+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: 6.5 Arisaka Ammo

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member andiarisaka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Last On
    02-22-2024 @ 04:00 PM
    Location
    Upper Appalachia aka SE Ohio
    Posts
    343
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    11:06 AM

    6.5 Arisaka Ammo

    In 1897, when the 6.5 Arisakaicon round was adopted, the big players in the Pacific were the Britishicon, the Dutch, and a few years later, the US. I've noted the 6.5 Arisaka can be formed from the .303 British, the 6.5 Dutch, and the US Kragicon. I wonder if this fact might have played a part in the adoption of such a small cartridge, with the Japanese at that time looking towards the possibility of making use of captured stores of ammo. The Dutch ammo would be especially easy to modify for the type 30 or 38 rilfes. An early Type 38 that I have has a chamber long enough in the neck to accept the Dutch ammo.
    Information
    Warning: This is a relatively older thread
    This discussion is older than 360 days. Some information contained in it may no longer be current.

  2. # ADS
    Friends and Sponsors
    Join Date
    October 2006
    Location
    Milsurps.Com
    Posts
    All Threads
    A Collector's View - The SMLE Short Magazine Lee Enfield 1903-1989. It is 300 8.5x11 inch pages with 1,000+ photo’s, most in color, and each book is serial-numbered.  Covering the SMLE from 1903 to the end of production in India in 1989 it looks at how each model differs and manufacturer differences from a collecting point of view along with the major accessories that could be attached to the rifle. For the record this is not a moneymaker, I hope just to break even, eventually, at $80/book plus shipping.  In the USA shipping is $5.00 for media mail.  I will accept PayPal, Zelle, MO and good old checks (and cash if you want to stop by for a tour!).  CLICK BANNER to send me a PM for International pricing and shipping. Manufacturer of various vintage rifle scopes for the 1903 such as our M73G4 (reproduction of the Weaver 330C) and Malcolm 8X Gen II (Unertl reproduction). Several of our scopes are used in the CMP Vintage Sniper competition on top of 1903 rifles. Brian Dick ... BDL Ltd. - Specializing in British and Commonwealth weapons Specializing in premium ammunition and reloading components. Your source for the finest in High Power Competition Gear. Here at T-bones Shipwrighting we specialise in vintage service rifle: re-barrelling, bedding, repairs, modifications and accurizing. We also provide importation services for firearms, parts and weapons, for both private or commercial businesses.
     

  3. #2
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Jim K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    12-01-2009 @ 03:41 PM
    Posts
    505
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    12:06 PM
    I have never heard of any army adopting a cartridge based on what enemy cartridges it could be made from, although some did adopt rounds based on minimal changes to their own cartridge making machinery. The only way a Japaneseicon army could make use of captured ammo would be to carry around equipment to break down the ammo, then resize, reshape and trim cases, etc. No army would do such a thing. If they captured stores of ammo, they would also have captured rifles, and if necessary would simply have issued both the rifles and the ammo to their own forces, as the Germans did to some extent in WWII.

    Armies tend to follow fads in weapons and ammunition, with a lot of "keeping up with the Joneses" involved. At that time, smokeless powder had provided enough velocity that the use of smaller bullets was practical, and the armies discarded their old 11-13mm cartridges in favor of what was then called "small bore", roughly 6mm-8mm. A few, like the U.S. Navy, went to 6mm, and Germanyicon and others stopped at 8mm, but quite a few nations adopted the 6.5mm as giving adequate lethality combined with light recoil, good accuracy and less ammunition cost and weight. (The same things that were said later about the U.S.icon5.56mm and the Russianicon 5.45mm, the latest cartridges in the current small bore fad.)

    Jim

  4. Avoid Ads - Become a Contributing Member - Click HERE
  5. #3
    Legacy Member Calif-Steve's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    10-01-2023 @ 12:52 AM
    Posts
    2,508
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    11:06 AM
    Japanicon has never had any real sort of weapons in its civilians hands. No weapons development to speak of. They, indeed, followed all of the fads. They also had a very dificult time manufacturing weapons. Numerous smaller arsenals and parts interchanability was terrible all through WWII.

  6. #4
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Jim K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    12-01-2009 @ 03:41 PM
    Posts
    505
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    12:06 PM
    I don't know that the Japaneseicon had any real parts interchangeability problems; I have replaced parts on Japanese rifles and had no problems in fitting them. There were some problems with local weapons manufacturing in Manchukuo (Manchuria) but those weapons were made and used locally; they didn't affect the overall war effort.

    They did not seem to have any major manufacturing problems; their military was well supplied with small arms throughout the war. The very crude so-called "last ditch" rifles were intended for distribuiton to the civilian populace, not to organized military forces, and not many were actually made.

    Judging by the number of "ground mum" rifles brought back by Americans, there were large numbers of rifles available in Japanese homeland depots, probably more than enough to arm any military/militia forces without the "last ditch" rifles.

    The Japanese did have some ammunition supply problems due to having two calibers in service, but their main problems were in getting ammunition and reinforcements to their troops in a widespread combat area. Those problems were due mainly to American submarines, which sank hundreds of Japanese supply and troop ships before they ever reached the fighting front.

    Jim

  7. #5
    Legacy Member Bruce McAskill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    01-17-2023 @ 09:10 PM
    Posts
    1,880
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    11:06 AM
    The quality of Japaneseicon weapons well into 1943 in general was very good. The type 38 and the type 99 rifles were some of the strongest actions ever made and even surpassing the 98 Mauser on which they were based. As JimK said ammo was a problem as far as the 7.7 type 99 for not only did they have the ammo for these rifles but there were two more versions that they also had to make. Rimless for the rifles and a semi-rimless and a rimmed case for machine guns. All marked as being 7.7 which must have created some huge problems down the line.

  8. #6
    FREE MEMBER
    NO Posting or PM's Allowed
    Jim K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Last On
    12-01-2009 @ 03:41 PM
    Posts
    505
    Local Date
    03-28-2024
    Local Time
    12:06 PM
    The confusion among the three 7.7 cartridges was probably less than we might think. As Bruce says, the rimless was for rifles and was issued in rifle "stripper" clips. The 7.7 semi-rimmed was made for the Hotchkiss type heavy MG and was issued only in feed strips. The 7.7 rimmed was an exact copy of the .303 Britishicon and was used only by the Navy for their license-built Lewis gun copies. I have seen pictures of the Japaneseicon Lewis guns in action on ground mounts with the Naval Landing Forces*, but even so I think confusion would have been minimal.

    Jim

    *Americans sometimes called them "Jap Marines" but the Japanese did not have a separate Marine Corps as the US and Britain did. The guys with anchors on their helmets were sailors and wore Navy insignia.

    JK

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. I need an Arisaka 99 expert
    By degumper in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-22-2009, 10:41 PM
  2. 6,5x50 Arisaka ammo
    By PerversPépère in forum Ammunition and Reloading for Old Milsurps
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-18-2008, 04:47 PM
  3. Arisaka T38 Rifle Parts?
    By Teikoku Armyman in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-15-2007, 06:13 PM
  4. WHy would an Arisaka have arab markings?
    By Skippy in forum Milsurps General Discussion Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-04-2007, 05:32 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Raven Rocks