+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: What's the earliest LB No.4 Mk1* you've seen?

Click here to increase the font size Click here to reduce the font size
  1. #1
    Legacy Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Hampshire
    Posts
    561

    What's the earliest LB No.4 Mk1* you've seen?

    I have just reserved LB Mk1* serial number 1L5110, which I figure must be quite a low number for the Mk1*.

    What's the lowest number anyone has or has seen?

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Roy W View Post
    I have just reserved LB Mk1* serial number 1L5110, which I figure must be quite a low number for the Mk1*.

    What's the lowest number anyone has or has seen?
    Your rifle is serial number 15,110.

    I believe 0L5 (serial no. 5) sold recently at auction
    Last edited by Lee Enfield; 04-28-2021 at 10:28 AM. Reason: correction

  3. #3
    Legacy Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Hampshire
    Posts
    561
    Thanks. I was aware of what number mine is, I was specifically asking about the earliest Mk1* not the Mk1's.

    Cheers

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Roy W View Post
    Thanks. I was aware of what number mine is, I was specifically asking about the earliest Mk1* not the Mk1's.

    Cheers
    You've got to be near the cross over - is the receiver date 1941 or 1942?

  5. #5
    Legacy Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Hampshire
    Posts
    561
    It's 1942 marked receiver, mk 2 rear sight, square cocking piece.

    It's all parkerised, so suggesting a refurb

    I realise it is near the changeover, I was just wondering what the lowest number Mk1* was that anyone has or has seen.

    Thanks

  6. #6
    Legacy Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    New Mexico
    Posts
    155
    I have 1L2158. 1941. All correct and matching with South African property marks.

  7. #7
    Legacy Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Hampshire
    Posts
    561
    Quote Originally Posted by Charlie View Post
    I have 1L2158. 1941. All correct and matching with South African property marks.
    Is that a Mk1*?

    If not, it isn't what I am asking
    Roy

    ---------- Post added at 09:28 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:27 AM ----------

    Maybe I worded this wrong, but I am asking about Mk1* rifles not Mk1's

    thanks

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Roy W View Post
    Is that a Mk1*?

    If not, it isn't what I am asking
    Roy

    ---------- Post added at 09:28 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:27 AM ----------

    Maybe I worded this wrong, but I am asking about Mk1* rifles not Mk1's

    thanks
    I trolled thru the stickied LB serial number thread:
    highest 1941 MkI:
    1L3851
    1L4798
    1L6926

    Lowest 1942 MkI*:
    1L4072
    1L5979
    1L6797

    so there seems to have been a bit of overlap.
    My understanding is that the serial number was one of the last operations (probably after fitting the bolt).

    BreakeyP posted a LB with both MkI and MkI* bolt releases here a few years ago. As I recall the serial number was mid to late 1942 production.
    Last edited by Lee Enfield; 04-29-2021 at 03:13 PM. Reason: https://www.milsurps.com/showthread.php?t=15681
    BSN from the Republic of Alberta

    http://www.cartridgecollectors.org/

  9. #9
    Legacy Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Last On
    @
    Location
    Hampshire
    Posts
    561
    Quote Originally Posted by Lee Enfield View Post
    I trolled thru the stickied LB serial number thread:
    highest 1941 MkI:
    1L3851
    1L4798
    1L6926

    Lowest 1942 MkI*:
    1L4072
    1L5979
    1L6797

    so there seems to have been a bit of overlap.
    My understanding is that the serial number was one of the last operations (probably after fitting the bolt).

    Paul Breakey posted a LB with both MkI and MkI* bolt releases here a few years ago. As I recall the serial number was mid to late 1942 production.
    Thanks for that, I wonder if those numbers are correct, or people have made the same errors as they did on this thread and referred to 1's as 1*'s and vice versa?

    The 1L6926 does seem very late for a Mk1.

    Likewise the 1L4072 seems low for a 1*

    The search continues, as they say

    cheers

  10. #10
    Legacy Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Last On
    @
    Location
    US of A
    Posts
    979
    This is the information that I have so far.....

    1941 1L3851 1
    1941 1L4131 1
    1941 1L4588 1
    1941 1L4798 1
    1941 1L6926 1

    1942 1L5979 1*
    1942 1L6797 1*
    1942 1L9659
    1942 2L1037 1*
    1942 2L1378 1*

    So 1L5110 as a Mark 1* is low. What year is it, 41 or 42? As you can see there is crossed up dates, due to production methods used.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Earliest date for Ishapore 2A/2A1?
    By BurtonP in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 04-01-2020, 08:49 PM
  2. Earliest Lithgow Rifles
    By muffett.2008 in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 11-22-2017, 07:56 AM
  3. Care To Share Your Earliest Mk. 1/2 or 1/3 ?
    By SpikeDD in forum The Lee Enfield Knowledge Library Collectors Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 12-31-2015, 07:21 PM
  4. Earliest C1 bayonets?
    By Lee Enfield in forum Edged Weapons Forum
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 12-15-2013, 12:11 PM
  5. Earliest Date On An Hra Barrel
    By jjones in forum M1 Garand/M14/M1A Rifles
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-20-2009, 01:13 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts