+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Pattern 1853 Enfield Rifled Musket----C.S. or U.S.?—a story.

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member drm2m's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-05-2022 @ 11:44 AM
    Location
    Quebec
    Posts
    216
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    02:18 PM

    Pattern 1853 Enfield Rifled Musket----C.S. or U.S.?—a story.

    I requested Joe Bilby’s help regarding this gun because of the numbers seen on the butt tang and this is the story that unfolded.

    (Any references to “Jack” is a “made up” name as he is not someone I know.)


    The gun.


















    Pattern 1853 Enfield Rifled Musket (second type)
    Manufactured in 1861. (BIRMINGHAM “TOWER”)

    (The sling shown in these photos is not period correct.)


    Other markings:

    Crown behind hammer on lock plate with the date 1861 TOWER,
    Inside lock-E.C&W.C, back of hammer E 8, 8 also on lock plate behind hammer.
    Under barrel, J.R.Cooper also E.C (over) J.H. and another J.H.

    -74 on breech plug and breech (under barrel) ---Breech barrel flat (left side) 3 proof marks, and twice the number 24.
    Inside barrel groove in stock just behind spoon spring-XX


    I emailed Joe Bilby on March 10 2006 with photos of the Butt tang marking “1121” as well as the “24” bore marking on the barrel.
    He consulted with an expert on Civil War Enfields, “Jack”, and the following extracts are from his communication on this subject;

    Joe, do the markings on the butt plate tang of this Enfield fit any kind of Civil War markings pattern that you are familiar with?
    Thanks again for your help.
    Regards
    David

    I'll forward it to my Enfield expert and get back to you. The "24" on the barrel indicates the guns bore size, which is .58 calibers rather than the standard "25 bore" or Britishicon .577. This is one indication that the gun may be a Union import.

    Joe

    This from my Enfield guy. You may have hit the jackpot.

    Joe

    While it's difficult to positively ID anything and to determine legitimacy from a photo, the piece seems to be a CS central government purchase. 1121 is the "control number." If the ramrod is original to the piece, it will also have 1121 engraved on it near the jag head. There should have been a large serif letter in front of the butt plate tang, but the stock seems to have been scraped. On the bottom of the stock behind the trigger guard, there should be two commission broker's stamps and a JS anchor stamp. The stampings behind the trigger guards were often light. Lacking the anchor stamp, there should be either a G or an SC on the lock side of the butt stock for this particular number range.

    Some of the numbered arms can be traced to the vessel and the jobber, but - this is the big hole in the argument presented by the high-rolling dealers - there are only extant records for 2,000 arms that were brought into Savannah. Most CS dealers like to lead the buyer to believe that there are records for 30,000 numbered arms.

    If I ever get my book done, I will attempt to uncloud some of the mystery. Brit regulations specified that all arms were to have a number not to exceed four digits engraved "and in no instance stamped or punched" on the butt plate, the ramrod, the bayonet socket, the bayonet scabbard stud, and the waist belt. In short, each stand of arms had all of the components numbered together. The Confederates followed the same practice at first, but then realized that it was a waste of time. The Confederates also used a few other numbering methods, and several states also had their own numbering systems. Many Army of Tennessee arms had an additional mark applied.

    The piece is not a Brit issue as it lacks the army proof house markings - even arms bought commercially for Brit service were normally reproofed at an army proof house.
    The piece in the photo you sent is a Grade 2 handmade arm with filed flat-headed mount screws.



    Joe, after looking at the reference points referred to below I have observed the following;

    (1) No marking on the ramrod indicating the #s 1121.

    (2) “There should have been a large serif letter in front of the butt plate tang,” NONE SEEN.

    (3) “On the bottom of the stock behind the trigger guard, there should be two commission broker's stamps and a JS anchor stamp. The stampings behind the trigger guards were often light. Lacking the anchor stamp, there should be either a G or an SC on the lock side of the butt stock for this particular number range.” NONE SEEN”

    Joe, I have no idea where that leaves us???

    Best regards and thank you
    David




    Still probably Confederate.

    Joe


    The fact that that it may have a C.S. history really surprises me,….but what do I know? I would have thought that a “25” bore marking .58 cal. would have suggested a Union gun if anything?
    I guess my original question started with the tang marking “1121”, and look where we have progressed to.
    Thanks very much for your help.

    Best regards
    David



    Surprised me as well. But I think the early Confederate orders might have been 24 bore. My friend, who is an expert in these matters, says he is almost positive it is Confederate, with the number on the buttplate and the 24 bore marking. You made a really good buy. :-)

    Joe



    This is rather exciting (and unexpected) Joe,….thank you very much for your help, and please express my appreciation to your friend.
    Best regards
    David




    I will, but as my buddy advises, you still got 90% to go before you can call it Confederate definitively -- but you got a good possibility. :-)

    He also advises that some Enfields made for the US, in 24 bore, in the early part of the war, were actually bought by the Rebels, and that might explain the bore size.

    Joe



    Joe what does this mean exactly,

    “you still got 90% to go before you can call it Confederate definitively -- but you got a good possibility”…..what is the process, and what does the next step involve …if anything?
    I plan on keeping this gun…what would you do if you were me???

    May I know your friends’ name,…I have started reading your articles, as well as those of Tom Kelley and Tony Beck,…great stuff.
    I have noticed several references to “ in the early part of the war”, I realize that this gun is 1861 dated;… did the early Confederate guns fit into a particular configuration that has been documented that this particular gun can be compared to?
    I really appreciate your help and insight Joe, ..and that of your friend.
    Best regards
    David



    My buddy is “Jack”, who has been amassing info on Enfields and Rebel firearms in general for many years. The "90%" means that the number on the buttstock is a sign, but that, unfortunately, the other markings he mentioned are either not there or have been removed over the years -- still, a 10% confederate firearm is worth a lot more than a conventional Enfield.

    I would keep it, myself. By the way, “Jack” also said there were an unusual number of Confederate arms that showed up in Canadaicon, but he did not know why -- speculation of Canadian Volunteer organizations buying surplus captured stuff from US dealers, but nothing definite.

    Joe
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.
    Last edited by drm2m; 04-09-2009 at 02:01 AM.

  2. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to drm2m For This Useful Post:


  3. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  4. #2
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    tbeck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last On
    08-22-2011 @ 12:02 PM
    Posts
    27
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    02:18 PM
    David, if you are still watching this post, how long is the barrel? The reason I ask is that early in the war Sam Colt's agent contracted for P-53s to be 24 gauge with 40" barrels, with the intention of selling them to the US government. (The English standard was 39".) The deal fell through and Colt dumped the barrels (and maybe the whole guns) on the market in Birmingham. I need to do some research on the details, but a lot of them ended up being sold to Southern agents. I encountered one in the Charleston area a few years ago and heard of another in NC, both with engraved lot numbers.

    That is the nicest early war Enfield I've seen in a very long time.

  5. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  6. #3
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    RETREAD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last On
    11-22-2011 @ 10:46 PM
    Posts
    47
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    01:18 PM

    Smile Enfield

    The tang numbers on CSA used P 53's were reportedly engraved, rather than punched or stamped. These numbers appear to have been engraved. Have they ??

  7. #4
    Legacy Member drm2m's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Last On
    06-05-2022 @ 11:44 AM
    Location
    Quebec
    Posts
    216
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    02:18 PM
    Thread Starter
    Sorry for taking so long to reply I have not been monitoring this post.

    Tbeck, 39 inches to the rear of the nipple.
    Thanks for your interest.

    Retread ... the numbers are engraved that is what caused Joe Bilby to pursue the possible C.S. connection.

    David

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Pattern 14 Enfield Question...
    By Calum in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-25-2009, 08:10 PM
  2. Enfield Pattern 1917
    By brownie in forum Ammunition and Reloading for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-17-2008, 07:48 AM
  3. Book - Enfield Story
    By Karl in forum Commercial Auction and Sale "Gossip"
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-14-2007, 04:45 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks