I was referring to the range pattern CINDERS, i agree the 27 would stay as is, well maybe replace whats missing.Quote:
Originally Posted by CINDERS
Printable View
I was referring to the range pattern CINDERS, i agree the 27 would stay as is, well maybe replace whats missing.Quote:
Originally Posted by CINDERS
There was also a 1944 Lithgow that sold for $150 a few days ago on Used Guns.
The only firearm I regret selling was a M95 Steyr Carbine in 8x56r. It was pretty smooth and accurate (had the front sight changed out by the Bulgarians to a 100m zero). Not something everyone likes but I quite enjoyed it. I ended up selling it to someone who was going on about there family heritage and wanting this to be the start of there collection, etc.. I sold it at a very fair price as I just wanted it to be taken care of and I truly felt I was helping someone out. Not even a month and a half later buddy had it for sale for 200$ more than I sold it for and he got what he was asking.
I was not the happiest to say the least.
That is not a good outcome...
Of all of the things I miss, I miss my mind the most.:madsmile:
It looked to have a nice set of Maple on it............win some, lose some.
I just hope a collector grabbed it, not some young buck that was looking for a cheap one to sporterize.
Didn't miss this one though.
Attachment 66805Attachment 66806
How much of it is matching?Quote:
Originally Posted by muffett.2008
Later barrel,nosecap and forewood and bolt is correctly numbered and correct vintage but PAA does not match, so maybe a factory replacement as it has crossed out numbers.
This could be one of Demo's discards, took it off another collector a bit north of him.
Nope not mine.
Hey Andrew, Phil G, he said he had dealings with you.