1903 Mark I Finish

Hi gentlemen, just getting into the 1903..Got a 1903 with the markings : US SPRINGFIELD ARMORY MODEL 1903 MARK I seriel# 10547xx. When was this made? It only has 10% finish and I want to have it reblued. Im confused because my bolt is parked. What was the original finish? TIA!! :help:

Your rifle was serialized, either at the very end of 1918 or the very beginning of 1919. At that time, I believe Springfield had started using a black Parkerizing treatment and had ended bluing rifles.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rick the Librarian

Your rifle was serialized, either at the very end of 1918 or the very beginning of 1919. At that time, I believe Springfield had started using a black Parkerizing treatment and had ended bluing rifles.

---

So if the original finish was Parkerizing, would this be zinc, manganese or iron phosphating?

I'll let others mopre knowledgeable than I answer, although I'm virtually positive it was not the first two.

One thing to keep in mind is that if your rifle is a mixmaster, with several WWII replacement parts, I wouldn't be in too much of a hurry to refinish to post-WWI standards. If it is totally correct (with Mark I parts) I would also not want to refinish, as you will lower the value significently IMHO.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sgt. Saunders

So if the original finish was Parkerizing, would this be zinc, manganese or iron phosphating?

---

The original finish on your Mark I rifle was olive-grey parkerizing covered on all exposed surfaces with black paint. The receiver was finished with a different substance of unknown chemical composition that is best replicated with glossy black enamel.

Hope this helps.

J.B.

manganese phosphate would be the closest choice available today. Iron Phosphate is not intended to be used on firearms.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sgt. Saunders

So if the original finish was Parkerizing, would this be zinc, manganese or iron phosphating?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by chuckindenver

Iron Phosphate is not intended to be used on firearms.

---

I would think that any sort of finish involving iron would be susceptible to it's own rust issues. Is that it?

FWIW; AFAIK; IMHO; YMMV; yadda, yadda, yadda.

Regards, Ed Mann

Bobby Bowden is doing a fine job - just leave him alone.

Albert says, "Click here for free Gator wallpaper."

https://www.milsurps.com/images/impo...aGators2-1.png

Thanks Gentlemen!!!!!!! :thup:

not sure, im only going by what my suppier states, i dont use one of the Brownells, or other solutions, i get mine from the same company the US military used.
it may be too harsh, or too thick.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by John Beard

The original finish on your Mark I rifle was olive-grey parkerizing covered on all exposed surfaces with black paint. The receiver was finished with a different substance of unknown chemical composition that is best replicated with glossy black enamel.

Hope this helps.

J.B.

---

John;

You are the second knowledgeable collector I have heard this from. What is the source of the information and how come we don't routinely see at least some Mk1s in this original trim? Do you have any photos?