+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: No4 Mk1* Long Branch rear sight question.

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Contributing Member Thunderstreak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2023
    Last On
    09-11-2024 @ 10:34 AM
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    37
    Local Date
    10-03-2024
    Local Time
    03:33 PM

    No4 Mk1* Long Branch rear sight question.

    I have a 1943 RCAF issued Long Branch No4 Mk1*.
    I am wondering which if either of the pictured rear sights is the type it originally came with and/or would be period correct?
    Alternatively, should it have the 2 position 300/600 rear sight?
    Thanks and cheers!




  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    Contributing Member Neuraleanus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2023
    Last On
    Yesterday @ 08:54 PM
    Location
    Kenosha, WI
    Posts
    40
    Real Name
    Lee Holeva
    Local Date
    10-03-2024
    Local Time
    02:33 PM
    It is my understanding that all three types are correct. The two position sight was a war-time stop gap and then came the Mk III. The vernier sight was considered a field upgrade.

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Legacy Member Bindi2's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Last On
    09-29-2024 @ 09:32 PM
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    1,457
    Local Date
    10-04-2024
    Local Time
    03:33 AM
    What ever is on the rifle when it leaves service is correct.

  6. Thank You to Bindi2 For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    Legacy Member Strangely Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    Today @ 09:08 AM
    Location
    Wiltshire UK
    Age
    73
    Posts
    555
    Real Name
    Mick Kelly
    Local Date
    10-03-2024
    Local Time
    08:33 PM
    If you intend to shoot it don't be too pedantic about what it should wearing; I would opt for the Mk1 every time.
    Mick

  8. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to Strangely Brown For This Useful Post:


  9. #5
    Advisory Panel tiriaq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    Today @ 02:07 PM
    Location
    Central Ontario
    Age
    78
    Posts
    1,102
    Local Date
    10-03-2024
    Local Time
    03:33 PM
    The rifle probably left SAL with the 2 range Mk. II sight. In all likelihood, this would have been replaced with a Mk. III. A RCMP armourer might have installed a Mk. I, for enhanced adjustability. Some of these RCMP rifles were also fitted with PH5C sights. None of these options are "wrong", but the Mk. Mk. III sight would most likely have been on the rifle when in RCMP service.
    Incidentally, when these rifles were deemed surplus, they were sold off for $45 or so.

  10. The Following 2 Members Say Thank You to tiriaq For This Useful Post:


  11. #6
    Contributing Member Thunderstreak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2023
    Last On
    09-11-2024 @ 10:34 AM
    Location
    Ontario
    Posts
    37
    Local Date
    10-03-2024
    Local Time
    03:33 PM
    Thread Starter
    RCAF, not RCMP! Good information regardless! Thanks for everyone’s input. I think I’ll install the micrometer sight, just my preference. No intention of selling it but it’s probably worth slightly more than $45, probably closer to $100.

  12. #7
    Advisory Panel tiriaq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last On
    Today @ 02:07 PM
    Location
    Central Ontario
    Age
    78
    Posts
    1,102
    Local Date
    10-03-2024
    Local Time
    03:33 PM
    Indeed RCAF, not RCMP! I think my sight comments would still apply. The Mk. II sights were culled in CDN service, being replaced with Mk. IIIs.

  13. #8
    Advisory Panel Surpmil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    West side
    Posts
    4,821
    Local Date
    10-03-2024
    Local Time
    12:33 PM
    The fact is that the Mk.III is a better sight than the Mk.I for a number of reasons: the leaf does not wobble about when set and it can be set to a range in a moment and has a positive indent which can be felt as well as seen.
    Whereas going from say 200 to 800 on the Mk.I involves spinning that little wheel around until the marks line up and confirming that they do only by eye.
    This is why the Ross Mk.III had such a fast pitch of thread on the sight adjustment screw.
    The Mk.I is more robust overall, but in war that's not the only consideration.
    Last edited by Surpmil; 07-20-2024 at 11:37 AM. Reason: Typo
    “There are invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions. It is not generally realized to what extent the words and actions of our most influential public men are dictated by shrewd persons operating behind the scenes.”

    Edward Bernays, 1928

    Much changes, much remains the same.

  14. #9
    Legacy Member Mk VII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    09-30-2024 @ 05:58 PM
    Location
    England
    Age
    63
    Posts
    1,418
    Real Name
    James West
    Local Date
    10-03-2024
    Local Time
    08:33 PM
    A cable from Britishicon Army Staff Washington dated 31-8-42 notes ' Present USAicon and Cdn rifles have Mark two (tip-up) sights. '

  15. Thank You to Mk VII For This Useful Post:


+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Long Branch C No.7 Rear sight parts and original .22 barrel
    By bobcat789 in forum WTS/WTB/WTT (Want to Sell, Buy or Trade) Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-28-2022, 01:44 AM
  2. Long Branch rear sight
    By Robbo2 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-22-2015, 02:24 PM
  3. Proper Rear Sight for Long Branch No4 MK1*
    By Banjo1928 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-12-2015, 12:59 PM
  4. 1949 Long Branch rear sight and barrel?
    By 3mctoledo in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-10-2013, 12:48 PM
  5. Long Branch No.4 Rear Sight w Very Small Aperture ????
    By RCEMERalf in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-05-2012, 10:27 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts