That was what I was wondering about the hardening, perhaps the rear was softer.
Printable View
That was what I was wondering about the hardening, perhaps the rear was softer.
This---
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...12959940-1.jpg
Came on this---
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...12959939-1.jpg
Matching the receiver and bolt number, too. Don't have the rifle anymore, so can offer no other views.
-----krinko
Yep as far as i am aware only BSA numbered the cocking piece a practice that goes back to the Long Lees (well at least they did on the 1901 BSA MLE Mk1* with a A prefix that NZ received) not sure when they stopped though.
My 1911 BSA MkIII
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...markings-1.jpg
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...SAMkIII1-1.jpg
https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...SAMkIII2-1.jpg
Thinking about it, I suppose they had to number the cocking pieces then because the bolt/bolt head configuration and coin slot in the cocking piece striker screw retainer meant that the crunchies could strip the bloody thing down. And guess what's likely to happen when they do...............? Yep......., got it in one!
To be honest Peter, having experience with those rifles...I'd rather pour boiling water into the assembled bolt or use red gas to clean it. Then submerge it in oil and leave it to drain that mess with the spring without tools. Matter of fact, today I'd do that.