Possible correlation between feeding and how worn an M1 Carbine is?
I was wondering if there is a possible correlation between how well a carbine feeds (functions) and how new of a condition, or old and worn it is.
My original Inland is 95% to 98% finish and an ME of less than 1 (probably about "0").
My Standard Products mix-master's barreled receiver (and most other parts, too) is about 90%+ original finish, and an ME of between 1 and 2.
Both appear to have been shot very little, compared to many of the carbines I have had. Both function flawlessly with GI 30 rounders, no matter what ammo I use.
Granted, I replaced recoil springs in both prior to shooting, as a matter of course, and ejector and extractor springs in the mix-master. I still wonder, however, if old, much more used carbines are more prone to malfunction than lesser used ones.
While this is no way scientific, I wonder what experiences others have had
I always grease the carbine just like the big rifle
I look at the slide and think that a single recoil spring has to induce some side loading, so grease the slots along the side of the barrel and receiver notch on the right side. In addition, I use the white GI oil which stays where it is put and works great. A lot of those worn out slides are caused by WD40 or 3-1 oil use. Amen to what Bruce says. How can an assembled bolt be considered clean by soaking in some solvent or boiling it? The holes for the plunger are full of carbon, dirt and unburned powder. The fact that the parts are much smaller than the big rifle makes cleaning them and looking at them that much more important.