This Useful Post:


  9. #14
    Contributing Member Flying10uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 04:38 PM
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    5,101
    Local Date
    04-16-2024
    Local Time
    03:21 PM
    Thread Starter
    Was there never a need to change the barrels on the air versions of the Browning 50 cal MG as used on B17 and other aircraft? I've never heard of the barrels being changed on air versions. Was the airflow, in flight, over the barrel sufficient to cool it?

  10. #15
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 10:12 AM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,897
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    04-16-2024
    Local Time
    07:21 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter Laidlericon View Post
    As for the .50 with the quick-change barrel
    Ours were painful too, old guns with new parts. The FN guns worked great and everyone thought we could do the same. They had new made guns with FN made ammo specially produced for the job. We had neither. As soon as they took my headspace and timing gauges, we were hooped.

    Quote Originally Posted by Flying10uk View Post
    change the barrels on the air versions of the Browning 50 cal MG
    Those guns only had a limited amount of ammo when they went up and would never exceed the guns capabilities while in flight. No ammo resupply, like us on the ground. We could just keep bringing ammo until the gun melts. Up there they only had a few hundred per gun or a thousand...not very much. The barrel was new on takeoff and gun would be completely overhauled upon landing. No barrel changes needed. The internals of the guns were a bit different too. Some of the externals differed as well.
    Regards, Jim

  11. Thank You to browningautorifle For This Useful Post:


  12. #16
    Legacy Member Bruce_in_Oz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 03:20 AM
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    2,241
    Local Date
    04-17-2024
    Local Time
    12:21 AM
    And it gets downright chilly at 20-plus thousand feet in an um-pressurized aircraft. Five hundred rounds of the big Fifty, fired in controlled bursts in such drafty conditions is not likely to cause issues of metallurgical failure in such circumstances.

    At sea-level, assaulting Tarawa in the tropics? Who cares about barrel-life?

    The LVT 4 carried a 20mm Polsten with a drum feed and a couple of . 30 cal BMGs. If they survived the crossing of the coral shelf and the drive up the beach, it was a miracle of sorts.

  13. #17
    Contributing Member muffett.2008's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Last On
    Today @ 05:56 AM
    Location
    Scone, NSW. Australia
    Posts
    2,164
    Real Name
    kevin muffett
    Local Date
    04-17-2024
    Local Time
    12:21 AM
    Pulling up the belt in .30 and .50 cal in the T50 Turret was a fight in itself, the narrow finger channel did not give much room for mistakes, one slip ad the belt would cheerfully rattle back down into the ammo box.
    Hence the metal lead in tab, once started you simply pulled the tab along the slot, if you needed to stop, you just raised the tab to the vertical position, this allowed tabs on it's base to lock in to the feed chute, even so, the unwary would still here the death rattle of the belt snaking back.

    Prior to these we still had the old cloth belt, always able to clear a stoppage by giving the belt a good yank.

    For some strange reason, I have both feed chutes in my back shed, not sure why, maybe planned to modify them......just don't remember, too long ago.
    Last edited by muffett.2008; 03-01-2023 at 05:15 AM.

  14. #18
    Contributing Member CINDERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 01:08 PM
    Location
    South West Western Australia
    Posts
    7,749
    Real Name
    CINDERS
    Local Date
    04-16-2024
    Local Time
    10:21 PM
    Quote Originally Posted by browningautorifleicon View Post
    when they went up
    I think they had a different rate of fire for the air mounted 50 BMG weapons as the footage I've seen on them operating with ground troops the cyclic rate of the air ones seems allot higher.

  15. #19
    Advisory Panel browningautorifle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    Today @ 10:12 AM
    Location
    Victoria BC
    Posts
    29,897
    Real Name
    Jim
    Local Date
    04-16-2024
    Local Time
    07:21 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce_in_Oz View Post
    fired in controlled bursts
    They had to be controlled in the aircraft as there was no resupply coming.
    Regards, Jim

  16. #20
    Contributing Member fjruple's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Last On
    10-29-2023 @ 04:38 AM
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    1,021
    Real Name
    Franklin Ruple
    Local Date
    04-16-2024
    Local Time
    10:21 AM
    Quote Originally Posted by browningautorifleicon View Post
    Interesting, did you folk make them? Ours were IVI produced and the US issue dropped the lead tab too. Agreed about the turret deal, even after our Grizzly turret decreased in size to the Cadillac-Gage model we were still doing open cover loads with both .50 and 1919A4 (C-5). I don't remember seeing them when I was there in Australiaicon in '77 either and we had a few M113s with the double turrets...but they were .30 cal guns, weren't they? The lead tabs were dropped by us when we changed from .30 cal to 7.62. That was about 1970.
    Jim-- I lot of it depends on the manufacturer and the countries' military specifications. I know the US manufactured .30 caliber linked ammunition came with a metal start tab as manufactured. In a tank mounted M37 .30 caliber Browning, the starter tab had it be removed in order to load the weapon as the starter tab would not pass through link chute on the gun. The US manufactured millions of rounds of linked and cloth belted .30 caliber ammunition for the Browning .30 caliber series of MGs. We had so much of the stuff it lasted through the Vietnam war. Until recently the CMPicon was breaking down Mg belts to reload the ammunition into 8 round enbloc clicks for the M1icon rifle. Additionally I know that the Germanicon DM6 7.62mm NATO ammunition belts also came with a starter tab.

  17. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to fjruple For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. RPD belt loading
    By jdmcomp in forum Other LMG/HMG and SMG Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-23-2016, 03:36 AM
  2. BAR web belt ID Help
    By Garand51 in forum Vintage Military Gear
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 04-29-2014, 07:31 PM
  3. Bar Belt
    By SRiverrat11 in forum Vintage Military Gear
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-23-2013, 12:26 AM
  4. Belt fed!
    By Bill Hollinger in forum The Watering Hole OT (Off Topic) Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-27-2010, 02:05 AM
  5. Can you ID this belt?
    By Snafu in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield Rifle
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-07-2009, 11:07 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts