+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: difference between 1861 springfield and 1863?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Timmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    10-14-2011 @ 11:34 PM
    Location
    Denver CO area
    Posts
    21
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    03:41 AM

    difference between 1861 springfield and 1863?

    Please educate me. I see advertsements of people selling 1861 springfield muskets with a date of 1863 on the lock. Are they the same or are there differences? Thanks.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Legacy Member Embalmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    02-05-2024 @ 12:07 PM
    Location
    North Shore Mass
    Posts
    190
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:41 AM
    some pristine 1863s ive seen, differences from a 61 is the lock and hammer are casecolored, and bands and rear sights are sometimes found blued. other than they identical in shape. there are supposedly a type I and type II 63 springfield, but dont know exactly what the differences between the 2 types are.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    roosterinalabamy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    08-11-2009 @ 09:21 AM
    Location
    Bessemer Alabama
    Age
    72
    Posts
    13
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:41 AM

    '61 Springfield

    the pattern 1861 and 1863 were very similiar. IMHO the main difference was the 1861 has a clean our screw for the cone, (nipple). the '63's do not have the clean out screw. the shortcoming of the '61 was the path of fire from the percussion cap. it went straight down to the cleanout screw and made a left turn into the barrel to ignite the powder charge. Keep a nipple pick handy, and make sure you do a super job of cleaning. The 61's were also made as "specials", meaning they incorporated many of the characteristics of the Enfield, Colt made many of these. the dates on the lock won't neccesarily correspond with the pattern number. my 2 cents, often wrong but never in doubt! hope this helps a little.

  6. #4
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    threepdr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-01-2015 @ 08:55 PM
    Location
    Huntsville, AL
    Posts
    49
    Real Name
    Mark Hubbs
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    03:41 AM
    Model 1855 - "C" shaped hammer designed to fit around the Maynard Priming System door on the lock. Rounded bolster with clean out screw. Three flat barrel bands held in place by band springs. Rammer has a swelled area to hold in the stock that is 5 inches below the tulip shaped tip. Early Models of the M55 had no patch box and used a long range rear sight. Later models adopted a patchbox and used as simpler three leaf rear sight. Made at Springfield and Harpers Ferry.

    Model 1861 - Retained the "C" shaped hammer but ommited the Maynard Priming System. No Patch box. Otherwise same as Model 1855. Made at Springfield in 1861 and 1862. Made by several contractors 1862 - 1865

    Model 1861 "Special". Made by Colt and two other contractors on machinery originally designed to made Britishicon Enfields. This was essentially an Enfield in disquise to adhere closer to the Springfield standard.

    Model 1863 - The rounded bolster was ommited and replaced by a flat bolser with no clean-out screw. Three leaf sight was replaced by two leafs that inlude "peeps" for various ranges. The hammer was replaced with an "S" shaped hammer similar to the Model 1861 "Special". Band springs were ommited. The flat bands were replaced with narrower oval screw clamping bands. These were also inspired by those on the 1861 Special. Made at Springfield in 1863.

    Model 1864 - Reports from the field indicated that the clamping bands would "jump" forward under heavy recoil. These were replaced by solid oval bands held by band springs. Otherwise, Identical to Model 1863. Made by Springfield 1864 -1865. Also produced by at least one contractor.

  7. #5
    Deceased March 19th, 2011 doncb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    03-07-2011 @ 07:02 AM
    Posts
    55
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:41 AM
    The 1863 was produced at Springfield armory only , they made 273,265 of them

  8. #6
    Legacy Member Embalmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    02-05-2024 @ 12:07 PM
    Location
    North Shore Mass
    Posts
    190
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    04:41 AM
    opps forgot about the cleanout screw and the new shaped hammer.

  9. #7
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    dsmc1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last On
    03-26-2011 @ 11:29 AM
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    14
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    05:41 AM
    I believe the 61 also had flat barrel bands, while the 63 had rounded ones, in addition tho the other differences noted here

  10. #8
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    tbeck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last On
    08-22-2011 @ 12:02 PM
    Posts
    27
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    05:41 AM
    Production of the various models overlapped a good bit. Contractors made mostly M-1861s throughout the war, but a few did switch to later models, such as Remington and Norris & Clements. Also, even thought the simplified 2 leaf sight was supposed to be installed on M-1863s, the 3 leaf sight is very common on them. Old stock was used until the later 2 leaf sight came into production. Even some M-1864s have the earlier sight.

    Production at Springfield, from "The US Model 1861 Springfield Rifle-Musket" by Hartzler, Yantz and Whisker:

    M-1861
    1861 33,572
    1862 173,809
    1863 57,748

    M-1863
    1863 183,064
    1864 90,201

    M-1864
    1864 157,463
    1865 97,577

    (Tried to do this as a table, but it didn't work.)

    Here are a couple pictures to give you a guide to the main difference between the early and late models.
    Last edited by tbeck; 11-24-2009 at 09:30 PM. Reason: table fix

  11. #9
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    tbeck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last On
    08-22-2011 @ 12:02 PM
    Posts
    27
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    05:41 AM
    One other comment, many of the M-1863s with clamping barrel bands were broken down for parts after the war, since the stocks were easy to cut down for M-1868 and M-1870 Trapdoor conversions. The M-1864s tended to survive intact since the band spring cuts in the stocks precluded using them for later models. M-1863s are more scarce than their production numbers would lead one to believe.
    Last edited by tbeck; 11-24-2009 at 09:39 PM. Reason: Dystypsia!

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Original 1861 Springfield musket worth?
    By Rick the Librarian in forum Black Powder
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-04-2009, 11:18 PM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-08-2009, 10:58 PM
  3. Whats the difference between?
    By Orlando in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-25-2009, 10:49 AM
  4. 1861 Enfield
    By scjordan in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-29-2008, 06:38 PM
  5. How can you tell the difference?
    By Oatmeal Savage in forum Commercial Auction and Sale "Gossip"
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-05-2007, 12:53 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks